you are delusional. You give him credit for destroying our economy, our culture, our international reputation, and our military, and you do that because he "accomplished what he was elected to do" ?
are you saying that americans voted for him because they wanted the country ruined?
once again, WTF is wrong with you?
Interesting thoughts...other than hyperbole, can you identify how exactly these things are "destroyed"?
Do you know what destroyed means?
doubled the national debt
military at pre WW2 levels
more on welfare than ever before
ISIS
more on food stamps than ever before
national monuments being removed for PC
gay marriage
longest period of high unemployment in history
obamacare lies
benghazi lies
boys in girls locker rooms
anti-Christian
pro-muslim
put radical muslims in charge in Libya and Egypt
dumped on Israel
made Putin a world leader
allowed Iran to get nuclear weapons
the Bergdahl trade
nothing this guys has done has helped this country.
you can like and worship him if you want, intelligent people know better.
Again I ask....do you know what destroyed means?
Lets start with you telling us how the military was destroyed
Our military is larger than the next 14 nations combined....how is that destroyed?
We are at pre WW2 levels, military morale is low under this CIC.
That isn't destroyed. I don't even know what you mean by "We are at pre WW2 levels", in what? Troop number, fish eaten?
Military moral is low? Meaning what? Meaning soldiers aren't afraid of being sent to Iraq and getting blown up, but are afraid of going to Afghanistan to be blown up?
But why is moral lower?
http://taskandpurpose.com/real-reason-poor-state-military-morale/
"According to the Military Times piece, satisfaction with pay and allowances declined from 87% to 44% from 2009 to 2014. Military pay has kept up with inflation and then some for the
past several years. That’s not to say that military pay is a princely fortune, though it
stacks up pretty well against the civilian world. "
So, moral over pay dropped, even though pay kept up with inflation and beyond. Hmm. Seems strange to me.
"Now that deployments have decreased, the worry is that morale is suffering for want of a mission. Service members complain about deployments, but they also complain when they don’t deploy."
Maybe a lot of the present military signed up when they knew they'd be sent to Iraq or Afghanistan. Now there is less chance of this happening, are soldiers getting annoyed that they're not going?
"Today, units have to swap equipment just to deploy; new personnel go forward with inadequate training; and stateside support units, such as depots and training facilities, have to support deploying units with people and equipment. The military is like a subsistence farmer who’s eating his seed corn — it works for awhile, but a reckoning is coming."
Well this is an issue of money, isn't it. It's an issue of whether Americans want higher taxes, higher debt, or better troop moral.
Now, the Republicans will complain Obama has taxes too high, they'll complain the debt is way too high AND they'll complain about troop moral.
What does it boil down to? It boils down to Bush going into Iraq and Afghanistan and doing the job on the cheap and not getting the job in either Iraq or Afghanistan done in sufficient time, which means it rolled over to Obama who is then hit with the recession which lowered taxes coming in, increased spending going out, plus the wars on top which he's tried to deal with with more troops in Afghanistan and a pull out in Iraq, but this still puts strains on the debt and on taxes, and also means there is less money to spend on the military.
And he gets blamed for all things happening at the same time, but, and this is important, without Iraq, this wouldn't have been much of an issue in the first place.