Obama Judge Unfires Agency Head

Some of them are covered by federal statutes that limit the president’s authority to dismiss them.

So it seems perhaps a judge telling Trump that he is not above the law.
The law violates the separation of powers and should be ignored.
 
No it hasn't.
Indeed it has. The difference has always been that Republicans never attempt to embed themselves in liberal administrations or sue to avoid allowing the president to enact his agenda. Clinton, Obama, and Biden purged the government of opposition, Republicans just didn't whine about it and sue like seditious Democrats are attempting to do.
 
Indeed it has. The difference has always been that Republicans never attempt to embed themselves in liberal administrations or sue to avoid allowing the president to enact his agenda. Clinton, Obama, and Biden purged the government of opposition, Republicans just didn't whine about it and sue like seditious Democrats are attempting to do.

Trump appointed judges have ruled against him. Just wanting something does not make it so.
 
Indeed it has. The difference has always been that Republicans never attempt to embed themselves in liberal administrations or sue to avoid allowing the president to enact his agenda. Clinton, Obama, and Biden purged the government of opposition, Republicans just didn't whine about it and sue like seditious Democrats are attempting to do.
Pure bullshit
 
Love it....

Every time a Hack in Black pulls some shit like this, it reinforces the claim of "Deep State"

Now, even the most die-hard dim can't say there isn't a Deep State. Well, except for the pathological liars. And there's plenty of them in the dimocrap scum party. As in -- Most of the dimocrap scum party.

nevermind

Serious People can't deny there's a Deep State anymore. And nobody cares what scum of the Earth dims think
 
Of those 400, the ones I like I would like the ones I don’t like I won’t like.

What I won’t do is wine and cry that a new president got elected and undid what the previous president did.
This isn't about which PO you might like or not.

But ONLY about:
that a single person (in this case a President) can't simply ignore the US Constitution and as such Courts, the Senate and Congress.

President Xi in China needs the approval of the National People's Congress and the Congress Standing Committee , for whatever law or directive he wants to implement or change.

Trump is behaving just as North-Korea's Kim Jong Un, who rules North Korea as a totalitarian dictatorship.
And everyone (even you) should be aware as to how "great" North-Korea is. Maybe people like you should shift to North-Korea, in order to keep America GREAT.
 
This isn't about which PO you might like or not.

But ONLY about:
that a single person (in this case a President) can't simply ignore the US Constitution and as such Courts, the Senate and Congress.

President Xi in China needs the approval of the National People's Congress and the Congress Standing Committee , for whatever law or directive he wants to implement or change.

Trump is behaving just as North-Korea's Kim Jong Un, who rules North Korea as a totalitarian dictatorship.
And everyone (even you) should be aware as to how "great" North-Korea is. Maybe people like you should shift to North-Korea, in order to keep America GREAT.
Wrong, the single person defying the Constitution are the activist judges ignoring the separation of powers for their own partisan reasons.
 
"Judge to Trump-terminated ethics watchdog: You’re un-fired
Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger won an order allowing him to remain in his job for now.

A federal judge reined in President Donald Trump’s firing spree Monday, ruling that a federal ethics watchdog can return to his job for at least a few days while the judge receives more detailed legal arguments about the case.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued the reprieve to Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger, after he sued to contest the Friday night email he received from the White House indicating he’d been dismissed from his position. Dellinger, an appointee of President Joe Biden, is just one of various officials across the government whom Trump has tried to fire in recent days. Some of them are covered by federal statutes that limit the president’s authority to dismiss them.

Although his title is special counsel, Dellinger’s position is different from the more prominent special counsels who prosecute politically sensitive cases for the Justice Department. Rather, Dellinger leads an independent federal agency that handles whistleblower issues and complaints about violations of the Hatch Act, which limits political activity by government employees."




Now the judicial tyrants of the Left will try to block Trump at every turn as he tries to bring down the deep state.
The Demcorats claims about respecting democracy were just lies. Trump won democratically, but they will try to thwart the will of the people.

**This article was brought to you by USAID funded Politico.
Why do you suppose the article never mentions the judge is a leftwing activist appointed by 0bama? When it's a Trump appointee, it's always mentioned.
 
Not really..

This is an independent position, there as an oversight on the administration... Biden left in people in place as well and didn't try and fire like the special investigator into his son...
We get that you want no oversight on Trump's actions... That might be a little stupid... Trump is not king..

There can be no independent positions inside the executive branch.

The President IS the executive branch.

Sooner or later the SC will put a stop to this, and I have a feeling many of the orders will be 9-0.
 
This isn't about which PO you might like or not.

But ONLY about:
that a single person (in this case a President) can't simply ignore the US Constitution and as such Courts, the Senate and Congress.
What law, or what part of the constitution says that the president cannot freeze spending?

It’s not just a random person who happens to be the president like any other federal job. The constitution vests the ENTIRE executive power in that one person. It doesn’t say that the president has to get approval from the courts in order to execute the will of Congress.

Maybe you wish it was different. Maybe you think the president should have some power but be under some kind of committee to keep that power in check. Propose an amendment to the constitution then but don’t expect us to act like that’s the way it already is.

Congress gives FEMA a budget and it’s up to the president to determine how the budget will be managed. Freezing spending pending investigation into the huge amount of fraud waste and abuse they are uncovering seems a very wise move. But even if it were an idiotic move, he is the person we voted for to have the executive power.

All of it.
President Xi in China needs the approval of the National People's Congress and the Congress Standing Committee , for whatever law or directive he wants to implement or change.

Trump is behaving just as North-Korea's Kim Jong Un, who rules North Korea as a totalitarian dictatorship.
And everyone (even you) should be aware as to how "great" North-Korea is. Maybe people like you should shift to North-Korea, in order to keep America GREAT.
Silly comparisons by people upset that the unlimited gravy train is over.

What is the limit on the power of the courts, if any? If you believe there is a limit, how is that limit enforced?

You seem to think that each judge is their own dictator, even if they are a low level federal judge, they can tell the whole country how it is to be run. Where did you get that idea?
 
Back
Top Bottom