Obama Won!

picture.php
 
This picture of a guy that you are making fun of, probably knows how to sustain himself in life better than any government dependent or even better than any inner city folk do that number in the millions now, in which has been made dependent on government, yet he is made fun of because of his looks ? wow....

This is the hypocrysy of the left, where as they cannot produce hardly anyone that actually knows how to sustain themselves without a crutch in life or rather they have surrounded themselves by surface security in their lives in which ends up being hardly any security at all in the end, where as if the slightest fail happens to them, then they have to look hard to the government to bail them out or rescue them from their own weaknesses in life. Now the government loves to exploit this weakness and capitalize on it now, but the left are to dum to realize what is going on, but they worship that which can keep them in free stuff, yet with other peoples money it is all being done, and they will do this just as long as their numbers stay big enough to keep voting the left into office, yet again at the expense of other peoples money it is all being done.

What a mess this nation has allowed now for all of this to become, but it can be reversed engineered if we just get the ball rolling in the other direction, and this for all Americans again.
 
Last edited:
"The Obama campaign's resurrection of "liar" as a political tool is odious because it has such a repellent pedigree. It dates to the sleazy world of fascist and totalitarian propaganda in the 1930s. It was part of the milieu of stooges, show trials and dupes. These were people willing to say anything to defeat their opposition. Denouncing people as liars was at the center of it. The idea was never to elevate political debate but to debauch it.
"The purpose of calling someone a liar then was not merely to refute their ideas or arguments. It was to nullify them, to eliminate them from participation in politics. That's what is so unsettling about a David Axelrod or David Plouffe following accusations of dishonesty and lies with "whether that person should sit in the Oval Office." And that is followed by President Obama himself feeding the new line in stump speeches without himself ever using the L-word."

Henninger: Obama and the L-Word - WSJ.com
 
"
No one has worked harder to revive this low-rent tactic than New York Times columnist Paul Krugman. To my knowledge, Mr. Krugman is the only columnist writing for a major publication in U.S. journalism who has so routinely and repetitively accused people of being liars.
It began with the charge that Bush lied about WMD and became almost banal in its repetition after that. In a September 2008 piece on the GOP convention, "Blizzard of Lies," the New York Times' heir to Reston, Wicker, Krock and Safire blew the floodgates: "they're all out-and-out lies"; "the blizzard of lies"; "a grotesque lie" and "the McCain campaign's lies." The Obama campaign is saying "Romney lied," because Paul Krugman made it the coin of their realm.
The L-word's strength is directly proportional to the rarity and appropriateness of its use. Today in our politics it is as skuzzily routine as the F-bomb has become among 15-year-old girls on the New York City subways. This is not progress."

Henninger: Obama and the L-Word - WSJ.com
 
Why are liberals working so hard to keep republicans from getting their message out to all legit voters, and/or their promotion for legality to win the day within voting, instead of the left courting or hoping for fraud to help win the day instead ?
 
Last edited:
Isn't that what someone said about the Affordable Health Care Law before it was shoved down everyone's throat by Obama and company, "just vote on it, and then we can all see what it has for us that is hidden inside afterwards" ? Hypocrisy once again maybe ?

Hmm who was it that said this, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the crew ?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top