It has been proven in emails that the Obama Administration knew that Obamacare would cause citizens to lose their coverage, lose their doctor, and cause prices to skyrocket. But they didn't care. It was all about control and about getting as many people on the government plantation as possible so that they are beholden to government for their most basic needs.
Dear
Rottweiler
If they don't care that this federal bill violates Constitutional principles and beliefs of the HALF of Congress who voted NO on behalf of constitutes, and HALF the Supreme Court also divided clearly by party, of course they have no regard for anything in the way of their political agenda.
You can't prove the results and impact on health care financially without getting into a debate.
But NO ONE disputes the FACT that the vote in Congress
was split with ALL REPUBLICANS VOTING NO
and the Supreme Court vote was also split
in half 5-4
Who voted for Health Care Reform (Obamacare)
Clearly this was divided by political belief.
So enforcing one belief while penalizing the other is unconstitutional,
and treating the belief in right to health care as lawful to establish by govt without consent of
citizens of dissenting beliefs, but treating right to life as barred from govt if people don't agree to that belief
is DISCRIMINATION by CREED.
There is no denying that people of dissenting beliefs
expressed this dissent and thus had the bill passed defended and enforced
without our consent and in violation of our beliefs which were clearly stated and KNOWN.
This is willful IGNORANCE if not incompetence and inability to
perceive of much less respect the equal rights and beliefs of others.
All because of political bias, belief and agenda.
So if this is how party politics is abused -- to collude to violate the equal
civil rights of others -- perhaps parties should be BANNED from pushing political beliefs through govt.
Just like religious beliefs are held to a Constitutional standard:
you can practice this freely as individuals but cannot abuse govt or public resources/institutions
to endorse, enforce, or impose a belief, especially if it conflicts or excludes the beliefs of other citizens,
but must have CONSENT of citizens if you are going to have such a policy in govt.
If people AGREE to a reference to God which is faith based, that can remain.
If people DISAGREE with references to prayers or crosses, those are removed.
So if people can demand to remove Christmas trees, Nativity scenes, Bibles etc.
Why is it attacked if people demand to remove homosexual references, same
sex marriage, and other personal choices from govt that not all people believe in.
And just keep that private.
Same with health care policies and let citizens choose what programs they want to participate in to cover health care.
What crime have citizens committed to justify depriving us of our liberty and right to choose health care programs and our labor to pay for health care through free market means
instead of paying for insurance or govt penalties as a requirement?