That is a lame and misinformed excuse. Name a bill that that Reid or Obama rejected that dealt with US security and funding of operations against terrorist operations. You just refuse to admit that the grid locked House and now, the Senate can not get past the internal Republican politics to fund the campaign against ISIS.Why would there be when the Republicans know that Harry Reid would shoot it down, before Obama could do the same ?Really, there was legislation passed by the House in regards to funding a military campaign against ISIS that got grid locked? I would like to review that legislation. Did it have a number on it? Is there a link to what the legislation was about?For almost all that time there has been gridlock between a Rep House and a Dem Senate + Obama's anti-war at all costs approach.Send those photo's to the dysfunctional Republican congress that seems incapable of being anything other than inept. Five months after we began a bombing campaign and the "do nothing" Republicans have yet to offer funding of any kind or the least bit of congressional direction in the way of legislative guidance.Bill Clinton once said the biggest regret of his presidency was his inaction regarding Rwanda. After taking action to stop ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, Clinton (like other world leaders), sat back and did nothing while 800,000 Rwandans (mostly Tutsis) were slaughtered by their Hutu neighbors.
Fast foward to 2015. Now we have Obama sitting back and watching thousands of Iraqis and Syrians being slaughtered by ISIS. And all the while, Obama doesn't seem to care. He's more interested in appeasing his liberal American voter base, telling him to stay out of it.
Clinton at least expresses regret for his tragic inaction. Obama hasn't done that yet. It remains to be seen if he ever will.
The photos I could post of ISIS brutality, are ommitted only because of their exceedingly, horrifying nature.