Don't get me wrong. I can't abide Pres. Obama. But in criticizing him, fair is still fair. And the fact that he couldn't and didn't veto the Act is not ground for fair criticism, in my humble estimation.
It's an utterly fair criticism of Sallow's claim that Obama was supposedly opposed to a law that (a) he signed and (b) his lawyers vigorously defended before the court. Obama supporters can't have it both ways.
Last edited: