Occupation of the American Mind by Israel

[Roudy]

Maybe, Tinmore, some day you will get an E-mail along with another one of the videos you receive asking you if you want a job in the studio churning out these videos should you ever decide to return to the area of your roots.

You are proving his point that he earlier made. Boy, it cannot get any more poetic than this

He is proving just what he is with his constant flow of videos taken over there. He, like you, isn't fooling anyone.

Now, you are threatening me too You are a sick lady.

I am threatening you??? I have a great idea. Why not make copies of all your posts, and show them to your co-workers at lunch tomorrow. See what they say about them.

Now, you want to threaten my co-workers. You seem to be inspired by Hitler.

"threaten coworkers"?

 

[Bleipriester]

This one is a pretty interesting article.

---

The Occupation of the American Mind poses the question: why are mainstream US media such a reliable conduit for Israeli propaganda compared to other countries?

In attempting to answer this question, the film, narrated by Roger Waters, illuminates not just the inner workings of Israeli hasbara (propaganda) but also the root causes of the occupation itself by depicting the systematic denial of Palestinians’ human and national rights.

This film could not possibly arrive at a better time, given the extent to which Israeli hasbara will be promoted during the US presidential election campaign.

It explores a relatively unexamined aspect of the US-Israel “special relationship” and helps explain why a majority of Americans influenced by media bias support and identify with the Israeli narrative.

The revelations made in the documentary will engage both those unfamiliar with the Palestinian narrative along with veteran solidarity activists who may think they’ve seen it all.

...

What's behind the US media's special relationship with Israel?

Ah, the old antisemtic canard about Jews controlling the media and the banks. How refreshing.

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

 

[Roudy]

This one is a pretty interesting article.

---

The Occupation of the American Mind poses the question: why are mainstream US media such a reliable conduit for Israeli propaganda compared to other countries?

In attempting to answer this question, the film, narrated by Roger Waters, illuminates not just the inner workings of Israeli hasbara (propaganda) but also the root causes of the occupation itself by depicting the systematic denial of Palestinians’ human and national rights.

This film could not possibly arrive at a better time, given the extent to which Israeli hasbara will be promoted during the US presidential election campaign.

It explores a relatively unexamined aspect of the US-Israel “special relationship” and helps explain why a majority of Americans influenced by media bias support and identify with the Israeli narrative.

The revelations made in the documentary will engage both those unfamiliar with the Palestinian narrative along with veteran solidarity activists who may think they’ve seen it all.

...

What's behind the US media's special relationship with Israel?

Ah, the old antisemtic canard about Jews controlling the media and the banks. How refreshing.

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

As it has been with the American public in general and the US govt. and all US presidents, since the reestablishment of the state of Israel. But what does that have to do with the topic?

Antisemetic Canard

An antisemitic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting antisemitism. Despite being false by definition, antisemitic canards often form part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies

Accusations of controlling the media
One well-known antisemitic cliché is that "the Jews control the media". Historically, it has been traced to discredited early 20th-century publications such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1903) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent.

J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, in 1997 published a study of this myth regarding the United States, concluding that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel. Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press, and the music industry.

 

[Bleipriester]

This one is a pretty interesting article.

---

The Occupation of the American Mind poses the question: why are mainstream US media such a reliable conduit for Israeli propaganda compared to other countries?

In attempting to answer this question, the film, narrated by Roger Waters, illuminates not just the inner workings of Israeli hasbara (propaganda) but also the root causes of the occupation itself by depicting the systematic denial of Palestinians’ human and national rights.

This film could not possibly arrive at a better time, given the extent to which Israeli hasbara will be promoted during the US presidential election campaign.

It explores a relatively unexamined aspect of the US-Israel “special relationship” and helps explain why a majority of Americans influenced by media bias support and identify with the Israeli narrative.

The revelations made in the documentary will engage both those unfamiliar with the Palestinian narrative along with veteran solidarity activists who may think they’ve seen it all.

...

What's behind the US media's special relationship with Israel?

Ah, the old antisemtic canard about Jews controlling the media and the banks. How refreshing.

