Obama rips GOP ‘obstruction’

[Nutz]

To be "bi-partisan" simply to be "bi-partisan" is silly.

Obama is a lawless man, he picks and chooses what laws he wants to follow/enforce and which ones he doesn't.

There is no working with him.

What happened first, Obama unwilling to work with the opposition or the opposition unwilling to work with Obama?

Let's try this again.

Obama is a lawless man, he does NOT follow/enforce any law he disagrees with.

THAT has nothing to do with "working" with one another.

From day one his attitude was "I won".

2 years later America said **** you and gave Repubs the House, it is just that simple.
We did not send them there to work with Obama.

Again, not so hard to understand really.

That I can appreciate. But working against and obstructionism are 2 different things. It would be one thing if the Teapers presented legislation to improve America (besides trying to rescind Obamacare). What legislation have the Teapers introduced? What alternatives have they offered to any issue? All I see is manufactured controversies and an effort to divide America. They are just hurling as many allegations as possible, hoping something sticks so they can spend more taxpayer money on nonsense. The IRS scandal has teeth...nothing else meets the muster. And now Boehner is caving into the Teapers and plans to sue the President...what is that gonna accomplish except waste money and tie the hands of any future President?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Congress changed hands, what happened to "we won"?

The people spoke in 2010 and they rejected Democrat Law making

 

[Nutz]

To be "bi-partisan" simply to be "bi-partisan" is silly.

Obama is a lawless man, he picks and chooses what laws he wants to follow/enforce and which ones he doesn't.

There is no working with him.

What happened first, Obama unwilling to work with the opposition or the opposition unwilling to work with Obama?

The blue dog democrats unwilling to walk lock step with the far left. Obamacare did what it was designed to do, to root out all the blue dogs and get far left members in their place.

The republicans did not have the numbers to block passage, so it was all on the (D)'s, it was once again the far left shredding any opposition with in their own party. Much like it did openly in the late 70's.

Wow, you actually changed your liberal media tune...and with something of notable truth. I am impressed. Obama did take the GOP out of the picture...I can agree with that. My issue is the childish response led by the Teapers...obstructionism and divisiveness.

 

[Antares]

What happened first, Obama unwilling to work with the opposition or the opposition unwilling to work with Obama?

Let's try this again.

Obama is a lawless man, he does NOT follow/enforce any law he disagrees with.

THAT has nothing to do with "working" with one another.

From day one his attitude was "I won".

2 years later America said **** you and gave Repubs the House, it is just that simple.
We did not send them there to work with Obama.

Again, not so hard to understand really.

That I can appreciate. But working against and obstructionism are 2 different things. It would be one thing if the Teapers presented legislation to improve America (besides trying to rescind Obamacare). What legislation have the Teapers introduced? What alternatives have they offered to any issue? All I see is manufactured controversies and an effort to divide America. They are just hurling as many allegations as possible, hoping something sticks so they can spend more taxpayer money on nonsense. The IRS scandal has teeth...nothing else meets the muster. And now Boehner is caving into the Teapers and plans to sue the President...what is that gonna accomplish except waste money and tie the hands of any future President?

The President of the United swears to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States.

It demands he "faithfully execute" the laws passed by Congress, not rule by dictate and fiat.

If Bush were doing this we ALL would be clamoring for impeachment.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Obama is a pathological liar, how do you trust him?

 

[OKTexas]

What happened first, Obama unwilling to work with the opposition or the opposition unwilling to work with Obama?

Let's try this again.

Obama is a lawless man, he does NOT follow/enforce any law he disagrees with.

THAT has nothing to do with "working" with one another.

From day one his attitude was "I won".

2 years later America said **** you and gave Repubs the House, it is just that simple.
We did not send them there to work with Obama.

Again, not so hard to understand really.

That I can appreciate. But working against and obstructionism are 2 different things. It would be one thing if the Teapers presented legislation to improve America (besides trying to rescind Obamacare). What legislation have the Teapers introduced? What alternatives have they offered to any issue? All I see is manufactured controversies and an effort to divide America. They are just hurling as many allegations as possible, hoping something sticks so they can spend more taxpayer money on nonsense. The IRS scandal has teeth...nothing else meets the muster. And now Boehner is caving into the Teapers and plans to sue the President...what is that gonna accomplish except waste money and tie the hands of any future President?

