Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I just want to repeat this claim:10. One more reminder: no one provide proof that Hussein Obama knows anything about the law.
Did he learn about law in college????
For starters, Obama did not do nearly well enough at his previous stop, Columbia University, to justify admission to Harvard Law. According to the New York Sun, university spokesman Brian Connolly confirmed that Obama graduated in 1983 with a major in political science but without honors. In the age of affirmative action and grade inflation, a minority in a relatively easy major like political science had to under-perform dramatically to avoid minimal honors. Obama apparently did just that.
Harvard Law School is notoriously difficult to get into. Annually, some 7,000 applications apply for some 500 seats. Applicant LSAT scores generally chart in the 98 to 99 percentile range, and GPAs average between 3.80 and 3.95.If Obama's LSAT scores merited admission, we would know about them. We don't. The Obama camp guards those scores, like his SAT scores, more tightly that Iran does its nuclear secrets.
Obama did not make the Harvard Law Review (HLR) the old-fashioned way, the way HLR's first black editor, Charles Houston, did 70 years prior.To Obama's good fortune, the HLR had replaced a meritocracy in which editors were elected based on grades – the president being the student with the highest academic rank – with one in which half the editors were chosen through a writing competition.This competition, the New York Times reported in 1990, was "meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review."
Unlike most editors, and likely all its presidents, Obama was not a writer. During his tenure at Harvard, he wrote only one heavily edited, unsigned note. …once elected, Obama contributed not one signed word to the HLR or any other law journal. As Matthew Franck has pointed out in National Review Online, "A search of the HeinOnline database of law journals turns up exactly nothing credited to Obama in any law review anywhere at any time." Jack Cashill - National Articles:
In short, Obama knows less than nothing about either the law, or about honesty.
Obama may be a dunce….but not nearly as much as dunce as those who voted for and still support him.
So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.
Before attacking the judge in Michael Flynn's case, Sean Hannity used to praise his integrity
Hannity and other Fox personalities loved Judge Emmet Sullivan -- before they turned on him
The right-wing media machine is particularly upset that Sullivan ordered a hearing to resolve issues that arose as a result of the Trump Justice Department moving suddenly to drop the case, even though Flynn had twice attested to his guilt in open court. Further, reports indicate that key context was left out of the DOJ’s filing.
Put another way: It’s not Sullivan’s conclusions that are making right-wing media rage -- because he hasn’t made any. It is his decision that the resolution of the case be decided in a fair, open hearing -- and not through the corruption of Attorney General Bill Barr's DOJ.
So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.
Die he lie about Flynn too?
How DARE anyone ask why Flynn would be talking to Kisliak?
So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.
Die he lie about Flynn too?
I am curious why you lunatics keep posting this -
At the time, this was supposedly true -
Then we found out that it wasn't
Except there was.As more and more classified testimony is revealed, we learn that not only was there no collusion with Russia by the Trumpists,
The redacted Mueller Report documents a series of activities that show strong evidence of collusion. Or, more precisely, it provides significant evidence that Trump Campaign associates coordinated with, cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support to the Russia/WikiLeaks election interference activities. The Report documents the following actions (each of which is analyzed in detail in Part II):
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”
Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.www.justsecurity.org
Democrats did get him to confirm the most damaging elements of his findings. Under intense questioning, Mr. Mueller said the president had not been cleared of obstructing justice, nor had he been completely exonerated, as Mr. Trump has so often declared; he said that the president had been untruthful in some of his under-oath responses during the probe; and he called Mr. Trump’s encouragement of WikiLeaks “problematic,” to say the least.
Highlights of Robert Mueller’s Testimony to Congress (Published 2019)
A reluctant Mueller reiterated that President Trump “was not exculpated.”www.nytimes.com
LOL I love it when a Trumpkin calls Obama a a prodigious liar- considering that Donald Trump is the most prodigious liar that has ever lived in the White House.A reference to Scott’s "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!"
1.It takes a well-brought up individual to eschew lies and deceit when all his acolytes, and media allies hide and excuse the lies and corruption. But, being brought up in what was a communist household, and praised in every endeavor, how can we blame Obama for becoming such a prodigious liar and reprobate.
Me. I can blame him.
2. But he took one step too far in colluding with Hillary and with the Kremlin to take down a duly elected President. Had he simply turned over the reins of government, he probably would have remained an icon to many. But the Trump Administration seems to finally be gaining traction….especially with the appointment of a saint-among-men (fair, after all, the Democrats called Hussein god), Wm. Barr.
3. Barr’s latest smack in Obama’s kisser, peeling back the trumped up charges against Flynn, produced the latest whopper from Hussein: “Barack Obama told former members of his administration he is disturbed by the Justice Department's move to dismiss its criminal case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.
