Obama’s Tangled Web…. Unraveling

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
A reference to Scott’s "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!"



1.It takes a well-brought up individual to eschew lies and deceit when all his acolytes, and media allies hide and excuse the lies and corruption. But, being brought up in what was a communist household, and praised in every endeavor, how can we blame Obama for becoming such a prodigious liar and reprobate.

Me. I can blame him.


2. But he took one step too far in colluding with Hillary and with the Kremlin to take down a duly elected President. Had he simply turned over the reins of government, he probably would have remained an icon to many. But the Trump Administration seems to finally be gaining traction….especially with the appointment of a saint-among-men (fair, after all, the Democrats called Hussein god), Wm. Barr.



3. Barr’s latest smack in Obama’s kisser, peeling back the trumped up charges against Flynn, produced the latest whopper from Hussein: “Barack Obama told former members of his administration he is disturbed by the Justice Department's move to dismiss its criminal case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.
“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said.

“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic, not just institutional norms, but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places," he added, misstating that Flynn was charged with perjury. Flynn was charged with false statements to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian envoy.” Obama warns 'rule of law is at risk' in leaked audio



4. The only lies, we have learned, are from Obamunists. Flynn didn't lie......

“The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show


“Strzok later would intervene and push to keep the Flynn probe open in January 2017, even after the FBI's Washington office signaled it wanted to close it because no "derogatory" information had been unearthed after consulting with other intelligence agencies in an exhaustive search….The stunning development came after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI as his legal fees mounted.



Both during and before the January 24, 2017 White House interview that led to Flynn's prosecution for one count of lying to the FBI, the bureau acknowledged having those full transcripts, raising the question of why agents would need to ask Flynn about what he said during the calls with Kislyak, except potentially as a pretext to obtain a false statements charge.

The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show



So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.

But wait….there’s more…..
 
Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama

More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus

OWEBAMA!


Not hardly, petunia, looking for more evidence. We already have him with his hand in the cookie jar. We're hunting the stash of cookies he has hidden in other places.

And Sheriff Barr has a 100 cookie sniffing hounds on the trail. The scent was picked up a long time ago.
 
Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama

More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus

OWEBAMA!


Not hardly, petunia, looking for more evidence. We already have him with his hand in the cookie jar. We're hunting the stash of cookies he has hidden in other places.

And Sheriff Barr has a 100 cookie sniffing hounds on the trail. The scent was picked up a long time ago.



1589544473717.png
 
Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama

More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus

OWEBAMA!


Not hardly, petunia, looking for more evidence. We already have him with his hand in the cookie jar. We're hunting the stash of cookies he has hidden in other places.

And Sheriff Barr has a 100 cookie sniffing hounds on the trail. The scent was picked up a long time ago.
What exactly did Obama do?

Trump doesn’t know, do you?
 
Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama

More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus

OWEBAMA!


Not hardly, petunia, looking for more evidence. We already have him with his hand in the cookie jar. We're hunting the stash of cookies he has hidden in other places.

And Sheriff Barr has a 100 cookie sniffing hounds on the trail. The scent was picked up a long time ago.
What exactly did Obama do?

Trump doesn’t know, do you?


Hell ya I know what he did. He gave the green light in December of 2016 to unmask any conversation Flynn had with anyone for political reasons. That's a crime. We know this from the intel committee hearings. You can only unmask someone for national security reasons. Flynn presented NO national security threat. Comey knew by then the Steele dossier was a novel paid for by Hillaryous and obtained from Russian operatives. They needed to create another narrative to support the fake Russian conspiracy.

From there we know there were several more meetings with Obamakov and we have the love birds communications stating the White House wants to know every thing we're doing. This communication was proven when we found out this week that Obama's chief of staff was one of the players granted unmasking.

Obama's fucked. His legacy will now be a dumpster pushed over a cliff with the trash scattered around. That trash would be the scumbags of Obamakovs inner circle.

Stick around, Sheriff Barr is going to give us a great election year show. Funny how Democrats obstruction pushed the timing to an election year.
 
5. Now, Hussein Obama, whose IQ has been open to speculation, claims “And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free.”

Is this true….or another Obama self-serving lie?




Let’s call as our expert witness, well-known Democrat, and frequent CNN guest, Law Professor Johnathan Turley.

“Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the GW Law faculty in 1990, and in 1998, became the youngest chaired professor in the school’s history.”
Jonathan Turley



Professor Turley penned an expose of the liar-in-chief, thus:

“President Obama Declares “There Is No Precedent That Anybody Can Find” For The Flynn Motion [He May Want To Call Eric Holder]

Without doubting the exhaustive search referenced by President Obama, he might have tried calling one “alum”: former Attorney General Eric Holder. Holder moved to dismiss such a case based on prosecutorial errors in front of the very same judge, Judge Emmet Sullivan. [Notably, CNN covered the statements this morning without noting the clearly false claim over the lack of any precedent for the Flynn motion]”
President Obama Declares “There Is No Precedent That Anybody Can Find” For The Flynn Motion [He May Want To Call Eric Holder]


"...clearly false claims..." appear to be Obama's forte.
 
A reference to Scott’s "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!"



1.It takes a well-brought up individual to eschew lies and deceit when all his acolytes, and media allies hide and excuse the lies and corruption. But, being brought up in what was a communist household, and praised in every endeavor, how can we blame Obama for becoming such a prodigious liar and reprobate.

Me. I can blame him.


2. But he took one step too far in colluding with Hillary and with the Kremlin to take down a duly elected President. Had he simply turned over the reins of government, he probably would have remained an icon to many. But the Trump Administration seems to finally be gaining traction….especially with the appointment of a saint-among-men (fair, after all, the Democrats called Hussein god), Wm. Barr.



3. Barr’s latest smack in Obama’s kisser, peeling back the trumped up charges against Flynn, produced the latest whopper from Hussein: “Barack Obama told former members of his administration he is disturbed by the Justice Department's move to dismiss its criminal case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.
“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said.

“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic, not just institutional norms, but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places," he added, misstating that Flynn was charged with perjury. Flynn was charged with false statements to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian envoy.” Obama warns 'rule of law is at risk' in leaked audio



4. The only lies, we have learned, are from Obamunists. Flynn didn't lie......

“The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show


“Strzok later would intervene and push to keep the Flynn probe open in January 2017, even after the FBI's Washington office signaled it wanted to close it because no "derogatory" information had been unearthed after consulting with other intelligence agencies in an exhaustive search….The stunning development came after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI as his legal fees mounted.



Both during and before the January 24, 2017 White House interview that led to Flynn's prosecution for one count of lying to the FBI, the bureau acknowledged having those full transcripts, raising the question of why agents would need to ask Flynn about what he said during the calls with Kislyak, except potentially as a pretext to obtain a false statements charge.

The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show



So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.

But wait….there’s more…..
Another fantastic post, PC. Thank you.
 
A reference to Scott’s "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!"



1.It takes a well-brought up individual to eschew lies and deceit when all his acolytes, and media allies hide and excuse the lies and corruption. But, being brought up in what was a communist household, and praised in every endeavor, how can we blame Obama for becoming such a prodigious liar and reprobate.

Me. I can blame him.


2. But he took one step too far in colluding with Hillary and with the Kremlin to take down a duly elected President. Had he simply turned over the reins of government, he probably would have remained an icon to many. But the Trump Administration seems to finally be gaining traction….especially with the appointment of a saint-among-men (fair, after all, the Democrats called Hussein god), Wm. Barr.



3. Barr’s latest smack in Obama’s kisser, peeling back the trumped up charges against Flynn, produced the latest whopper from Hussein: “Barack Obama told former members of his administration he is disturbed by the Justice Department's move to dismiss its criminal case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.
“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said.

“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic, not just institutional norms, but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places," he added, misstating that Flynn was charged with perjury. Flynn was charged with false statements to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian envoy.” Obama warns 'rule of law is at risk' in leaked audio



4. The only lies, we have learned, are from Obamunists. Flynn didn't lie......

“The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show


“Strzok later would intervene and push to keep the Flynn probe open in January 2017, even after the FBI's Washington office signaled it wanted to close it because no "derogatory" information had been unearthed after consulting with other intelligence agencies in an exhaustive search….The stunning development came after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI as his legal fees mounted.



Both during and before the January 24, 2017 White House interview that led to Flynn's prosecution for one count of lying to the FBI, the bureau acknowledged having those full transcripts, raising the question of why agents would need to ask Flynn about what he said during the calls with Kislyak, except potentially as a pretext to obtain a false statements charge.

The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show



So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.

But wait….there’s more…..
Another fantastic post, PC. Thank you.

You are too kind, bluzie
 
Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama

More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus

OWEBAMA!
Yep.....that's how they get away with it......just ignore the evidence.

FYI, newly released documents prove Obama was the ringleader of it all.
It all depends on whether or not anyone wants to prosecute the prick.
 
Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama

More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus

OWEBAMA!
Yep.....that's how they get away with it......just ignore the evidence.

FYI, newly released documents prove Obama was the ringleader of it all.
It all depends on whether or not anyone wants to prosecute the prick.

I normally don't read posts with language that I don't use, but you have so succinctly summarized Obamagate, I can only say 'kudos!'
 
6. Obama: “And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic, not just institutional norms, but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk.”



Time to get technical about the law-challenged, truth-challenged, Obama:

“The Obama statement is curious on various levels. First, the exhaustive search may have been hampered by the fact that Flynn was never charged with perjury. He was charged with a single count of false statements to a federal investigator under 18 U.S.C. 1001.
I previously wrote that the Justice Department should move to dismiss the case due to recently disclosed evidence and thus I was supportive of the decision of Attorney General Bill Barr.”
President Obama Declares “There Is No Precedent That Anybody Can Find” For The Flynn Motion [He May Want To Call Eric Holder]



“Previously undisclosed documents in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn offer us a chilling blueprint on how top FBI officials not only sought to entrap the former White House aide but sought to do so on such blatantly unconstitutional and manufactured grounds.”


1589548970198.png
 
A reference to Scott’s "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!"



1.It takes a well-brought up individual to eschew lies and deceit when all his acolytes, and media allies hide and excuse the lies and corruption. But, being brought up in what was a communist household, and praised in every endeavor, how can we blame Obama for becoming such a prodigious liar and reprobate.

Me. I can blame him.


2. But he took one step too far in colluding with Hillary and with the Kremlin to take down a duly elected President. Had he simply turned over the reins of government, he probably would have remained an icon to many. But the Trump Administration seems to finally be gaining traction….especially with the appointment of a saint-among-men (fair, after all, the Democrats called Hussein god), Wm. Barr.



3. Barr’s latest smack in Obama’s kisser, peeling back the trumped up charges against Flynn, produced the latest whopper from Hussein: “Barack Obama told former members of his administration he is disturbed by the Justice Department's move to dismiss its criminal case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.
“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said.

“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic, not just institutional norms, but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places," he added, misstating that Flynn was charged with perjury. Flynn was charged with false statements to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian envoy.” Obama warns 'rule of law is at risk' in leaked audio



4. The only lies, we have learned, are from Obamunists. Flynn didn't lie......

“The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show


“Strzok later would intervene and push to keep the Flynn probe open in January 2017, even after the FBI's Washington office signaled it wanted to close it because no "derogatory" information had been unearthed after consulting with other intelligence agencies in an exhaustive search….The stunning development came after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynn’s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI as his legal fees mounted.



Both during and before the January 24, 2017 White House interview that led to Flynn's prosecution for one count of lying to the FBI, the bureau acknowledged having those full transcripts, raising the question of why agents would need to ask Flynn about what he said during the calls with Kislyak, except potentially as a pretext to obtain a false statements charge.

The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.” Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show



So…Flynn was used by the Obama/Russia Hoax as a wedge, tying him to Russia, the bête noire presented in this imbroglio, and by association, Trump as ‘a Russian agent/asset,’ something we’ve learned was totally false.

But wait….there’s more…..
Anyone else watch Brennan shit his pants on live TV yesterday?
He knows he is among the top of the list for facing criminal charges.
 