Presidents hands are intended to be tied, your dear leader has already lost 13 unanimous decisions before the supreme court and several other majority decisions. I think that is a record that will stand for ever, of course he's all about being first, isn't he? For being a supposed constitutional scholar the dude ain't too bright.

 

[PoliticalTorch]

It's my right as an American to not give a **** about you if I choose so.

And that speaks full volumes about the type of heartless, cold and callous person you really are. And that's nothing to be proud about.

You have no idea what kind of person I am and I happen to be quite proud of the fact that I have zero regard for a whiny little attention whore like you. You have a lot of growing up to do.

Oh BIG Man! BIG Man!! But with a pea-sized brain, that matches your 'other pair', for logic.

 

[Antares]

It's my right as an American to not give a **** about you if I choose so.

And that speaks full volumes about the type of heartless, cold and callous person you really are. And that's nothing to be proud about.

Let's just cut to the chase Torch How much money should we give to the Government to"help" the poor?

[MENTION=49463]PoliticalTorch[/MENTION]

 

[PoliticalTorch]

It's my right as an American to not give a **** about you if I choose so.

And that speaks full volumes about the type of heartless, cold and callous person you really are. And that's nothing to be proud about.

Let's just cut to the chase Torch How much money should we give to the Government to"help" the poor?

Quite frankly that depends entirely on how big or how small your heart truly is.

 

[blackhawk]

If all Obama and the Democrats are going to offer the American people is more of the same failed policies of the last five years then by all means obstruct.

Wrong! The innovative ideas to move the country forward are being offered by President Obama and the Democrats but Republicans continue to obstruct their implementation just so they don't have to give one ounce of credit to the president for his efforts and that's Wrong! The country needs Republicans Out Of Office ASAP so they can continue to benefit from what Democrats offer them which is something Solid instead of the CUTS, CUTS and More CUTS they are so used to getting under Republican administrations and seeing the wealthy benefit far greater than the Middle Class or the poor ever could. When people vote and pay their taxes they deserve to get far better than what they are getting from Republicans!

Tax the rich and spend more is not innovative I would give you a dollar to buy a clue with but I don't support welfare and that includes corporate welfare before you ask.

 

[Antares]

And that speaks full volumes about the type of heartless, cold and callous person you really are. And that's nothing to be proud about.

Let's just cut to the chase Torch How much money should we give to the Government to"help" the poor?

Quite frankly that depends entirely on how big or how small your heart truly is.

That is a cop out.

You and Obama have all of these wonderful ideas, they all have to be paid for.....you two MUST have a dollar figure in mind?

Certainly you understand that Government compulsion does not rely on the size of one's "heart"?

How much of the average america's money will you need?

 

[blackhawk]

Let's just cut to the chase Torch How much money should we give to the Government to"help" the poor?

Quite frankly that depends entirely on how big or how small your heart truly is.

That is a cop out.

You and Obama have all of these wonderful ideas, they all have to be paid for.....you two MUST have a dollar figure in mind?

Certainly you understand that Government compulsion does not rely on the size of one's "heart"?

How much of the average america's money will you need?

Here is the new Democrat tax code.
Line 1- How much do you earn.
Line 2- Send it in.

 

[Nutz]

Let's try this again.

Obama is a lawless man, he does NOT follow/enforce any law he disagrees with.

THAT has nothing to do with "working" with one another.

From day one his attitude was "I won".

2 years later America said **** you and gave Repubs the House, it is just that simple.
We did not send them there to work with Obama.

Again, not so hard to understand really.

That I can appreciate. But working against and obstructionism are 2 different things. It would be one thing if the Teapers presented legislation to improve America (besides trying to rescind Obamacare). What legislation have the Teapers introduced? What alternatives have they offered to any issue? All I see is manufactured controversies and an effort to divide America. They are just hurling as many allegations as possible, hoping something sticks so they can spend more taxpayer money on nonsense. The IRS scandal has teeth...nothing else meets the muster. And now Boehner is caving into the Teapers and plans to sue the President...what is that gonna accomplish except waste money and tie the hands of any future President?

Presidents hands are intended to be tied, your dear leader has already lost 13 unanimous decisions before the supreme court and several other majority decisions. I think that is a record that will stand for ever, of course he's all about being first, isn't he? For being a supposed constitutional scholar the dude ain't too bright.

You mean that mulatto guy...the one who is President (although teapers don't care about race and aren't racist pussies)?

