Obama Presided Over Numerous 'Double Taps' Against Targets, No Complaining, Now They Complain When Narcoterrorists May Have Been 'Double Tapped'

And Trump will tell you he is targeting drug runners and like Obama provide no actual proof.
Obama doesn't need, nor did he provide proof.

Al-Awlaki was in a do not visit country and a war zone.
 
Obama doesn't need, nor did he provide proof.

Al-Awlaki was in a do not visit country and a war zone.

No he wasn't and even if so, irrelevant. There are no Constitutional exemptions.

Both parties are simply horrible.
 
Poor Q-NUT.

Trump pardons cocaine kingpin who ruled Honduras

View attachment 1190158
USA Today
https://www.usatoday.com › news › politics › 2025/12/02
1 day ago — The judge said Hernandez used his political power to limit the risk of interdiction of cocaine and the risk of arrest of drug traffickers.

Trump said Nov. 28 that he planned to pardon former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez. A White House official and Hernandez's attorney, Renato Stabile, confirmed Dec. 2 that the pardon has been issued. Stabile said Hernandez was released early Dec. 2 from a federal prison, where he was serving a 45-year sentence "for cocaine importation and related weapons offenses," according to the Justice Department.

Hernandez was convicted in March of 2024 after a three-week jury trial in New York City. He was "at the center of one of the largest and most violent drug-trafficking conspiracies in the world," helping to bring more than 400 tons of cocaine into the U.S., the Justice Department said in a news release last year after his conviction.
See.
 
Were you alive back then?

Lawmakers raise concerns about Obama's drone policies​

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee - Republicans and Democrats alike - expressed concern on Wednesday about U.S. drone strikes against American citizens and President Barack Obama's secrecy in laying out the legal justifications.
The public congressional hearing on "drone-kill policy" was noteworthy: government officials refrained for years from even uttering the word "drone" when talking about the use of armed, pilotless aircraft because such operations were classified.


No, libs weren't concerned at all when a dem was going at it. Your words are hollow once again.
 
No he wasn't and even if so, irrelevant. There are no Constitutional exemptions.

Both parties are simply horrible.
You cannot talk of both parties as horrible unless you say the same thing when your side is in power. And you do not. it will be interesting to see what Virginia and New Jersey look like in a couple of years. The Francis Scott Key bridge in Maryland rebuild is becoming a joke.
 
The word citizens is not in the Constitution
Once again Lesh shows us he has never seen the Constitution.



AI Overview


Yes, the word "citizen" appears in the U.S. Constitution, particularly in Article I regarding the qualifications for serving in Congress and Article II for the Presidency, and is prominently defined in the 14th Amendment. The original Constitution referenced "citizens" but did not formally define citizenship, a task later addressed by the 14th Amendment, which states that all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. are citizens.

  • Original Constitution:
    The original text includes requirements for office that use the word "citizen," such as being a "citizen of the United States" for at least nine years to be a Senator, or being a "natural born citizen" to be President.

    • 14th Amendment:
      This amendment, ratified in 1868, is the primary source for the definition of citizenship in the U.S. Constitution.


        • It states that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States... are citizens of the United States".
        • It also prohibits states from abridging the "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States".
 
You cannot talk of both parties as horrible unless you say the same thing when your side is in power.

Bugger off with your inability to comprehend basic words.
 
You're right, it applies to most everyone on US soil.
Where the United States is concerned it most certainly does.
Correct, where the US is concerned.
Countries aren't changing their laws to accommodate the US constitution.
That's where politicians and the US embassy, come into play.
 
You're right, it applies to most everyone on US soil.

It applies as written to everyone on US soil.

(exclusions are noted)


Correct, where the US is concerned.
Countries aren't changing their laws to accommodate the US constitution.
That's where politicians and the US embassy, come into play.

We are speaking US actions.
 
15th post
It applies as written to everyone on US soil.

(exclusions are noted)




We are speaking US actions.
Yep.
With the evidence presented and later revealed Anwar al-Awlaki was an enemy combatant.


PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH DISCUSSES GLOBAL ...​

1764856470267.webp
9/11 Memorial
https://www.911memorial.org › files › inline-files


PDF

Sep 5, 2006 — We will not meet [the enemy] halfway. There will be no room for ... This time, we're not waiting for our enemies to gather in strength.
 
Back
Top Bottom