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

As it has been with the American public in general and the US govt. and all US presidents, since the reestablishment of the state of Israel. But what does that have to do with the topic?

Antisemetic Canard

An antisemitic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting antisemitism. Despite being false by definition, antisemitic canards often form part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies

Accusations of controlling the media
One well-known antisemitic cliché is that "the Jews control the media". Historically, it has been traced to discredited early 20th-century publications such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1903) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent.

J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, in 1997 published a study of this myth regarding the United States, concluding that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel. Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press, and the music industry.

Maybe they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns". After all, the customers focus on their own country, of course. But in the end, where criticism should be in - objective - articles, there are only poor explanations or there is nothing at all. You know, the US has sanctioned and invaded countries for far less than what Israel does in Gaza or even for nothing. Iraq has been invaded in 2003 following two UN resolutions.

 

[numan]

'
The premise of this thread is quite false.

It presupposes that brainwashed Americans have minds.
.

 

[Roudy]

This one is a pretty interesting article.

---

The Occupation of the American Mind poses the question: why are mainstream US media such a reliable conduit for Israeli propaganda compared to other countries?

In attempting to answer this question, the film, narrated by Roger Waters, illuminates not just the inner workings of Israeli hasbara (propaganda) but also the root causes of the occupation itself by depicting the systematic denial of Palestinians’ human and national rights.

This film could not possibly arrive at a better time, given the extent to which Israeli hasbara will be promoted during the US presidential election campaign.

It explores a relatively unexamined aspect of the US-Israel “special relationship” and helps explain why a majority of Americans influenced by media bias support and identify with the Israeli narrative.

The revelations made in the documentary will engage both those unfamiliar with the Palestinian narrative along with veteran solidarity activists who may think they’ve seen it all.

...

What's behind the US media's special relationship with Israel?

Ah, the old antisemtic canard about Jews controlling the media and the banks. How refreshing.

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

As it has been with the American public in general and the US govt. and all US presidents, since the reestablishment of the state of Israel. But what does that have to do with the topic?

Antisemetic Canard

An antisemitic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting antisemitism. Despite being false by definition, antisemitic canards often form part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies

Accusations of controlling the media
One well-known antisemitic cliché is that "the Jews control the media". Historically, it has been traced to discredited early 20th-century publications such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1903) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent.

J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, in 1997 published a study of this myth regarding the United States, concluding that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel. Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press, and the music industry.

Maybe they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns". After all, the customers focus on their own country, of course. But in the end, where criticism should be in - objective - articles, there are only poor explanations or there is nothing at all. You know, the US has sanctioned and invaded countries for far less than what Israel does in Gaza or even for nothing. Iraq has been invaded in 2003 following two UN resolutions.

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

 

[Sally]

You are proving his point that he earlier made. Boy, it cannot get any more poetic than this

He is proving just what he is with his constant flow of videos taken over there. He, like you, isn't fooling anyone.

Now, you are threatening me too You are a sick lady.

I am threatening you??? I have a great idea. Why not make copies of all your posts, and show them to your co-workers at lunch tomorrow. See what they say about them.

Now, you want to threaten my co-workers. You seem to be inspired by Hitler.

"threaten coworkers"?

That statement about me threatening his co-workers shows how mentally ill he is. He should get some help for his problems. If his co-workers saw his posts, they would suggest the same. No doubt his medical insurance covers visits to a psychiatrist.

 

[Vikrant]

This one is a pretty interesting article.

---

The Occupation of the American Mind poses the question: why are mainstream US media such a reliable conduit for Israeli propaganda compared to other countries?

In attempting to answer this question, the film, narrated by Roger Waters, illuminates not just the inner workings of Israeli hasbara (propaganda) but also the root causes of the occupation itself by depicting the systematic denial of Palestinians’ human and national rights.

This film could not possibly arrive at a better time, given the extent to which Israeli hasbara will be promoted during the US presidential election campaign.

It explores a relatively unexamined aspect of the US-Israel “special relationship” and helps explain why a majority of Americans influenced by media bias support and identify with the Israeli narrative.