I mentioned before, the battle between estates is nothing new and there has been and will be Supreme Court Decisions in all administrations. You are just spewing hyperbole...I wonder if it is because the President is mulatto!

You teapers kill me!

 

[Nutz]

Let's try this again.

Obama is a lawless man, he does NOT follow/enforce any law he disagrees with.

THAT has nothing to do with "working" with one another.

From day one his attitude was "I won".

2 years later America said **** you and gave Repubs the House, it is just that simple.
We did not send them there to work with Obama.

Again, not so hard to understand really.

That I can appreciate. But working against and obstructionism are 2 different things. It would be one thing if the Teapers presented legislation to improve America (besides trying to rescind Obamacare). What legislation have the Teapers introduced? What alternatives have they offered to any issue? All I see is manufactured controversies and an effort to divide America. They are just hurling as many allegations as possible, hoping something sticks so they can spend more taxpayer money on nonsense. The IRS scandal has teeth...nothing else meets the muster. And now Boehner is caving into the Teapers and plans to sue the President...what is that gonna accomplish except waste money and tie the hands of any future President?

The President of the United swears to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States.

It demands he "faithfully execute" the laws passed by Congress, not rule by dictate and fiat.

If Bush were doing this we ALL would be clamoring for impeachment.

But you weren't...the libs were, but no one else was. Most of the hoopla over Obama is manufactured nonsense and extreme partisanship by the teapers.

 

[Ibentoken]

That I can appreciate. But working against and obstructionism are 2 different things. It would be one thing if the Teapers presented legislation to improve America (besides trying to rescind Obamacare). What legislation have the Teapers introduced? What alternatives have they offered to any issue? All I see is manufactured controversies and an effort to divide America. They are just hurling as many allegations as possible, hoping something sticks so they can spend more taxpayer money on nonsense. The IRS scandal has teeth...nothing else meets the muster. And now Boehner is caving into the Teapers and plans to sue the President...what is that gonna accomplish except waste money and tie the hands of any future President?

The President of the United swears to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States.

It demands he "faithfully execute" the laws passed by Congress, not rule by dictate and fiat.

If Bush were doing this we ALL would be clamoring for impeachment.

But you weren't...the libs were, but no one else was. Most of the hoopla over Obama is manufactured nonsense and extreme partisanship by the teapers.

You still haven't explained what is so extreme about the TP. Wanna try again?

 

[Ibentoken]

One of you smart leftists tell us whether citizens work for the state or is the state supposed to work for the citizens? Spin it.

 

[HelenaHandbag]

Did I hear Dear Leader whining about obstruction?

Senate sitting on 290 bills already passed by House; tension mounts | TheHill

 

[RoadVirus]

The GOP doesn't give a shit about the 47%.




Obama rips GOP 'obstruction' | MSNBC

President Barack Obama pointedly criticized Republicans on Saturday over what he called “obstruction” that “keeps the system rigged for those at the top, and rigged against the middle class.”

Meanwhile, you have Hairy Reid putting bills into his "Ignore" basket in the Senate.

 

[OKTexas]

That I can appreciate. But working against and obstructionism are 2 different things. It would be one thing if the Teapers presented legislation to improve America (besides trying to rescind Obamacare). What legislation have the Teapers introduced? What alternatives have they offered to any issue? All I see is manufactured controversies and an effort to divide America. They are just hurling as many allegations as possible, hoping something sticks so they can spend more taxpayer money on nonsense. The IRS scandal has teeth...nothing else meets the muster. And now Boehner is caving into the Teapers and plans to sue the President...what is that gonna accomplish except waste money and tie the hands of any future President?

Presidents hands are intended to be tied, your dear leader has already lost 13 unanimous decisions before the supreme court and several other majority decisions. I think that is a record that will stand for ever, of course he's all about being first, isn't he? For being a supposed constitutional scholar the dude ain't too bright.

You mean that mulatto guy...the one who is President (although teapers don't care about race and aren't racist pussies)?

I mentioned before, the battle between estates is nothing new and there has been and will be Supreme Court Decisions in all administrations. You are just spewing hyperbole...I wonder if it is because the President is mulatto!

You teapers kill me!

Really, is that all you got? You're just like your dear leader, not a freaking clue. Now how about you telling the rest of us why even his uber liberal appointments are going against him?

 

[Stephanie]

oh wow, Obama is RIPPING someone today

He be tough man/boy

how embarrassing after six years of hearing him whine