Obama warns congress not to stop him on Iran "deal"

Clementine

Platinum Member
Dec 18, 2011
12,919
4,825
350
Arrogant asshole. He actually tells congress they are allowed to have an opinion, but better not try to get involved. The worst part is that Obama is acting as Iran's agent. He isn't standing up for America or any of our allies. All of Obama's foreign policy has centered on helping the radical Muslims advance their agenda.



"You don’t want to cross the king! Over the weekend, in his royal audience with the New York Times, his excellency Barack Obama made it clear to Congress that they’re free to have opinions, but they better not try to stop him making a "deal" with Iran.

"My hope is that we can find something that allows Congress to express itself but does not encroach on traditional presidential prerogatives and ensures that if in fact we get a good deal that we can go ahead and implement it," he said.

Right, Congress can have "free expression" but better not try to use any powers granted by the Constitution (that crusty old thing).

However, maybe for once our elected representatives might actually represent us. Even the Democrats!

Amazingly, New York Senator Chuck Shumer ‘has endorsed passage of a measure opposed by President Barack Obama that would give Congress a chance to reject the administration-brokered nuclear framework deal with Iran," according to Newsmax."



http://allenbwest.com/2015/04/obama-to-congress-you-can-have-an-opinion-on-iran-but-dont-dare-try-this/
 
That's Obama for you, threatening his political enemies. He's a poor excuse for a president.
 
rs_560x415-131105082119-560-zach-jc-111313.jpg
 
Gee, expecting a president to work with congress is what the left calls whacky. Of course, they radicals think people who follow the constitution are extremists these days.

Telling congress members that it's okay to have an opinion (didn't know they needed his okay for that) but that they better not try to stop him from doing as he pleases with Iran talks is purely tyrannical.
 
Gee, expecting a president to work with congress is what the left calls whacky. Of course, they radicals think people who follow the constitution are extremists these days.

Telling congress members that it's okay to have an opinion (didn't know they needed his okay for that) but that they better not try to stop him from doing as he pleases with Iran talks is purely tyrannical.
But let a Republican president circumvent a Democratic Congress and see what happens.
 
So what the fuck is the difference between obie and the iranians? They both want the same goals so why the hell should we trust a president to negotiate with a terrorist group in our favor? All the while we get these left wing pricks saying if we don't support obie we hate America. When the president supports your enemies position he moved himself to the other side. And that's our fault for not supporting him? Fuck you.
 
BrownDung probably JUST heard some far right wing radical radio host spew some nonsense and RUSHED to the computer to spread the claptrap.

Gotta link liar?
 
The President does NOT have authority to create a binding deal with a foreign power without the approval of the Senate. No matter what he claims.

Actually, yes he does.

But only as an 'Executive Agreement' that can be overturned by the next President.

the Lying Cocksucker in Chief is counting on getting this SHIT deal pushed through, getting it approved by the commies and totalitarian scum at the UN and tying the hands of the next President.

Then, when the next President decides he or she want to shit-can the deal, it will be VERY difficult.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth, people.

I keep telling you that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top