The revelations made in the documentary will engage both those unfamiliar with the Palestinian narrative along with veteran solidarity activists who may think they’ve seen it all.

...

What's behind the US media's special relationship with Israel?

Ah, the old antisemtic canard about Jews controlling the media and the banks. How refreshing.

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

There are two categories of Israel supporters on this forum:

a. Jewish diaspora which sympathizes with Israeli cause plus Hasbara bots
b. People who can be easily duped by propaganda propagated by media outlets that serve as Israel's mouthpiece

 

[Roudy]

This one is a pretty interesting article.

---

The Occupation of the American Mind poses the question: why are mainstream US media such a reliable conduit for Israeli propaganda compared to other countries?

In attempting to answer this question, the film, narrated by Roger Waters, illuminates not just the inner workings of Israeli hasbara (propaganda) but also the root causes of the occupation itself by depicting the systematic denial of Palestinians’ human and national rights.

This film could not possibly arrive at a better time, given the extent to which Israeli hasbara will be promoted during the US presidential election campaign.

It explores a relatively unexamined aspect of the US-Israel “special relationship” and helps explain why a majority of Americans influenced by media bias support and identify with the Israeli narrative.

The revelations made in the documentary will engage both those unfamiliar with the Palestinian narrative along with veteran solidarity activists who may think they’ve seen it all.

...

What's behind the US media's special relationship with Israel?

Ah, the old antisemtic canard about Jews controlling the media and the banks. How refreshing.

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

There are two categories of Israel supporters on this forum:

a. Jewish diaspora which sympathizes with Israeli cause plus Hasbara bots
b. People who can be easily duped by propaganda propagated by media outlets that serve as Israel's mouthpiece

Which category of antisemtic terrorist supporter are you? The one that served time in prison and converted to Islam?

 

[Bleipriester]

This one is a pretty interesting article.

---

The Occupation of the American Mind poses the question: why are mainstream US media such a reliable conduit for Israeli propaganda compared to other countries?

In attempting to answer this question, the film, narrated by Roger Waters, illuminates not just the inner workings of Israeli hasbara (propaganda) but also the root causes of the occupation itself by depicting the systematic denial of Palestinians’ human and national rights.

This film could not possibly arrive at a better time, given the extent to which Israeli hasbara will be promoted during the US presidential election campaign.

It explores a relatively unexamined aspect of the US-Israel “special relationship” and helps explain why a majority of Americans influenced by media bias support and identify with the Israeli narrative.

The revelations made in the documentary will engage both those unfamiliar with the Palestinian narrative along with veteran solidarity activists who may think they’ve seen it all.

...

What's behind the US media's special relationship with Israel?

Ah, the old antisemtic canard about Jews controlling the media and the banks. How refreshing.

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

As it has been with the American public in general and the US govt. and all US presidents, since the reestablishment of the state of Israel. But what does that have to do with the topic?

Antisemetic Canard

An antisemitic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting antisemitism. Despite being false by definition, antisemitic canards often form part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies

Accusations of controlling the media
One well-known antisemitic cliché is that "the Jews control the media". Historically, it has been traced to discredited early 20th-century publications such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1903) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent.

J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, in 1997 published a study of this myth regarding the United States, concluding that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel. Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press, and the music industry.

Maybe they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns". After all, the customers focus on their own country, of course. But in the end, where criticism should be in - objective - articles, there are only poor explanations or there is nothing at all. You know, the US has sanctioned and invaded countries for far less than what Israel does in Gaza or even for nothing. Iraq has been invaded in 2003 following two UN resolutions.

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

 

[Roudy]

Ah, the old antisemtic canard about Jews controlling the media and the banks. How refreshing.

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

As it has been with the American public in general and the US govt. and all US presidents, since the reestablishment of the state of Israel. But what does that have to do with the topic?

Antisemetic Canard

An antisemitic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting antisemitism. Despite being false by definition, antisemitic canards often form part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies

Accusations of controlling the media
One well-known antisemitic cliché is that "the Jews control the media". Historically, it has been traced to discredited early 20th-century publications such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1903) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent.

