- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,137
- 47,290
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #121
It takes a special kind of idiocy to believe that.Nope, there was no other reason.Wrong, turd. If it has any possible private purpose, then it's not a campaign contribution. There are a lot of reasons Trump might want to pay off Stormy even if he isn't running for office. Therefore, it's not a campaign contribution. It happened during the campaign only because Stormy thought that was the best time to strike. All the cockroaches come crawling out of the woodwork when you are running for office, especially when your opponent is paying them off.Sorry, but paying off a woman regarding an affair that occurred 10 years before....right before an election in order to hide that fact from the public IS a "campaign contribution"...and no one but idiots like you dispute thatROFL! What a moron. It wasn't a campaign contribution. According to the snowflake theory, if Trump bought a new suit, it's a campaign contribution.And to be clear..had Trump cut a check to Stormy...and then reported it...it WOULD have been legal.
He didn't. He CONSPIRED (a crime) to HIDE that payment and committed a variety of crimes in making those payments through various sources.
By "conspired" you mean he didn't tell the cops.
You snowflakes are so desperate. I'm going to enjoy a big cup of snowflake tears when all this ends and Trump finishes his eighth year in office.