Obama's Media Still Ignoring F&F And Solyndra: Nothing To See Here Folks

[Intense]

Do you really think those Drug lords would not have gotten guns without FF?

It was an attempt to track guns.

It was NOT selling guns to the enemy to make money to buy hostages huh?

You silly little knigget: no, it wasn't.

It was a cynical and corrupt attempt to gin up a case to destroy the 2nd amendment.

oh GAWD, here we go with the fucking conspiracies.

F&F was a tragedy of unintended consequences; A game of chess (as opposed to checkers) gone tragically awry. That's all. I know you want it to be something more, something concrete you can exploit to advance your preferred political agenda, but it just isn't.

Incompetence is always a better Defense than Conspiracy. I'd run with that. It has proven so useful, considering History. Just focus away from the Specifics involved, and those that tried to intervene, and you will be okay. The Sheep will believe anything.

 

[boedicca]

Holder is already using "The Incompetence/Sgt. Shultz Defense".

Which begs the issue: if he's incompetent, why is he AG?

 

[Intense]

Holder is already using "The Incompetence/Sgt. Shultz Defense".

Which begs the issue: if he's incompetent, why is he AG?

So he can insure the Current Administration won't get bogged down with Investigations, and Subpoenas.

 

[Cuyo]

Holder is already using "The Incompetence/Sgt. Shultz Defense".

Which begs the issue: if he's incompetent, why is he AG?

Incompetence increases the chances of something going awry, but something going awry does not automatically prove incompetence. Even the best laid of plans can blow up in your face, especially for an operation such as this one.

Was Holder incompetent? I don't know. The blowback that resulted seems to indicate a greater chance that he was, than if everything had gone swimmingly.

But leave this conspiracy theory tripe to the dark basement tin-foil hat crowd.

 

[driveby]

Holder is already using "The Incompetence/Sgt. Shultz Defense".

Which begs the issue: if he's incompetent, why is he AG?

Incompetence increases the chances of something going awry, but something going awry does not automatically prove incompetence. Even the best laid of plans can blow up in your face, especially for an operation such as this one.

Was Holder incompetent? I don't know. The blowback that resulted seems to indicate a greater chance that he was, than if everything had gone swimmingly.

But leave this conspiracy theory tripe to the dark basement tin-foil hat crowd.

Was Holder lying "incompetence"?

Was the White House cussing out the CBS reporter "incompetence"?

 

[boedicca]

*whistle* It's not the crime, it's the coverup. *whistle*

 

[Cuyo]

*whistle* It's not the crime, it's the coverup. *whistle*

Fair enough.

But that would be evidence of a liar, not a conspiracy nor incompetence.

 

[Jackson]

Holder is already using "The Incompetence/Sgt. Shultz Defense".

Which begs the issue: if he's incompetent, why is he AG?

We've been asking that for over a hear. Can the Congress demand a special prosecutor?

 

[Ernie S.]

This morning on Meet The Depressed all they wanted to talk about was how they needed a stronger Republican Party to work with our great leader Obama.

They want to dictate what kind of loyal-opposition they need to continue destroying this country.

They need a Republican Party that is unified and does what they want them to do.



They claim instead that 'All they want to do is stand in the way of progress.' .

What progress????

David Gregory totally ignored Fast & Furious and Solyndra. It was pathetic. It was like nether scandal even existed.

The focus is instead why the Republicans don't want to do anything.

What a joke.



Even though Obama isn't doing anything other then go on Bus Tours and spending all of his time making fun of the GOP, and thanking the Occupiers on Wall Street for their youth and their enthusiasm....and for trashing the place,
the Republicans are being blamed. Even though piles of legislation from the House is sitting on Harry Reid's desk,......

.....even though the Senate hasn't passed a budget in over 890 days.

Nosireee........It's the GOP that's doing nothing.

'Whaaaaaaaaaaa, Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa, they won't work with us.'



Seriously......does anybody buy this crap????

It's quickly becoming clear that Fast & Furious is arguably a worse scandal then Watergate, and Solyndra is quite possibly worse then Enron and Halliburton combined. But the media is ignoring them. All they want to talk about is how weak the Republican field is. They want to focus on Bank of America's new $5 Debit Card charge. Forgetting the fact that we've been getting charged much more than that before the new regulations kicked in from Dodd-Frank. Fees have been cut but when it comes to Democrats a cut equals an increase.