“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said.
“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic, not just institutional norms, but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places," he added, misstating that Flynn was charged with perjury. Flynn was charged with false statements to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian envoy.” Obama warns 'rule of law is at risk' in leaked audio
4. The only lies, we have learned, are from Obamunists. Flynn didn't lie......
“The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show
Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show
President Obama was aware of the details of then-incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn's intercepted December 2016 phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, apparently surprising then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, according to documents released Thursday as...www.foxnews.com
“Strzok later would intervene and push to keep the Flynn probe open in January 2017, even after the FBI's Washington office signaled it wanted to close it because no "derogatory" information had been unearthed after consulting with other intelligence agencies in an exhaustive search….The stunning development came after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI as his legal fees mounted.
Both during and before the January 24, 2017 White House interview that led to Flynn's prosecution for one count of lying to the FBI, the bureau acknowledged having those full transcripts, raising the question of why agents would need to ask Flynn about what he said during the calls with Kislyak, except potentially as a pretext to obtain a false statements charge.
The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show
So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.
But wait….there’s more…..
And no matter how you spin it- Flynn lied.
He either lied to the FBI- or he lied to the court.
But I love how the Trumpkins try to distract America from Trump's abject failure with the Coronavirus as the body count continues to rise- by once again trying to blame Obama.
So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.
Die he lie about Flynn too?
I am curious why you lunatics keep posting this -
At the time, this was supposedly true -
Then we found out that it wasn't
Which part wasn't true?
Trump saying why he fired Michael Flynn?
Or Flynn pleading guilty about lying to the FBI?
View attachment 336499
In short, Obama knows less than nothing about either the law, or about honesty.
Obama may be a dunce….but not nearly as much as dunce as those who voted for and still support him.
Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School- which means he graduated in the top 10% of this class.
Which means that he knows more about the law- and honesty- than you do.
Before attacking the judge in Michael Flynn's case, Sean Hannity used to praise his integrity
Hannity and other Fox personalities loved Judge Emmet Sullivan -- before they turned on him
The right-wing media machine is particularly upset that Sullivan ordered a hearing to resolve issues that arose as a result of the Trump Justice Department moving suddenly to drop the case, even though Flynn had twice attested to his guilt in open court. Further, reports indicate that key context was left out of the DOJ’s filing.
Put another way: It’s not Sullivan’s conclusions that are making right-wing media rage -- because he hasn’t made any. It is his decision that the resolution of the case be decided in a fair, open hearing -- and not through the corruption of Attorney General Bill Barr's DOJ.
Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama
More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus
OWEBAMA!
What exactly did Obama do?Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama
More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus
OWEBAMA!
Not hardly, petunia, looking for more evidence. We already have him with his hand in the cookie jar. We're hunting the stash of cookies he has hidden in other places.
And Sheriff Barr has a 100 cookie sniffing hounds on the trail. The scent was picked up a long time ago.
Trump doesn’t know, do you?
Harvard Law School is notoriously difficult to get into. Annually, some 7,000 applications apply for some 500 seats. Applicant LSAT scores generally chart in the 98 to 99 percentile range, and GPAs average between 3.80 and 3.95.If Obama's LSAT scores merited admission, we would know about them. We don't. The Obama camp guards those scores, like his SAT scores, more tightly that Iran does its nuclear secrets.
No- Obama hasn't done anything to guard his SAT scores- like all students- those scores are protected by law.
Who does protect his scores- is your Dear Leader- who literally had his personal attorney threaten his schools with lawsuits if they leaked any of his college records.
So again- you are just lying- like your Dear Leader.
Quite a pattern you are developing.
www.eduinreview.com
In short, Obama knows less than nothing about either the law, or about honesty.
Obama may be a dunce….but not nearly as much as dunce as those who voted for and still support him.
Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School- which means he graduated in the top 10% of this class.
Which means that he knows more about the law- and honesty- than you do.
So we agree that every single thing in my post is 100% true, accurate and correct?
Wanna look again?
10. One more reminder: no one provide proof that Hussein Obama knows anything about the law.
Did he learn about law in college????
For starters, Obama did not do nearly well enough at his previous stop, Columbia University, to justify admission to Harvard Law. According to the New York Sun, university spokesman Brian Connolly confirmed that Obama graduated in 1983 with a major in political science but without honors. In the age of affirmative action and grade inflation, a minority in a relatively easy major like political science had to under-perform dramatically to avoid minimal honors. Obama apparently did just that.