7. Professor Turley continues exposing the Pinocchio President:

“Second, there is ample precedent for this motion even though, as I noted in the column calling for this action, such dismissals are rare. There is a specific rule created for this purpose. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a) states the government may dismiss an indictment, information or complaint “with leave of the court.” Moreover, such dismissals are tied to other rules mandating such action when there is evidence of prosecutorial misconduct or fundamental questions about the underlying case from the view of the prosecutors. I wrote recently about the serious concerns over the violation of Brady and standing court orders in the production and statements of the prosecutors in the case.
President Obama Declares “There Is No Precedent That Anybody Can Find” For The Flynn Motion [He May Want To Call Eric Holder]



And there is lots of evidence of prosecutorial misconduct.

Lead attorney for Gen. Flynn Sidney Powell argues the government intentionally hid documents in order to protect their prosecution of him.







“…a guilty plea is supposed to be knowing and voluntary….we have evidence that it was coerced….”

Flynn’s previous lawyers “had a secret side deal with the prosecutor….”

“…they hid all the evidence we’ve uncovered that shows he is completely innocent….”

The original law firm, with Eric Holder as a partner, had a deal with the government to make sure he pled guilty.

The FBI needed the prosecution of Flynn in order to keep the obstruction hoax against Trump, going. “Comey knew that they had no evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump Campaign.”

“…we have messages that the 7th floor was in on this…and that’s Comey and McCabe.”
 
8. More from a legal expert who clearly knows more than the dunce, former President:

“Third, there is also case law. In Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U.S. 22 (1977) which addressed precedent under Petite v. United States, 361 U.S. 529 (1960) dealing with the dangers of multiple prosecutions. There are also related cases in Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U. S. 121 (1959), and Abbate v. United States, 359 U. S. 187 (1959). The Rinaldi decision involved a petitioner convicted of state offenses arising out of a robbery, who believed that the government should have moved to dismiss a federal offense arising out of the same robbery under the Department’s Petite policy. The Court laid out the standard for such motions. The thrust of that controversy concerned double jeopardy and dual jurisdictions. However, the point was that the rule is key in protecting such constitutional principles and that courts should be deferential in such moves by the Department: “In light of the parallel purposes of the Government’s Petite policy and the fundamental constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy, the federal courts should be receptive, not circumspect, when the Government seeks leave to implement that policy.”

There are also lower court decisions on this inherent authority.”
President Obama Declares “There Is No Precedent That Anybody Can Find” For The Flynn Motion [He May Want To Call Eric Holder]




In light of this learned exposition, Obama comes off as either a liar or a moron….or both.
 
9. Turley even takes this judge, Sullivan, to task:

“Fourth, there are cases where the Department has moved to dismiss cases on grounds of prosecutorial misconduct or other grounds touching on due process, ethical requirements or other concerns. One that comes to mind is United States v. Stevens where President Obama’s own Attorney General, Eric Holder, asked the same judge in the Flynn case to dismiss that case. That was just roughly ten years ago. As with Flynn, there was an allegation of withheld evidence by prosecutors.

At the time of the motion Holder declared “The Department of Justice must always ensure that any case in which it is involved is handled fairly and consistent with its commitment to justice. Under oftentimes trying conditions, the attorneys who serve in this Department live up to those principles on a daily basis.” What is obvious is the new guidelines issued at the time were honored in the breach during the Flynn prosecution.

it is simply untrue if President Obama is claiming that there is no precedent or legal authority for the motion.” President Obama Declares “There Is No Precedent That Anybody Can Find” For The Flynn Motion [He May Want To Call Eric Holder]


1589561394202.png
 
Still looking for a shred of evidence against Obama

More diversions from Conservatives. Pay no attention to Trumps fumbling performance on Coronavirus

OWEBAMA!


Not hardly, petunia, looking for more evidence. We already have him with his hand in the cookie jar. We're hunting the stash of cookies he has hidden in other places.

And Sheriff Barr has a 100 cookie sniffing hounds on the trail. The scent was picked up a long time ago.
What exactly did Obama do?

Trump doesn’t know, do you?
Illegally spying on Americans.
 

Forum List

Back
Top