Figure if every time you use your debit card you paid 50 cents. In the run of a month you used it 20 times. $10 is charged to your account. Now only a set fee of $5 is charged to your account. THOSE EVIL RICH BASTARDS!!!
Truth is the only reason they instituted the charges is because of new Obama Administration regulations, but those evil bastards need to pay for stealing from the poor. they need to suffer for providing services to their account-holders. Dick Durbin like a putz said everyone who has a BOA account needs to pull it.

WHAT????

AM I HEARING THIS RIGHT???

IS DICK DURBIN ACTUALLY INSTIGATING ANOTHER RUN ON A BANK???

Once again this illustrates what always happens when you intentionally increase overhead on business.

They pass the charges on to you and me.

Course Obama and his crew know this will happen.....and they plan on taking full advantage of it, which is Class-warfare in a nut-shell.

So.....Fast & Furious was a conspiracy to institute tougher weapons laws.

So are the new regulations that Obama has crammed down the throats of banks and businesses crippling the economy even further.

His support for those layabouts on Wall Street pretty much lets us all know without a doubt that Obama isn't about solutions.

Obama is about protest. Class-warfare. Rioting and violence. Tearing down the system.

To some here they feel it's a long time coming.

To any reasonable person the normal reaction is understandable.

Constructive criticism here, guy. The mixed fonts, colors and text size makes you look like... well Mr Shaman. Your message is much too important to be dismissed off hand because of style.

 

[Ernie S.]

Do you really think those Drug lords would not have gotten guns without FF?

It was an attempt to track guns.

It was NOT selling guns to the enemy to make money to buy hostages huh?

You silly little knigget: no, it wasn't.

It was a cynical and corrupt attempt to gin up a case to destroy the 2nd amendment.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


your insane

His insane, what!

 

[mudwhistle]

Do you really think those Drug lords would not have gotten guns without FF?

It was an attempt to track guns.

It was NOT selling guns to the enemy to make money to buy hostages huh?

JESUS CHRIST ON A STICK....YOU ARE REALLY STUPID!!!!!!!!!



No it's not selling them.....because that would mean we got a profit from it......no WE GAVE THEM TO THEM!!!

What's worse is Stimulus money was used to buy them.....part of the "Shovel Ready Jobs" program.....as in digging the victims' graves.



Sorry lady, but just saying they'll get them anyway is no excuse. In fact it's pathetic.


Imagine if someone shot you dead on the street and it was later discovered that you gave the killer the gun that killed you. Would your family feel better that at least you didn't sell it to him???

 

[Trajan]

the media has been and is in the tank. *shrugs* any doubt disappeared long ago.....

 

[mudwhistle]

the media has been and is in the tank. *shrugs* any doubt disappeared long ago.....

I remember somebody telling me before the 08' election that I was wasting my breath talking about it.

You can't fault me for at least trying to stop this from happening.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It was a cynical and corrupt attempt to gin up a case to destroy the 2nd amendment.

You’ve got to be kidding, what idiocy.

What on earth would be the motive of Obama to ‘destroy’ the Second Amendment.

The Court has ruled clearly as to the interpretation of the Amendment and has incorporated it to the states.

Liberals accept it as settled law and have given up on the issue.

 

[mudwhistle]

It was a cynical and corrupt attempt to gin up a case to destroy the 2nd amendment.

You’ve got to be kidding, what idiocy.

What on earth would be the motive of Obama to ‘destroy’ the Second Amendment.

The Court has ruled clearly as to the interpretation of the Amendment and has incorporated it to the states.

Liberals accept it as settled law and have given up on the issue.

Destroying the Second Amendment is going a bit far.

Ginning up support to tighten gun regulations was most likely the goal.

Take away our guns without changing the Constitution one iota. Kind of like arbitrarily ending off-shore drilling 3 weeks after voicing support for it.

 

[blastoff]

Do you really think those Drug lords would not have gotten guns without FF?

It was an attempt to track guns.

It was NOT selling guns to the enemy to make money to buy hostages huh?

You silly little knigget: no, it wasn't.

It was a cynical and corrupt attempt to gin up a case to destroy the 2nd amendment.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


your insane

you're nuts