Obama's 13 impeachable offenses

[I.P.Freely]

I don't have to shut up about it.

I concur keep flapping your gums and re-enforcing the stereotype's that worked so well for the republicans in the last two elections

Hey idiot, people might take you more seriously if you would embrace the concept of commas and periods.

whats a period rasclart?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I don't have to shut up about it.

See how that works?

It works fine.

Please continue to exhibit your ignorance and partisan stupidity.

 

[Sallow]

It was off the table because they never had any grounds for it.

Obama should be charged.

He won't, but he should.

Outing Valerie Plame was a crime.

That..was grounds for impeachment and removal from office.

 

[S.J.]

It was off the table because they never had any grounds for it.

Obama should be charged.

He won't, but he should.

Outing Valerie Plame was a crime.

That..was grounds for impeachment and removal from office.

A journalist outed her, idiot. You want to impeach a journalist?

 

[I.P.Freely]

Hey idiot, people might take you more seriously if you would embrace the concept of commas and periods.

whats a period rasclart?

And maybe a capital "W", as well as the missing comma after period? Are you a 3rd grade dropout or something?

nah I was told to dumb down to your level Ras

 

[Sallow]

It was off the table because they never had any grounds for it.

Obama should be charged.

He won't, but he should.

Outing Valerie Plame was a crime.

That..was grounds for impeachment and removal from office.

A journalist outed her, idiot. You want to impeach a journalist?

Novak's dead.

And you can't "impeach" a journalist.

There were many people from the Bush administration shopping the Plame story to the Press. And the connections went up as far as Cheney. It wouldn't have been that hard to build a case.

Just like Abscam and Iran-Contra..the Democrats balked.

 

[S.J.]

Outing Valerie Plame was a crime.

That..was grounds for impeachment and removal from office.

A journalist outed her, idiot. You want to impeach a journalist?

Novak's dead.

And you can't "impeach" a journalist.

There were many people from the Bush administration shopping the Plame story to the Press. And the connections went up as far as Cheney. It wouldn't have been that hard to build a case.

Just like Abscam and Iran-Contra..the Democrats balked.

No shit, Sherlock?! As far as the rest of your babbling, show some proof or shut up.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Aug. 14 2013: Delayed provision in Obamacare to cap out-of-pocket costs, picking and choosing which laws to enforce, which is to exceed authority (per Article 2 Section 3 of the Constitution).

June 17 2013: Obama's National Labor Board recess appointment deemed unconstitutional by the courts. Thus far, Obama has ignored this ruling. .

And there are many more.

'Article 2, Sec. 3 of the Constitution charges the President “shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It doesn’t say that he “should” execute the laws of the United States; it uses the imperative “shall.”
Nor does the Constitution say that the President can pick and choose to enforce some of the laws, or just the ones he likes.
Nor does the Constitution give the President the authority to create new laws. Article 1, Sec. 1 is clear on that point; “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”

Obama's 13 Impeachable Offenses​

​

Then impeach him, or shut up about it.

This is about the partisan right having lost two presidential elections.

It’s also about conservative hypocrisy, where most on the right support ‘the will of the people’ when it comes to denying gay Americans their civil liberties, but the ‘will of the people’ goes out of the window when it comes to seeking to ‘impeach’ a president twice elected as a consequence of the will of the people.

 

[AVG-JOE]

It was off the table because they never had any grounds for it.

Obama should be charged.

He won't, but he should.

With what, exactly?

`​

 

[AVG-JOE]

It was off the table because they never had any grounds for it.

Obama should be charged.

He won't, but he should.

Why?

Name a crime

Because Democrats will block any effort to do what's best for the country over politics.

If having a strong opinion regarding American Politics were a punishable crime, the racial imbalance in our prisons would disappear.

What's the crime? ​

 

[Freewill]

Aug. 14 2013: Delayed provision in Obamacare to cap out-of-pocket costs, picking and choosing which laws to enforce, which is to exceed authority (per Article 2 Section 3 of the Constitution).

June 17 2013: Obama's National Labor Board recess appointment deemed unconstitutional by the courts. Thus far, Obama has ignored this ruling. .

And there are many more.

'Article 2, Sec. 3 of the Constitution charges the President “shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” It doesn’t say that he “should” execute the laws of the United States; it uses the imperative “shall.”
Nor does the Constitution say that the President can pick and choose to enforce some of the laws, or just the ones he likes.
Nor does the Constitution give the President the authority to create new laws. Article 1, Sec. 1 is clear on that point; “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”

Obama's 13 Impeachable Offenses​

​

Then impeach him, or shut up about it.

This is about the partisan right having lost two presidential elections.

It’s also about conservative hypocrisy, where most on the right support ‘the will of the people’ when it comes to denying gay Americans their civil liberties, but the ‘will of the people’ goes out of the window when it comes to seeking to ‘impeach’ a president twice elected as a consequence of the will of the people.

Yeah and according to the left Bush was a war criminal and can't leave the US, oh wait he did.

And Nixon should not have been forced out of office for something so trivial that the left today, if it were Obama, would be screaming the same things you are screaming.

So let's just continue into 1984 and let the president decide who is a threat to the state and have them killed at his direction.

 

[AVG-JOE]

Uh..you guys think that men walking into a store with weapons is so scary that they should be stopped at the door.

But you're perfectly okay with armed convicts waving billy clubs near voting booths.

Got it.

​

Hold it!​

Please provide credible link(s) to this story or withdraw the statement as reactionary bullshit.

Thank you in advance...​

 

[Freewill]

It was off the table because they never had any grounds for it.

Obama should be charged.

He won't, but he should.

Outing Valerie Plame was a crime.

That..was grounds for impeachment and removal from office.

It was proved that Bush didn't out her so why do you keep repeating this BS?

Is killing an innocent American who was NEVER a threat to America a crime?

 

[rightwinger]

Then impeach him, or shut up about it.

This is about the partisan right having lost two presidential elections.

It’s also about conservative hypocrisy, where most on the right support ‘the will of the people’ when it comes to denying gay Americans their civil liberties, but the ‘will of the people’ goes out of the window when it comes to seeking to ‘impeach’ a president twice elected as a consequence of the will of the people.

Yeah and according to the left Bush was a war criminal and can't leave the US, oh wait he did.

And Nixon should not have been forced out of office for something so trivial that the left today, if it were Obama, would be screaming the same things you are screaming.

So let's just continue into 1984 and let the president decide who is a threat to the state and have them killed at his direction.

And thats it in a nutshell

Repblicans still looking for payback for Nixon

Just you wait Dems...just you wait

 

[NYcarbineer]

If the President has committed impeachable offenses, then the House of Representatives, i.e., the REPUBLICAN House, is negligent in it duties for not having drawn up and passed articles of impeachment.

Just one more example of Republican incompetence, apathy, and a total disregard for the good of our Nation.

No wonder we hate you people.

lolol

 

[Freewill]

If the President has committed impeachable offenses, then the House of Representatives, i.e., the REPUBLICAN House, is negligent in it duties for not having drawn up and passed articles of impeachment.

Just one more example of Republican incompetence, apathy, and a total disregard for the good of our Nation.

No wonder we hate you people.

lolol

Wouldn't do any good, there isn't a 2/3s majority so why waste the time. It isn't like the administration kill a 16 year old or anything important.

 

[Freewill]

Outing Valerie Plame was a crime.

That..was grounds for impeachment and removal from office.

A journalist outed her, idiot. You want to impeach a journalist?

Novak's dead.

And you can't "impeach" a journalist.

There were many people from the Bush administration shopping the Plame story to the Press. And the connections went up as far as Cheney. It wouldn't have been that hard to build a case.

Just like Abscam and Iran-Contra..the Democrats balked.

They should have appointed a special prosecutor and had the press go crazy with the story. Oh wait they did. BTW the Obama administration exposed an active CIA agent just the other day, ready to impeach?

 

[Freewill]

This is about the partisan right having lost two presidential elections.

It’s also about conservative hypocrisy, where most on the right support ‘the will of the people’ when it comes to denying gay Americans their civil liberties, but the ‘will of the people’ goes out of the window when it comes to seeking to ‘impeach’ a president twice elected as a consequence of the will of the people.

Yeah and according to the left Bush was a war criminal and can't leave the US, oh wait he did.

And Nixon should not have been forced out of office for something so trivial that the left today, if it were Obama, would be screaming the same things you are screaming.

So let's just continue into 1984 and let the president decide who is a threat to the state and have them killed at his direction.

And thats it in a nutshell

Repblicans still looking for payback for Nixon

Just you wait Dems...just you wait

Oh BS, if it were not for the Republicans Nixon would have never left office. Republicans saw a crime and they did something. Democrats see a crime, like lying under oath or killing an innocent 16 year old, and circle the wagons in protection.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If the President has committed impeachable offenses, then the House of Representatives, i.e., the REPUBLICAN House, is negligent in it duties for not having drawn up and passed articles of impeachment.

Just one more example of Republican incompetence, apathy, and a total disregard for the good of our Nation.

No wonder we hate you people.

lolol

Wouldn't do any good, there isn't a 2/3s majority so why waste the time. It isn't like the administration kill a 16 year old or anything important.

How many 16 year olds did Bush kill invading Iraq?

 

[Freewill]

If the President has committed impeachable offenses, then the House of Representatives, i.e., the REPUBLICAN House, is negligent in it duties for not having drawn up and passed articles of impeachment.

Just one more example of Republican incompetence, apathy, and a total disregard for the good of our Nation.

No wonder we hate you people.

lolol

You mean like the democrats didn't prosecute Bush for his numerous, according to them, war crimes?