Obama doesn't need, nor did he provide proof.And Trump will tell you he is targeting drug runners and like Obama provide no actual proof.
Al-Awlaki was in a do not visit country and a war zone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama doesn't need, nor did he provide proof.And Trump will tell you he is targeting drug runners and like Obama provide no actual proof.
Obama doesn't need, nor did he provide proof.
Al-Awlaki was in a do not visit country and a war zone.
Yes there is.No he wasn't and even if so, irrelevant. There are no Constitutional exemptions.
Both parties are simply horrible.
Yes there is.
The US constitution doesn't apply outside of the US.
The word citizens is not in the ConstitutionThe Constitution applies to citizens, period.
It's awful how much both cults sound exactly alike.
The word citizens is not in the Constitution
Yes, US citizens IN the US.The Constitution applies to citizens, period.
It's awful how much both cults sound exactly alike.
See.Poor Q-NUT.
Trump pardons cocaine kingpin who ruled Honduras
View attachment 1190158
USA Today
https://www.usatoday.com › news › politics › 2025/12/02
1 day ago — The judge said Hernandez used his political power to limit the risk of interdiction of cocaine and the risk of arrest of drug traffickers.
Trump said Nov. 28 that he planned to pardon former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez. A White House official and Hernandez's attorney, Renato Stabile, confirmed Dec. 2 that the pardon has been issued. Stabile said Hernandez was released early Dec. 2 from a federal prison, where he was serving a 45-year sentence "for cocaine importation and related weapons offenses," according to the Justice Department.
Hernandez was convicted in March of 2024 after a three-week jury trial in New York City. He was "at the center of one of the largest and most violent drug-trafficking conspiracies in the world," helping to bring more than 400 tons of cocaine into the U.S., the Justice Department said in a news release last year after his conviction.
Yes, US citizens IN the US.
The constitution does NOT follow a US citizen around the world.
Were you alive back then?
Lawmakers raise concerns about Obama's drone policies
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee - Republicans and Democrats alike - expressed concern on Wednesday about U.S. drone strikes against American citizens and President Barack Obama's secrecy in laying out the legal justifications.
The public congressional hearing on "drone-kill policy" was noteworthy: government officials refrained for years from even uttering the word "drone" when talking about the use of armed, pilotless aircraft because such operations were classified.
You cannot talk of both parties as horrible unless you say the same thing when your side is in power. And you do not. it will be interesting to see what Virginia and New Jersey look like in a couple of years. The Francis Scott Key bridge in Maryland rebuild is becoming a joke.No he wasn't and even if so, irrelevant. There are no Constitutional exemptions.
Both parties are simply horrible.
Once again Lesh shows us he has never seen the Constitution.The word citizens is not in the Constitution
See what Q-NUT?See.
You cannot talk of both parties as horrible unless you say the same thing when your side is in power.
You're right, it applies to most everyone on US soil.Nope.
Correct, where the US is concerned.Where the United States is concerned it most certainly does.
You're right, it applies to most everyone on US soil.
Correct, where the US is concerned.
Countries aren't changing their laws to accommodate the US constitution.
That's where politicians and the US embassy, come into play.
Yep.It applies as written to everyone on US soil.
(exclusions are noted)
We are speaking US actions.
Oh. By "nutter", you mean "truth teller"?He nutters are out I see lol
He nutters are out I see lol
Did you just lie, or are you talking out your ass again?The word citizens is not in the Constitution
