Obama is spending $200 million PER DAY on his little jaunt to India

[barenakedislam]

Are you guatama's clone? Which illiterate militant group do you belong to?

Sorry if the truth gets your panties in a wad. Why else do you think the Muslim-in-Chief has banned the words "Islamic terrorist" from use anywhere in his administration?

I consider people like you to be homegrown terrorists, just as evil with your own agenda as Islamic jihadis.

WOOHOO! Hey PixieStix, you never told me that Janet Napolitano was a member of this forum!

 

[mudwhistle]

Sorry, but Bill Riley says you are a Liar about the $200 million. So you just lost all credibility from your own Fox News people. We can no longer believe what you say about Obama being Muslim or any connections to terrorists. But we should wonder about someone like you that openly wears an Infidel t with muslim writting on it. You must be a counter-agent and a terrorist yourself. And here I had such high hopes for you, but alas, you dashed those hopes with an outright lie.

Shouldn't this thread be moved to the comic section, as their is no conspiracy here, just a comical lie.

$200 million is a bit much. But the expense is so immense they won't tell us what it will cost. They used the old fall back "National Security is at stake". Fox News is just reporting the only information that is available. They leave it up to everyone to decide the validity.

Btw...Obama was born in a Muslim family so in the eyes of most Muslims he is one of them but since he a non-practicing Muslim he's an Apostate.


Some of Obama's friends are terrorists and terrorist supporters.

Bill Ayer's "memoir" is his justification for the violent path that he and his Weather Underground comrades chose. There is no genuine mea culpa, only a grudging admission that the violent path may have turned out to have been tactically and strategically — not morally — wrong, or ill-timed. He sees himself during his Weatherman years not as a terrorist but as an "educator," which should give pause to those who are singing his praises now as an "educational reformer." "Terrorists destroy randomly," he rationalizes, "while our actions bore ... the precise stamp of a cut diamond. Terrorists intimidate, while we aimed only to educate."

"I can't imagine entirely dismissing the possibility" of bombing again, he wrote in Fugitive Days.


Ayers would later remark, in a sympathetic New York Times interview (inauspiciously published, by the way, on September 11, 2001): "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough." He also claimed, in the same interview, that the Weathermen had "showed remarkable restraint."

Remarkable restraint? Hundreds of bombings (possibly thousands — there were over 5,000 bombings that may have been their work, but the perpetrators have not been identified), dozens killed, and millions terrorized by their tens of thousands of bombing threats. And Ayers and Dohrn refuse to answer questions about their participation in those terror attacks. Regarding those matters, Ayers defiantly states in his memoir, "Some details cannot be told."

Virtually none of the reportage in the "mainstream" news has mentioned that there is overwhelming ironclad evidence showing that Ayers and the Weather Underground received funds, training, weapons, false identification documents, passports, safe houses, and other assistance from our enemies: the communist governments of China and the Soviet Union, as well as their minions — Cuba, East Germany, North Vietnam, Czechoslovakia, and North Korea. We know this from the many admissions of Weathermen in their own writings and interviews, as well as from defectors and the numerous documents released by the FBI of intercepted communications, surveillance photos, testimony of undercover operatives, and captured records.

"OK, OK," say the liberal-left media apologists, "maybe Ayers and Dohrn got a little extreme, but that was so lonnnnnggggg ago. Isn't it time to let bye-gones be bye-gones and move on? They've changed and are now respected members of the Chicago community."

But did they change? Did they change anything other than their modus operandi? Or did they just get tired of running? Did the romance of being outlaws wear off? Did they merely decide to carry on the revolution by other means?

Any reasonable survey of Ayers' and Dohrn's actions, associations, writings, speeches, policy advocacy, and political activism since resurfacing would indicate that they have not changed their anti-American, pro-communist philosophy and political objectives one iota. Ayers, Dohrn, and their SDS-Weathermen comrades considered "Amerikkka" to be the enemy and considered the genocidal communist regimes in Moscow, Beijing, and Havana to be the leading forces of "liberation." They have not changed. Ayers still insists that the United States is a "white supremacist," "racist," "imperialist," "oppressive" country. He still calls himself a "small 'c' communist" and continues his infatuation with Fidel Castro, Che Guevarra, Ho Chi Minh, Mao Zedong, et al. To this sacred pantheon he has added Venezuela's communist satrap, Hugo Chavez.

Consider Bill Ayers' November 2006 address in Caracas, Venezuela, to dictator Chavez and the assembled comrades at the World Education Forum, which can be accessed at Ayers' own website. Here, in part, is his address:

President Hugo Chavez ... invited guests, comrades. I'm honored and humbled to be here with you this morning. I bring greetings and support from your brothers and sisters throughout Northamerica. Welcome to the World Education Forum! Amamos la revolucion Bolivariana! ["We love the Bolivarian revolution," a reference to the name Chavez has given his particular communist revolution.]

Ayers then goes on to say:

This is my fourth visit to Venezuela, each time at the invitation of my comrade and friend Luis Bonilla, a brilliant educator and inspiring fighter for justice. Luis has taught me a great deal about the Bolivarian Revolution and about the profound educational reforms underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution, and I've come to appreciate Luis as a major asset in both the Venezuelan and the international struggle.

Who is this dear comrade Bonilla? He is one of Chavez' top propagandists and president of Venezuela's new Miranda International Center, which Bonilla describes as "a physical, institutional space to coordinate international support for the Bolivarian process, thus allowing thinkers and activists from all over the world who are committed to emancipation to help the Bolivarian Republic on many levels." By which he means, of course, "small 'c' communists" like Ayers, as well as "big 'C' Communists" who are openly members of official Communist Parties. Two of the goals Bonilla has targeted are establishing a "critical pedagogy" and building "Twenty-first Century socialism."

Obama's Terrorist Ties and Radical Roots

This is just one of the connections Obama has with terrorist, Communists, and revolutionaries.

Gee, let's resurrect the lies about the Ayers/Obama connection? And after that we can discuss how Acorn made sure some of the Mamma Grizzleys lost the election. Won't that just make your day, asshole?

What a horse's ass you are. And by the way, the actual cost of and logistical preparation for ANY foreign trip by a president are NEVER revealed, stupid.

So your defense is calling me a horse's ass.

Wow....that cut me to the quick.

Btw....how bout a link.

 

[mudwhistle]

What nationality do you think this baby is???

I think he looks Pakistani or Indonesian.

 

[barenakedislam]

What nationality do you think this baby is???

I think he looks Pakistani or Indonesian.

Looks like Obama, so I guess Kenyan.

 

[mudwhistle]

Sorry, but Bill Riley says you are a Liar about the $200 million. So you just lost all credibility from your own Fox News people. We can no longer believe what you say about Obama being Muslim or any connections to terrorists. But we should wonder about someone like you that openly wears an Infidel t with muslim writting on it. You must be a counter-agent and a terrorist yourself. And here I had such high hopes for you, but alas, you dashed those hopes with an outright lie.

Shouldn't this thread be moved to the comic section, as their is no conspiracy here, just a comical lie.

$200 million is a bit much. But the expense is so immense they won't tell us what it will cost. They used the old fall back "National Security is at stake". Fox News is just reporting the only information that is available. They leave it up to everyone to decide the validity.

Btw...Obama was born in a Muslim family so in the eyes of most Muslims he is one of them but since he a non-practicing Muslim he's an Apostate.


Some of Obama's friends are terrorists and terrorist supporters.

Bill Ayer's "memoir" is his justification for the violent path that he and his Weather Underground comrades chose. There is no genuine mea culpa, only a grudging admission that the violent path may have turned out to have been tactically and strategically — not morally — wrong, or ill-timed. He sees himself during his Weatherman years not as a terrorist but as an "educator," which should give pause to those who are singing his praises now as an "educational reformer." "Terrorists destroy randomly," he rationalizes, "while our actions bore ... the precise stamp of a cut diamond. Terrorists intimidate, while we aimed only to educate."

"I can't imagine entirely dismissing the possibility" of bombing again, he wrote in Fugitive Days.


Ayers would later remark, in a sympathetic New York Times interview (inauspiciously published, by the way, on September 11, 2001): "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough." He also claimed, in the same interview, that the Weathermen had "showed remarkable restraint."

Remarkable restraint? Hundreds of bombings (possibly thousands — there were over 5,000 bombings that may have been their work, but the perpetrators have not been identified), dozens killed, and millions terrorized by their tens of thousands of bombing threats. And Ayers and Dohrn refuse to answer questions about their participation in those terror attacks. Regarding those matters, Ayers defiantly states in his memoir, "Some details cannot be told."

Virtually none of the reportage in the "mainstream" news has mentioned that there is overwhelming ironclad evidence showing that Ayers and the Weather Underground received funds, training, weapons, false identification documents, passports, safe houses, and other assistance from our enemies: the communist governments of China and the Soviet Union, as well as their minions — Cuba, East Germany, North Vietnam, Czechoslovakia, and North Korea. We know this from the many admissions of Weathermen in their own writings and interviews, as well as from defectors and the numerous documents released by the FBI of intercepted communications, surveillance photos, testimony of undercover operatives, and captured records.

"OK, OK," say the liberal-left media apologists, "maybe Ayers and Dohrn got a little extreme, but that was so lonnnnnggggg ago. Isn't it time to let bye-gones be bye-gones and move on? They've changed and are now respected members of the Chicago community."

But did they change? Did they change anything other than their modus operandi? Or did they just get tired of running? Did the romance of being outlaws wear off? Did they merely decide to carry on the revolution by other means?

Any reasonable survey of Ayers' and Dohrn's actions, associations, writings, speeches, policy advocacy, and political activism since resurfacing would indicate that they have not changed their anti-American, pro-communist philosophy and political objectives one iota. Ayers, Dohrn, and their SDS-Weathermen comrades considered "Amerikkka" to be the enemy and considered the genocidal communist regimes in Moscow, Beijing, and Havana to be the leading forces of "liberation." They have not changed. Ayers still insists that the United States is a "white supremacist," "racist," "imperialist," "oppressive" country. He still calls himself a "small 'c' communist" and continues his infatuation with Fidel Castro, Che Guevarra, Ho Chi Minh, Mao Zedong, et al. To this sacred pantheon he has added Venezuela's communist satrap, Hugo Chavez.

Consider Bill Ayers' November 2006 address in Caracas, Venezuela, to dictator Chavez and the assembled comrades at the World Education Forum, which can be accessed at Ayers' own website. Here, in part, is his address:

President Hugo Chavez ... invited guests, comrades. I'm honored and humbled to be here with you this morning. I bring greetings and support from your brothers and sisters throughout Northamerica. Welcome to the World Education Forum! Amamos la revolucion Bolivariana! ["We love the Bolivarian revolution," a reference to the name Chavez has given his particular communist revolution.]

Ayers then goes on to say:

This is my fourth visit to Venezuela, each time at the invitation of my comrade and friend Luis Bonilla, a brilliant educator and inspiring fighter for justice. Luis has taught me a great deal about the Bolivarian Revolution and about the profound educational reforms underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution, and I've come to appreciate Luis as a major asset in both the Venezuelan and the international struggle.

Who is this dear comrade Bonilla? He is one of Chavez' top propagandists and president of Venezuela's new Miranda International Center, which Bonilla describes as "a physical, institutional space to coordinate international support for the Bolivarian process, thus allowing thinkers and activists from all over the world who are committed to emancipation to help the Bolivarian Republic on many levels." By which he means, of course, "small 'c' communists" like Ayers, as well as "big 'C' Communists" who are openly members of official Communist Parties. Two of the goals Bonilla has targeted are establishing a "critical pedagogy" and building "Twenty-first Century socialism."

Obama's Terrorist Ties and Radical Roots

This is just one of the connections Obama has with terrorist, Communists, and revolutionaries.

Gee, let's resurrect the lies about the Ayers/Obama connection? And after that we can discuss how Acorn made sure some of the Mamma Grizzleys lost the election. Won't that just make your day, asshole?

What a horse's ass you are. And by the way, the actual cost of and logistical preparation for ANY foreign trip by a president are NEVER revealed, stupid.

The Obama Administration claims the names such as Micheal Moore, William Ayers, and other that appeared on the official visitor logs were just people who possessed similar names.

LIES!!!!

 

[mudwhistle]

What nationality do you think this baby is???

I think he looks Pakistani or Indonesian.

Looks like Obama, so I guess Kenyan.

If I had posted this elsewhere you wouldn't have thought so.

 

[barenakedislam]

What nationality do you think this baby is???

I think he looks Pakistani or Indonesian.

Looks like Obama, so I guess Kenyan.

If I had posted this elsewhere you wouldn't have thought so.

Maybe, but something about his mouth looks just like Obama. The eyes sort of too.

 

[rdean]

Obama is spending $200 million PER DAY on his little jaunt to India

You don't think that Republicans wanting to believe ANYTHING about this president, no matter how far out and how weird has NOTHING to do with racism? Seriously?

No one really believes that? They can't. It's not possible.

Odumbo is Muslim sewage. I wonder if he will meet with his terrorist brothers in Indonesia?

Are you guatama's clone? Which illiterate militant group do you belong to?

I would guess the "Confederate Republican Party of Teabags".

After all those threats about seceding, they didn't. I was so bummed. We could have raised the country's IQ by 40 points and lowered the debt in one fell swoop.

 

[barenakedislam]

Odumbo is Muslim sewage. I wonder if he will meet with his terrorist brothers in Indonesia?

Are you guatama's clone? Which illiterate militant group do you belong to?

I would guess the "Confederate Republican Party of Teabags".

After all those threats about seceding, they didn't. I was so bummed. We could have raised the country's IQ by 40 points and lowered the debt in one fell swoop.

The blue states are the ones with the highest unemployment. IQ is over-rated assuming Odumbo has a high one. The country's in the worst shape its ever been in since the '30's.

 

[rdean]

Are you guatama's clone? Which illiterate militant group do you belong to?

I would guess the "Confederate Republican Party of Teabags".

After all those threats about seceding, they didn't. I was so bummed. We could have raised the country's IQ by 40 points and lowered the debt in one fell swoop.

The blue states are the ones with the highest unemployment. IQ is over-rated assuming Odumbo has a high one. The country's in the worst shape its ever been in since the '30's.

That sounds good, but as I pointed out with a previous post, blue states receive less than a dollar for every dollar they pay in federal taxes. Red states receive MORE than one dollar for every dollar they pay in federal taxes. Blue states are subsidizing red states.

Besides, it's in blue states where all the technology and manufacturing and innovation is. You can't build nuclear powered subs with people who grow corn. You just can't. It takes education.

 

[HUGGY]

I would guess the "Confederate Republican Party of Teabags".

After all those threats about seceding, they didn't. I was so bummed. We could have raised the country's IQ by 40 points and lowered the debt in one fell swoop.

The blue states are the ones with the highest unemployment. IQ is over-rated assuming Odumbo has a high one. The country's in the worst shape its ever been in since the '30's.

That sounds good, but as I pointed out with a previous post, blue states receive less than a dollar for every dollar they pay in federal taxes. Red states receive MORE than one dollar for every dollar they pay in federal taxes. Blue states are subsidizing red states.

Besides, it's in blue states where all the technology and manufacturing and innovation is. You can't build nuclear powered subs with people who grow corn. You just can't. It takes education.

No it doesn't. Homer Simpson doesn't have an education. Fox wouldn't show it if it wasn't true.

 

[Vanquish]

Again on the radio, Beck tried to defend his absurdly mistaken mis-estimation of the president's trip spending via the Indian news source. In the quote he played he disproved the assertion he was trying to make.

Bahahahahahahahahha

 

[Dante]

How's that FOX News fact doin'?

Obama India trip costing American tax payers over $200 million dollars a day.

 

[Vanquish]

Huh?

 

[Synthaholic]

On the latest Bill Maher, Bill O'Reilly admitted that this is just a bunch of bullshit. When Maher said that FOX was reporting it, he asked "Who?", and Maher said Hannity, for one. O'Reilly said "Take it up with Hannity, then".

You know it's bad when O'Reilly is embarrassed by his idiot co-workers.

 

[Dante]

Again on the radio, Beck tried to defend his absurdly mistaken mis-estimation of the president's trip spending via the Indian news source. In the quote he played he disproved the assertion he was trying to make.

Bahahahahahahahahha

A few decades back, Beck would have been institutionalized. But move forward and he gets his won television talk show. How cool is that?

De-institutionalization works. The idiots are running the asylum.
\

 

[deanrd]

What the OP wrote: Aren't you happy there's so much extra cash in the Treasury that Obama can afford to take 3,000 of his closest friends and relatives to India on your dime?

And it was all lies.

And USMB Republicans totally believed it.

Now, about that wall:

I find Republicans on the USMB are no different than Republicans everywhere.

They not only believe nonsense, they defend it.

 

[depotoo]

Yep, maybe 200 million Indian currency, the rupee. That would c9me to 2.85 million US per day.

Aren't you happy there's so much extra cash in the Treasury that Obama can afford to take 3,000 of his closest friends and relatives to India on your dime?

Didint you read the story? Closest friends? As far as i can tell, he isnt taking one person that isnt a government employee or journalist. Thats still an absurd amount of money to be spending per day though. Something tells me this is an exagerated figure.

By the way, im a republican, so dont even go there... and for the record dumb ****, if you need to make up lies or stretch the truth in order to make the dems look bad, then you got no business even talking politics at all. Theres plenty of real things theyre doing that we can complain about.

 

[Kat]

What the OP wrote: Aren't you happy there's so much extra cash in the Treasury that Obama can afford to take 3,000 of his closest friends and relatives to India on your dime?

And it was all lies.

And USMB Republicans totally believed it.

Now, about that wall:

I find Republicans on the USMB are no different than Republicans everywhere.

They not only believe nonsense, they defend it.

You dragged up a thread from Nov 3, 2010??? Why?