Obama hires DEAF receptionist. Then hires INTERPRETER for her!!! Typical liberal waste!!!

[Stephanie]

Only in America.......

What's next........blind Secret Service agents?

White House Marine security guards in wheelchairs?

More than likely with the idiots we have in our government. good frikken gawd. they just waste and spend, waste and spend.

 

[J.E.D]

If only that deaf female weren't given a job, then America would be on the road to recovery. Never mind all of the money that rich people and corporations avoid paying; those damn disabled people are bleeding this country dry.

Mr. Obama, fire that deaf leech so that little Timmy Whitebread can have the Christmas he deserves.

 

[Pogo]

Only in America.......

What's next........blind Secret Service agents?

White House Marine security guards in wheelchairs?

More than likely with the idiots we have in our government. good frikken gawd. they just waste and spend, waste and spend.

Damn right. Why can't the crip just stay home and let the gummint pay for food stamps.

"You've called for new sources of workers. Well, many of our fellow citizens with disabilities are unemployed. They want to work, and they can work, and this is a tremendous pool of people. And remember, this is a tremendous pool of people who will bring to jobs diversity, loyalty, proven low turnover rate, and only one request: the chance to prove themselves. And when you add together Federal, State, local, and private funds, it costs almost $200 billion annually to support Americans with disabilities -- in effect, to keep them dependent. Well, when given the opportunity to be independent, they will move proudly into the economic mainstream of American life, and that's what this legislation is all about.

Our problems are large, but our unified heart is larger. Our challenges are great, but our will is greater. And in our America, the most generous, optimistic nation on the face of the Earth, we must not and will not rest until every man and woman with a dream has the means to achieve it. << ---- President of the United States, 26 July 1990

​

--- So Steph, ShitSpitters and fellow travelers.....

What the fuck happened to that "keeping 'em dependent" rhetoric you try to use to make racism pixie dust?
Not so convenient now, is it?

AWK ward...​

 

[ShootSpeeders]

This is just stupid beyond words. Hiring a deaf-mute to be a receptionist of all things!!

You're saying the deaf can't receive? Howzat work?
.

If she can do the job then why hire the interpreter.? THINK

Because she's deaf. She needs to be able to communicate with non-deaf people in order to do her job. Since most people don't know sign language, an interpreter is necessary.

You. Are. An. Idiot.

If she can't do the job by herself like a normal person, then she shouldn't have the job. This is more affirmative action for the disabled. They don't want equal rights; they want special treatment. THINK

 

[ShootSpeeders]

So, hatred for blacks, Latino, women, and gays isn't enough. Now you're whining about the disabled getting the opportunity to work. You guys sure do have a way of winning over voters.

Let the disabled work. At jobs they can do without special treatment. THINK

 

[J.E.D]

Stfu, moron

 

[Freewill]

I got a really good idea for this political appointee. Instead of having the deaf woman answer the phone somehow or have the interpreter there to translate just have the woman translator as the receptionist and the deaf person as the translator to any deaf person who might come in the office.

 

[FJO]

Stfu, moron

In the spirit of political correctness, equality, fairness and helping the disadvantaged, President Obama's next personal driver will be a blind black lesbian, aided by a white male, and his new press secretary will be a mute person of undetermined gender and ancestry, aided by teleprompter and hot microphones.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Stfu, moron

The board notes that all you libs have is namecalling. Thanks for admitting you're wrong.

 

[J.E.D]

Stfu, moron

The board notes that all you libs have is namecalling. Thanks for admitting you're wrong.

The board notes that you're a fucking idiot

 

[hazlnut]

So the taxpayers pay two people to do the work of one!!!

New White House receptionist is a West Wing pioneer Deaf people can do anything - News - TODAY.com

march 27 2015
Anyone wanting to speak to the president must stop by her desk first. Leah Katz-Hernandez, 27, is the new White House receptionist.

She is also deaf.

“It’s a fantastic opportunity and also to show that deaf people can do anything,” she said through an interpreter, who is provided for her at work.

Man, the sickos that find themselves to this board never ceases to amaze.

What kind of pile of shit human being would not think hiring a deaf person is a good thing?

 

[Mac1958]

.

Evidently the thought of the government hiring two people to do one job does not even enter into the thought process of some.

It is in no way even a part of the issue. It doesn't even exist to them.

How can that be? Because partisan ideology distorts perception.

.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

What kind of pile of shit human being would not think hiring a deaf person is a good thing?

What kind of idiot thinks hiring incompetent people is a good thing?

 

[Pogo]

What kind of pile of shit human being would not think hiring a deaf person is a good thing?

What kind of idiot thinks hiring incompetent people is a good thing?

Your job search should be conducted outside this forum. Thanks.

 

[Pogo]

.

Evidently the thought of the government hiring two people to do one job does not even enter into the thought process of some.

It is in no way even a part of the issue. It doesn't even exist to them.

How can that be? Because partisan ideology distorts perception.

Can you uh, show us where anybody says an interpreter was "hired" for this purpose?

I see stories noting variously "an interpreter is provided" or she "has access to an interpreter". Where are you getting the idea that such person was hired separately for this sole purpose?

-- from the OP's rant?

You're taking the word of ShitSpitters as a news source? Seriously?

 

[jknowgood]

I think Obama is just making it right to the disabled after making fun of them. Remember when he saud he looked like he should've been in the special Olympics, when he bowled. Heartless bastard.

 

[Pogo]

I think Obama is just making it right to the disabled after making fun of them. Remember when he saud he looked like he should've been in the special Olympics, when he bowled. Heartless bastard.

So.... you think his athletic movements are graceful, do ya?

Ever see him throw out the first pitch at a baseball game? It's literally painful.


Summa y'all are a freaking psychiatrist's wet dream --

....First you rail on and on about "King Obama" who "thinks he's God" --- then when he makes a self-deprecating remark it becomes a slur from a "heartless bastard".
(you can't be egomaniacal and self-deprecating at the same time -- pick one)

.... First y'all rail on and on about "oh boo hoo this is the most divisive POTUS in history" and the when the WH goes all inclusive by hiring the deaf it's a "waste of taxpayer's money hiring the incompetent".
(you can't be divisive and inclusive at the same time -- pick one)


Having it both ways: Priceless.



Partisan hacks..... SMFH

 

[Harry Dresden]

Stfu, moron

The board notes that all you libs have is namecalling. Thanks for admitting you're wrong.

says the dipshit who was the first person in the thread to name call....just like everyone of your stupid threads.....THINK!....

 

[LoneLaugher]

Obama doesn't care how he spends taxpayers monies. He thinks it's own little piggy bank and snorts it up daily. their travel expenses is going to break a record.

expenses are

 

[Mac1958]

.

Evidently the thought of the government hiring two people to do one job does not even enter into the thought process of some.

It is in no way even a part of the issue. It doesn't even exist to them.

How can that be? Because partisan ideology distorts perception.

Can you uh, show us where anybody says an interpreter was "hired" for this purpose?

I see stories noting variously "an interpreter is provided" or she "has access to an interpreter". Where are you getting the idea that such person was hired separately for this sole purpose?

-- from the OP's rant?

You're taking the word of ShitSpitters as a news source? Seriously?

Yes.

I clicked on the link and watched the story. Her interpreter answers the phone for her in addition to interpreting.

So my point stands. Did you watch the story?

.