look dude - she diverts a million dollars to her boyfriends account and you're ok with this?
No,. she didn't. A propaganda website made that up, and you fell for it.
That's the lesson here. You Trumpflakes fall for anything, because you're not very bright, and because you love being lied to. That's why you're Trumpflakes.
"No,. she didn't. A propaganda website made that up, and you fell for it."
"SNOPES GETS THE FACTS WRONG ON OCASIO-CORTEZ CAMPAIGN FINANCE SCANDALS
Ocasio-Cortez and Saikat Chakrabarti, her former campaign chair and current chief of staff, obtained majority control of Justice Democrats in December 2017. The PAC, which had raised more than $1.8 million before her June 2018 primary, has been widely credited with
manufacturing her upset victory over incumbent Democrat Joe Crowley.
Snopes writer Dan MacGuill falsely claimed in his
story that Chakrabarti, who served as
executive director of Justice Democrats, āwas not an official agent or officerā of the PAC. He also failed to acknowledge the fact that Chakrabarti and Ocasio-Cortez are members of the PACās three-member board of directors, according to archived versions of the Justice Democrats website and
corporate filings obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Chakrabarti began serving as Executive Director of Justice Democrats in January 2017, according to his
LinkedIn.
...Ocasio-Cortez and her top aide ācould be facing jail timeā ...."
Snopes Gets The Facts Wrong On Ocasio-Cortez Campaign Finance Scandals
Bet you really hate it when your post becomes a boomerang, huh?
Sooo.....when will you be changing your name to HumanPunchingBag?????
i've tried to defend snopes in the past but they sure do make it hard.
No results for:
(Cortez campaign scandal)
Your search did not yield any results. Your search terms may need to be revised, or we have not written an article on that topic.
One of the best tips for locating articles on our site is to avoid the use of searches that are too lengthy or specific. Therefore, the optimal search strategy is to avoid pasting specific phrases from items (such as subject lines and opening sentences) into our search engine and instead focus on selecting a few distinctive words or names to use as search terms.
If you still don't find the item you're looking for, please use our
Submission Form to send it to us. We can't write about it if we don't know about it!
take out "scandal" and suddenly...you get 2 pages of info.
put on "finance" and you get 2 articles, neither of which have a thing to do with her laundering money.
btw - "cortez laundering money" comes up with nothing also.
fuck snopes.
Certainly a thankless job, defending Snopes....or any of the other 'fact checkers.'
They are all Leftist liars and apologists.
EXCLUSIVE: Facebook 'fact checker' who will arbitrate on 'fake news' is accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes - and its staff includes an escort-porn star and 'Vice Vixen domme'
Ā·
Facebook has announced plans to check for 'fake news' using a series of organizations to assess whether stories are true
Ā·
One of them is a website called Snopes.com which claims to be one of the web's 'essential resources' and 'painstaking, scholarly and reliable'
Ā·
It was founded by husband-and-wife Barbara and David Mikkelson, who used a letterhead claiming they were a non-existent society to start their research
Ā·
Now they are divorced - with Barbara claiming in legal documents he embezzled $98,000 of company money and spent it on 'himself and prostitutes'
Ā·
In a lengthy and bitter legal dispute he is claiming to be underpaid and demanding 'industry standard' or at least $360,000 a year
Ā·
The two also dispute what are basic facts of their case - despite Snopes.com saying its 'ownership' is committed to 'accuracy and impartiality'
Ā·
Snopes.com founder David Mikkelson's new wife Elyssa Young is employed by the website as an administrator
Ā·
She has worked as an escort and porn actress and despite claims website is non-political ran as a Libertarian for Congress on a 'Dump Bush' platform
Ā·
Its main 'fact checker' is Kimberly LaCapria, whose blog 'ViceVixen' says she is in touch with her 'domme side' and has posted on Snopes.com while smoking pot
Read more:
Facebook 'fact checker' Snopes.com accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes | Daily Mail Online
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter |
DailyMail on Facebook
āā¦a fact checking organization that prides itself on its claimed neutrality. Think about it this way ā what if there was a fact checking organization whose fact checkers were all drawn from the ranks of Breitbart and Infowars? Most liberals would likely dismiss such an organization as partisan and biased. Similarly, an organization whose fact checkers were all drawn from Occupy Democrats and Huffington Post might be dismissed by conservatives as partisan and biased.ā
The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact Checkers
Is Snopes biased? Why do some people believe Snopes is biased?
13 Answers
Michael KryÅski, Entrepreneur. 10+ Years Software Development. Master's in Computer Science.
Updated Nov 18 2016
Yes, Snopes has become incredibly biased as of 2016. It wasn't always the case, it always leaned a bit to the left, just because it's on the internet, but it was never overt. I used to frequent both Snopes (for non political stories), Politifact and
FactCheck.org (for political stories) daily up until around 2015. It's quite sad what had happened to these once highly-trusted publications.
A lot has changed in the past year. Snopes, Politifact and FactCheck are all currently aggressively pushing narratives. I wouldn't say itās promoting left leaning narratives either. These sites regularly misconstrued facts during Bernie Sanderās campaign. This
article really stood out to me from May of 2016. It says that a viral image does not show a recent Bernie rally. However, video from the event
[1] shows that it was, in fact, taken from the same event. Snopes never explained why they thought it was taken from a previous rally. They just insisted it did.
This happened dozens of times during Bernieās campaign.
However, more recently they have been aggressively pushing a pro-Clinton (and anti-Trump) narrative almost daily.
https://www.quora.com/Is-Snopes-biased-Why-do-some-people-believe-Snopes-is-biased
Fact-Checking Snopes: Websiteās Political āFact-Checkerā Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger
ā¦the site has tried to
pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopesā āfact-checkingā looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and itās political āfact-checkerā describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans āregressiveā and afraid of āfemale agency.ā
Snopesā main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that ā oddly enough ā is known for publishing
fake quotes and even
downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
While at Inquisitr, the future āfact-checkerā consistently displayed clear partisanship
(RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)
She described herself as ā
openly left-leaningā and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as ā
teahadists.ā She called Bill Clinton ā
one of our greatestā presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunhamās comparison of voting to sex because they ā
fear female agency.ā
After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays defense for her fellow liberals. ā
Fact-Checking Snopes: Websiteās Political āFact-Checkerā Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger