Here's a question I'm not positive of the answer to.

People are allowed to believe the election was stolen, just as you are allowed to believe they weren’t. How many Dems believe 2016 was stolen from Hillary?

Fair point and a good example of why both parties need to end.
 
Has anyone trump has appointed or nominated to a position in his upcoming admin unequivocally said trump lost the 2020 election? Cuz.........you know.........he lost.
Beyond the obvious lack of qualifications as well as disqualifying aspects of their resumes, one could argue he has assembled a group of delusional candidates who do not accept that particular reality.
What could go wrong?
What possible difference does it make what anybody thinks about who won the 2020 election when it comes to governing now? The only thing I can see is promoting policy that prevents future elections from being in doubt.

Trump is choosing people with special knowledge, attitude, motivation and proven capability to get things done in a MAGA agenda.

The MAGA agenda is a government of, for and by the people promoting a strong, free, secure, prosperous America with liberty, choices, options, opportunity and more prosperity for all American demographics regardless of who they are, who they voted for, or what they think about the 2020 election. And you can also throw promotion of world peace into that equation.
 
Last edited:
Has anyone trump has appointed or nominated to a position in his upcoming admin unequivocally said trump lost the 2020 election? Cuz.........you know.........he lost.
Beyond the obvious lack of qualifications as well as disqualifying aspects of their resumes, one could argue he has assembled a group of delusional candidates who do not accept that particular reality.
What could go wrong?

So why did 10MM Biden "Voters" sit out voting for the black lady in 24?
 

Meet the Billionaires & Multi-Millionaires Trump Is Putting In Charge of Our Government & Economy

One of the most qualified groups in recent memory.

They are not progressives - so I would expect you all to be against them.
Makes sense.
 
Has anyone trump has appointed or nominated to a position in his upcoming admin unequivocally said trump lost the 2020 election? Cuz.........you know.........he lost.
Beyond the obvious lack of qualifications as well as disqualifying aspects of their resumes, one could argue he has assembled a group of delusional candidates who do not accept that particular reality.
What could go wrong?

More than half of the country believes that there were substantial irregularities in that election.

Mathematically it would just make sense that there would be some hires that doubted that the results were accurate.
 
Has anyone trump has appointed or nominated to a position in his upcoming admin unequivocally said trump lost the 2020 election? Cuz.........you know.........he lost.
I only know of 2 for sure (but there may be others), Robert Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard.
 
One of the most qualified groups in recent memory.

They are not progressives - so I would expect you all to be against them.
Makes sense.


This is more than just a tax cut story. It's about a fundamental shift in power and wealth from average people and the governments they had formed to represent them, to the capture of those governments and economic enslavement of their people by corporate aristocracies.

Whether the power and wealth agent that takes the place of government is a local baron, lord, king, or corporation, if it has greater power in the lives of individuals than does a representative government, the culture has dissolved into feudalism.

Bluntly, Bloch states: “The feudal system meant the rigorous economic subjection of a host of humble folk to a few powerful men.”

This doesn’t mean the end of government, but, instead the subordination of government to the interests of the feudal lords. Interestingly, even in Feudal Europe, Bloch points out, “The concept of the State never absolutely disappeared, and where it retained the most vitality men continued to call themselves ‘free’…”

The transition from a governmental society to a feudal one is marked by the rapid accumulation of power and wealth in a few hands, with a corresponding reduction in the power and responsibilities of governments that represent the people.

Once the rich and powerful gain control of the government, they turn it upon itself, usually first eliminating its taxation process as it applies to themselves. Says Bloch: “Nobles need not pay taille [taxes].”
 
No, asshole.

Trump knows that if he wants to prevent the same thing happening that happened to him last time, he has to hire people that will prevent it.

Sorry if that bothers you.
Agreed. This time he won't even have to consider if his actions are legal.
 
You guys lost.....so now you're starting to worry and create conspiracy theories.
You guys lost in 2020........then went on to spread conspiracy theories to explain away the loss.
 
Has anyone trump has appointed or nominated to a position in his upcoming admin unequivocally said trump lost the 2020 election? Cuz.........you know.........he lost.
Beyond the obvious lack of qualifications as well as disqualifying aspects of their resumes, one could argue he has assembled a group of delusional candidates who do not accept that particular reality.
What could go wrong?
.



Translation -- help me find yet another way to make President Trump continue to live in my brain at night, because I'm running out of excuses for hating the man, and if I stop hating, I will have no reason to live. I know this because it's what my TV tells me.









.
 

This is more than just a tax cut story. It's about a fundamental shift in power and wealth from average people and the governments they had formed to represent them, to the capture of those governments and economic enslavement of their people by corporate aristocracies.

Whether the power and wealth agent that takes the place of government is a local baron, lord, king, or corporation, if it has greater power in the lives of individuals than does a representative government, the culture has dissolved into feudalism.

Bluntly, Bloch states: “The feudal system meant the rigorous economic subjection of a host of humble folk to a few powerful men.”

This doesn’t mean the end of government, but, instead the subordination of government to the interests of the feudal lords. Interestingly, even in Feudal Europe, Bloch points out, “The concept of the State never absolutely disappeared, and where it retained the most vitality men continued to call themselves ‘free’…”

The transition from a governmental society to a feudal one is marked by the rapid accumulation of power and wealth in a few hands, with a corresponding reduction in the power and responsibilities of governments that represent the people.

Once the rich and powerful gain control of the government, they turn it upon itself, usually first eliminating its taxation process as it applies to themselves. Says Bloch: “Nobles need not pay taille [taxes].”

Not relevant in any way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top