Obama regime considers military action against Syrian government

[Bleipriester]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

 

[Auld Phart]

Yes, I know, it's not Syrias border

 

[Fenton Lum]

Endless war, embrace it, it's bipartisan. And don't forget to bitch about the deficit.

 

[TooTall]

Endless war, embrace it, it's bipartisan. And don't forget to bitch about the deficit.

The only one that can do anything about it is the Commander in Chief, with or without Congressional support.

 

[Kosh]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

What is Obama going to do? Let them use nukes against his own people?

 

[theHawk]

Quagmire.

Obama is trying to get us into a war with Russia. Americans don't give a rats ass about Syria nor should they. No more US resources should be wasted in this debacle. Pull the plug on the whole thing and let Muslims figure it out. If the Russians want to remain involved with the Shi'ite side, let'em. Sooner or later they will get burned by their Muslim "allies" just as we continually get burned by our Sunni "allies" every few weeks by a new Islamist attack.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Endless war, embrace it, it's bipartisan. And don't forget to bitch about the deficit.

The only one that can do anything about it is the Commander in Chief, with or without Congressional support.

Not true. Russia can put an end to obama's nonsense then win the peace in Aleppo.

Nothing is going to make obama stop supporting the terrorists. Hilly will do the same.

Send a couple of planes over New York and Washington. Bloody his nose. Send obambam into his cave hiding.

 

[JakeStarkey]

To the OP: good.

 

[Bleipriester]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

What is Obama going to do? Let them use nukes against his own people?

There is no use of force against civilians by the Syrian and Russian governments.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Endless war, embrace it, it's bipartisan. And don't forget to bitch about the deficit.

The only one that can do anything about it is the Commander in Chief, with or without Congressional support.

Not true. Russia can put an end to obama's nonsense then win the peace in Aleppo.Nothing is going to make obama stop supporting the terrorists. Hilly will do the same.Send a couple of planes over New York and Washington. Bloody his nose. Send obambam into his cave hiding.

The far rwnjs and alt right are supporting the terrorists by interfering with US foreign policy. Tipsy is seditiously supporting the Russians.

 

[pwjohn]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

There's nothing to win over there.

 

[Kosh]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

What is Obama going to do? Let them use nukes against his own people?

There is no use of force against civilians by the Syrian and Russian governments.

Wrong!

Syria's chemical weapons stockpile - BBC News

 

[JakeStarkey]

Quagmire.

Obama is trying to get us into a war with Russia. Americans don't give a rats ass about Syria nor should they. No more US resources should be wasted in this debacle. Pull the plug on the whole thing and let Muslims figure it out. If the Russians want to remain involved with the Shi'ite side, let'em. Sooner or later they will get burned by their Muslim "allies" just as we continually get burned by our Sunni "allies" every few weeks by a new Islamist attack.

You idiot. No one wants a war with Russia.

 

[Bleipriester]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

There's nothing to win over there.

Yes, there is. At first, the Syrians can get rid of the terrorists. A big win, don´t you think? Looks like the US fears to lose not only the humanitarian mask but also the military superiority mask. Everyone who still supports this bunch of bloodthirsty warmongers, knows exactly he´s on the wrong side.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

No more blood for oil. No endless wars. No boots on the ground.

The United States is not interested in fighting. Russia can do what it wants, just as soon as Vlad puts his cigarette out in obumble's eye.

 

[Bleipriester]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

What is Obama going to do? Let them use nukes against his own people?

There is no use of force against civilians by the Syrian and Russian governments.

Wrong!

Syria's chemical weapons stockpile - BBC News

And what does this prove? That you have no proof, no point and no argument?

 

[theHawk]

Quagmire.

Obama is trying to get us into a war with Russia. Americans don't give a rats ass about Syria nor should they. No more US resources should be wasted in this debacle. Pull the plug on the whole thing and let Muslims figure it out. If the Russians want to remain involved with the Shi'ite side, let'em. Sooner or later they will get burned by their Muslim "allies" just as we continually get burned by our Sunni "allies" every few weeks by a new Islamist attack.

You idiot. No one wants a war with Russia.

Oh right, Obama just has us in a proxy war with them, that's all. Surely it will never escalate to anything more than that. Oh, except the OP has pointed out that Obama now wants to use the military to directly attack the Syrian government. A government that never attacked us or poses any threat to us.

Amazing how you libtards keep justifying these stupid wars.

 

[The Great Goose]

He want's to bog the next President down in a war.

 

[Kosh]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

What is Obama going to do? Let them use nukes against his own people?

There is no use of force against civilians by the Syrian and Russian governments.

Wrong!

Syria's chemical weapons stockpile - BBC News

And what does this prove? That you have no proof, no point and no argument?

Proof that your comments were wrong about the force used by Syrian and Russian governments!

Casualties of the Syrian Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Although you can include Obama in that as well!

Civilian Death Toll From Coalition Airstrikes in Syria Could Be Single Largest in U.S.-Led War on ISIS

 

[Dale Smith]

The Obama regime currently discusses a possible - limited - military action against Syria and the options discussed are classified. However, covertly conducted strikes against air bases are discussed. The motivation of the Hippies ("ceasefire, ceasefire", remember?) that suddenly exchanged their joints with guns again, is the approaching defeat the US has to suffer in Syria. The winner in Aleppo is considered the winner of the war and the al-Qaeda terrorists which the US has imposed on the civilians (whom they claim to care for) are currently losing. The entire discussion ignores completely that Russia is active in Syria and that there will be escalation in case the Obama regime directly aids al-Qaeda and ISIS with strikes on the Syrian forces. The chance of an US intervention is quite small.

Obama administration considering strikes on Assad, again
(full of uncritical and literal copy & paste of government statements and disgusting propaganda lies)

So USA.INC's ISIS/al qaeda band of mercenaries are not getting the job done?

What has Syria done that has put it's self in the cross hairs of USA.INC? Oh, that's right...Syria has resources this corporate entity covets and it doesn't have a Rothschild central bank. USA.INC is fine with despots as long as they are despot puppets of USA.INC.