J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, in 1997 published a study of this myth regarding the United States, concluding that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel. Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press, and the music industry.

Maybe they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns". After all, the customers focus on their own country, of course. But in the end, where criticism should be in - objective - articles, there are only poor explanations or there is nothing at all. You know, the US has sanctioned and invaded countries for far less than what Israel does in Gaza or even for nothing. Iraq has been invaded in 2003 following two UN resolutions.

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

You must also have ADD. YOU claimed that US has invaded countries for far less, which is a statement only an ignorant moron would make. Actually the US should now be bombing Assad and his military to ashes for committing genocide on his own people. But they don't, because of what might come next.

 

[Bleipriester]

Well, support for Israel is pretty strong here on USMB...

As it has been with the American public in general and the US govt. and all US presidents, since the reestablishment of the state of Israel. But what does that have to do with the topic?

Antisemetic Canard

An antisemitic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting antisemitism. Despite being false by definition, antisemitic canards often form part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies

Accusations of controlling the media
One well-known antisemitic cliché is that "the Jews control the media". Historically, it has been traced to discredited early 20th-century publications such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1903) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent.

J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, in 1997 published a study of this myth regarding the United States, concluding that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel. Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press, and the music industry.

Maybe they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns". After all, the customers focus on their own country, of course. But in the end, where criticism should be in - objective - articles, there are only poor explanations or there is nothing at all. You know, the US has sanctioned and invaded countries for far less than what Israel does in Gaza or even for nothing. Iraq has been invaded in 2003 following two UN resolutions.

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

You must also have ADD. YOU claimed that US has invaded countries for far less, which is a statement only an ignorant moron would make. Actually the US should now be bombing Assad and his military to ashes for committing genocide on his own people. But they don't, because of what might come next.

You would like the opponents of Al-Qaeda and ISIS to be bombed, you bloodthirsty asshole, right? You also like to make Al-Qaeda propaganda, right? Luckily, you are just a minor issue spreading lies on a message board.

 

[Roudy]

As it has been with the American public in general and the US govt. and all US presidents, since the reestablishment of the state of Israel. But what does that have to do with the topic?

Antisemetic Canard

An antisemitic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting antisemitism. Despite being false by definition, antisemitic canards often form part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies

Accusations of controlling the media
One well-known antisemitic cliché is that "the Jews control the media". Historically, it has been traced to discredited early 20th-century publications such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (1903) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent.

J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, in 1997 published a study of this myth regarding the United States, concluding that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel. Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press, and the music industry.

Maybe they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns". After all, the customers focus on their own country, of course. But in the end, where criticism should be in - objective - articles, there are only poor explanations or there is nothing at all. You know, the US has sanctioned and invaded countries for far less than what Israel does in Gaza or even for nothing. Iraq has been invaded in 2003 following two UN resolutions.

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

You must also have ADD. YOU claimed that US has invaded countries for far less, which is a statement only an ignorant moron would make. Actually the US should now be bombing Assad and his military to ashes for committing genocide on his own people. But they don't, because of what might come next.

You would like the opponents of Al-Qaeda and ISIS to be bombed, you bloodthirsty asshole, right? You also like to make Al-Qaeda propaganda, right? Luckily, you are just a minor issue spreading lies on a message board.

Wow, say something bad about Assad and the guy totally flips out, and starts rambling totally incomprehensible bullshit. It's almost like you insulted a relative or something. Are you translating from Arabic to English? That never comes out right and you come out sounding like an angry donkey.

 

[Bleipriester]

Maybe they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns". After all, the customers focus on their own country, of course. But in the end, where criticism should be in - objective - articles, there are only poor explanations or there is nothing at all. You know, the US has sanctioned and invaded countries for far less than what Israel does in Gaza or even for nothing. Iraq has been invaded in 2003 following two UN resolutions.

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

You must also have ADD. YOU claimed that US has invaded countries for far less, which is a statement only an ignorant moron would make. Actually the US should now be bombing Assad and his military to ashes for committing genocide on his own people. But they don't, because of what might come next.

You would like the opponents of Al-Qaeda and ISIS to be bombed, you bloodthirsty asshole, right? You also like to make Al-Qaeda propaganda, right? Luckily, you are just a minor issue spreading lies on a message board.

Wow, say something bad about Assad and the guy totally flips out, and starts rambling totally incomprehensible bullshit. It's almost like you insulted a relative or something. Are you translating from Arabic to English? That never comes out right and you come out sounding like an angry donkey.

I think you would just cut quite a genocidal dictator.

 

[irosie91]

Another thing I find curious about Israeli influenced media in this country is that they co-ordinate with each other in spreading propaganda against countries that do not toe Israel's line. I am not even talking about countries like Iran that have direct contention with Israel.

Did you ever notice that in any of the MSM, in the rare occasion that they have a Palestinian spokesperson, the first thing out of the host's mouth is an Israeli talking point?

How do all of these people in different outlets get the same script?

MR tin DID IT AGAIN that old time religion about which I learned WAY BACK
in the 1950s as a child---standard islamo-nazism ------reading old pamphlets written
long before there was a country called ISRAEL. to simplify the islamo Nazi
creed----"THE JEWS ARE ALL ENGAGED
IN A COLLECTIVE CONSPIRACY AGAINST
US-----AND THEY WANT OUR ***MONEY***
(???) and they want to DESTROY OUR RELGION and they want to CONTROL THE WORLD. As a child I thought the writings were a joke-----like MAD MAGAZINE (which came out about 1960) But then I came into
contact with your (and educated, no less) persons from south east asia ----who PARROTED the crap chapter and verse.
I came to understand thru so much exposure to the creed---that Nazi war criminals wrote
the curriculum for muslim school childen in both Pakistan and India-----at that time --not so much Iran------but later on IRAN joined with
enthusiasm. At that time---not so much hindus----but now some hindus have jumped
on the bandwagon now that that bandwagon looks SO STRONG to them-----

 

[Sally]

Maybe they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns". After all, the customers focus on their own country, of course. But in the end, where criticism should be in - objective - articles, there are only poor explanations or there is nothing at all. You know, the US has sanctioned and invaded countries for far less than what Israel does in Gaza or even for nothing. Iraq has been invaded in 2003 following two UN resolutions.

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

You must also have ADD. YOU claimed that US has invaded countries for far less, which is a statement only an ignorant moron would make. Actually the US should now be bombing Assad and his military to ashes for committing genocide on his own people. But they don't, because of what might come next.

You would like the opponents of Al-Qaeda and ISIS to be bombed, you bloodthirsty asshole, right? You also like to make Al-Qaeda propaganda, right? Luckily, you are just a minor issue spreading lies on a message board.

Wow, say something bad about Assad and the guy totally flips out, and starts rambling totally incomprehensible bullshit. It's almost like you insulted a relative or something. Are you translating from Arabic to English? That never comes out right and you come out sounding like an angry donkey.

It is funny, isn't it, the way he carried on about his boyfriend? One would think that the boyfriend wears a halo instead of having a lot of blood on his hands. Additionally, if we don't fall at the feet of his boyfriend and worship him as he does, then, this crackpot thinks we are all terrorist supporters. It would never enter the crackpot;s mind that we think all the groups involved in the Syrian conflict, including his beloved's regime, are all barbaric savages. Perhaps he could find some Syrian refugees in his own area who can give him the scoop on Assad.

By the way. Roudy, every time he uses some avatar with a weapon, I think of a little boy playing with his cap pistol.

 

[Roudy]

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

You must also have ADD. YOU claimed that US has invaded countries for far less, which is a statement only an ignorant moron would make. Actually the US should now be bombing Assad and his military to ashes for committing genocide on his own people. But they don't, because of what might come next.

You would like the opponents of Al-Qaeda and ISIS to be bombed, you bloodthirsty asshole, right? You also like to make Al-Qaeda propaganda, right? Luckily, you are just a minor issue spreading lies on a message board.

Wow, say something bad about Assad and the guy totally flips out, and starts rambling totally incomprehensible bullshit. It's almost like you insulted a relative or something. Are you translating from Arabic to English? That never comes out right and you come out sounding like an angry donkey.

It is funny, isn't it, the way he carried on about his boyfriend? One would think that the boyfriend wears a halo instead of having a lot of blood on his hands. Additionally, if we don't fall at the feet of his boyfriend and worship him as he does, then, this crackpot thinks we are all terrorist supporters. It would never enter the crackpot;s mind that we think all the groups involved in the Syrian conflict, including his beloved's regime, are all barbaric savages. Perhaps he could find some Syrian refugees in his own area who can give him the scoop on Assad.

By the way. Roudy, every time he uses some avatar with a weapon, I think of a little boy playing with his cap pistol.

Funny but true. Truth is you'll find a lot of morons with the same mentality as Bluefister in the Middle East. They get infatuated with a leader or ruler and are even ready to give their lives for them. Many of them have relatives or are connected in some way or another to whatever barbaric Muslim regime they're infatuated with.

 

[Bleipriester]

Really? The US has invaded other countries because they defended themselves by taking decisive actions against Islamist terrorists that were shooting over 5000 rockets into their cities?

Just one more indication of how stupid you are.

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

You must also have ADD. YOU claimed that US has invaded countries for far less, which is a statement only an ignorant moron would make. Actually the US should now be bombing Assad and his military to ashes for committing genocide on his own people. But they don't, because of what might come next.

You would like the opponents of Al-Qaeda and ISIS to be bombed, you bloodthirsty asshole, right? You also like to make Al-Qaeda propaganda, right? Luckily, you are just a minor issue spreading lies on a message board.

Wow, say something bad about Assad and the guy totally flips out, and starts rambling totally incomprehensible bullshit. It's almost like you insulted a relative or something. Are you translating from Arabic to English? That never comes out right and you come out sounding like an angry donkey.

It is funny, isn't it, the way he carried on about his boyfriend? One would think that the boyfriend wears a halo instead of having a lot of blood on his hands. Additionally, if we don't fall at the feet of his boyfriend and worship him as he does, then, this crackpot thinks we are all terrorist supporters. It would never enter the crackpot;s mind that we think all the groups involved in the Syrian conflict, including his beloved's regime, are all barbaric savages. Perhaps he could find some Syrian refugees in his own area who can give him the scoop on Assad.

By the way. Roudy, every time he uses some avatar with a weapon, I think of a little boy playing with his cap pistol.

You spread terrorist propaganda, so you support terrorists.

 

[Roudy]

How did the US defend itself in Iraq?

You must also have ADD. YOU claimed that US has invaded countries for far less, which is a statement only an ignorant moron would make. Actually the US should now be bombing Assad and his military to ashes for committing genocide on his own people. But they don't, because of what might come next.

You would like the opponents of Al-Qaeda and ISIS to be bombed, you bloodthirsty asshole, right? You also like to make Al-Qaeda propaganda, right? Luckily, you are just a minor issue spreading lies on a message board.

Wow, say something bad about Assad and the guy totally flips out, and starts rambling totally incomprehensible bullshit. It's almost like you insulted a relative or something. Are you translating from Arabic to English? That never comes out right and you come out sounding like an angry donkey.

It is funny, isn't it, the way he carried on about his boyfriend? One would think that the boyfriend wears a halo instead of having a lot of blood on his hands. Additionally, if we don't fall at the feet of his boyfriend and worship him as he does, then, this crackpot thinks we are all terrorist supporters. It would never enter the crackpot;s mind that we think all the groups involved in the Syrian conflict, including his beloved's regime, are all barbaric savages. Perhaps he could find some Syrian refugees in his own area who can give him the scoop on Assad.

By the way. Roudy, every time he uses some avatar with a weapon, I think of a little boy playing with his cap pistol.

You spread terrorist propaganda, so you support terrorists.

How ironic your statement is, considering Assad supports Hezbollah and other Islamic terrorist organizations, and he himself is a terrorist.

 

[Bleipriester]

Hezbollah isn´t terrorist.