Harvard Law School is notoriously difficult to get into. Annually, some 7,000 applications apply for some 500 seats. Applicant LSAT scores generally chart in the 98 to 99 percentile range, and GPAs average between 3.80 and 3.95.If Obama's LSAT scores merited admission, we would know about them. We don't. The Obama camp guards those scores, like his SAT scores, more tightly that Iran does its nuclear secrets.
Obama did not make the Harvard Law Review (HLR) the old-fashioned way, the way HLR's first black editor, Charles Houston, did 70 years prior.To Obama's good fortune, the HLR had replaced a meritocracy in which editors were elected based on grades – the president being the student with the highest academic rank – with one in which half the editors were chosen through a writing competition.This competition, the New York Times reported in 1990, was "meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review."
Unlike most editors, and likely all its presidents, Obama was not a writer. During his tenure at Harvard, he wrote only one heavily edited, unsigned note. …once elected, Obama contributed not one signed word to the HLR or any other law journal. As Matthew Franck has pointed out in National Review Online, "A search of the HeinOnline database of law journals turns up exactly nothing credited to Obama in any law review anywhere at any time." Jack Cashill - National Articles:
In short, Obama knows less than nothing about either the law, or about honesty.
Obama may be a dunce….but not nearly as much as dunce as those who voted for and still support him.
Lets remember Obama is a thug from Chicago. He knifed Hillary in the back repeatedly during the 2008 Dem primary. It doesn't surprise me at all that he was spying on the Trump campaign and going after Trump cabinet picks because that's the kind of guy Obama is, thug.
Yeah to Blueslegend- a black guy with a law degree from Harvard Law- is just another thug. '
While the white guy who was defrauding students at his own 'University' is a 'stand up guy'
Did Flynn lie to pence and the FBI about his conversation with Kislyak?I am curious why you lunatics keep posting this -
At the time, this was supposedly true -
Then we found out that it wasn't
Illegally spying on Americans.What exactly did Obama do?Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama
More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus
OWEBAMA!
Not hardly, petunia, looking for more evidence. We already have him with his hand in the cookie jar. We're hunting the stash of cookies he has hidden in other places.
And Sheriff Barr has a 100 cookie sniffing hounds on the trail. The scent was picked up a long time ago.
Trump doesn’t know, do you?
Who did Obama illegally spy on?
In short, Obama knows less than nothing about either the law, or about honesty.
Obama may be a dunce….but not nearly as much as dunce as those who voted for and still support him.
Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School- which means he graduated in the top 10% of this class.
Which means that he knows more about the law- and honesty- than you do.
So we agree that every single thing in my post is 100% true, accurate and correct?
Wanna look again?
10. One more reminder: no one provide proof that Hussein Obama knows anything about the law.
Did he learn about law in college????
For starters, Obama did not do nearly well enough at his previous stop, Columbia University, to justify admission to Harvard Law. According to the New York Sun, university spokesman Brian Connolly confirmed that Obama graduated in 1983 with a major in political science but without honors. In the age of affirmative action and grade inflation, a minority in a relatively easy major like political science had to under-perform dramatically to avoid minimal honors. Obama apparently did just that.
Harvard Law School is notoriously difficult to get into. Annually, some 7,000 applications apply for some 500 seats. Applicant LSAT scores generally chart in the 98 to 99 percentile range, and GPAs average between 3.80 and 3.95.If Obama's LSAT scores merited admission, we would know about them. We don't. The Obama camp guards those scores, like his SAT scores, more tightly that Iran does its nuclear secrets.
Obama did not make the Harvard Law Review (HLR) the old-fashioned way, the way HLR's first black editor, Charles Houston, did 70 years prior.To Obama's good fortune, the HLR had replaced a meritocracy in which editors were elected based on grades – the president being the student with the highest academic rank – with one in which half the editors were chosen through a writing competition.This competition, the New York Times reported in 1990, was "meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review."
Unlike most editors, and likely all its presidents, Obama was not a writer. During his tenure at Harvard, he wrote only one heavily edited, unsigned note. …once elected, Obama contributed not one signed word to the HLR or any other law journal. As Matthew Franck has pointed out in National Review Online, "A search of the HeinOnline database of law journals turns up exactly nothing credited to Obama in any law review anywhere at any time." Jack Cashill - National Articles:
In short, Obama knows less than nothing about either the law, or about honesty.
Obama may be a dunce….but not nearly as much as dunce as those who voted for and still support him.
There is a woman who goes on the Hugh Hewitt show who was at the Harvard Law review when obama was there....he got the post by enlisting the help of the more Conservative students to defeat the other left wingers trying to get the post....she also said he was a no show editor who would walk in, say hi, then leave......
