If bin Laden had not committed any crimes against American citizens, Clinton had no legal authority to kill him.
Well, Clinton, convicted of perjury, said that in 2002 about that time in 1996
but by 1996 he was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center
so false- really, we all know Clinton's word is useless- he did that to himself
Look even MSNBC which tends to be
part of the FORWARD crap says Clinton missed opportunities
to get him
The tape proves the Clinton administration was aggressively tracking al-Qaida a year before 9/11. But that also raises one enormous question: If the U.S. government had bin Laden and the camps in its sights in real time, why was no action taken against them?
“We were not prepared to take the military action necessary,” said retired Gen. Wayne Downing, who ran counter-terror efforts for the current Bush administration and is now an NBC analyst.
Global dragnet“We should have had strike forces prepared to go in and react to this intelligence, certainly cruise missiles — either air- or sea-launched — very, very accurate, could have gone in and hit those targets,” Downing added.
Gary Schroen, a former CIA station chief in Pakistan, says the White House required the CIA to attempt to capture bin Laden alive, rather than kill him.
What impact did the wording of the orders have on the CIA’s ability to get bin Laden? “It reduced the odds from, say, a 50 percent chance down to, say, 25 percent chance that we were going to be able to get him,” said Schroen.
But if you need to live the world of everything is Bush, Cheney, big oil etc
To each his own