Obama has an epiphany. Finally admits we are at war.

[Jay Canuck]

so u want the President to declare war on the underwear bomber?

We are already in a war with Al Qaida. The underwar bomber acted as an agent of Al Qaida.

he did....did you see the orders he recieved from Al Qaida or is he just a ******* nut who is going to get his just sentence like sooo many other nuts have from the US courts?

 

[Liability]

so u want the President to declare war on the underwear bomber?

We are already in a war with Al Qaida. The underwar bomber acted as an agent of Al Qaida.

he did....did you see the orders he recieved from Al Qaida or is he just a ******* nut who is going to get his just sentence like sooo many other nuts have from the US courts?

Of course. Good point. Unless Jay, the Schmucky Canucky from Cunuckystain, personally SEES the "orders" of a non-uniformed unlawful enemy combatant, then the unlawful enemy combatant cannot have been an agent of that enemy! That makes perfectly good sense!

 

[Liability]

well I guess Lie-Ability and Mike can write a letter to Bush and tell him there is a connection!

No Proof Connects Iraq to 9/11, Bush Says
No Proof Connects Iraq to 9/11, Bush Says - Los Angeles Times

Jay, the infinitely douchey asshat from Canuckystain, still cannot get it though his idiot pinhead that nobody is claiming that there was ever a connection between Saddam and the 9/11/2001 attacks.

 

[CMike]

well I guess Lie-Ability and Mike can write a letter to Bush and tell him there is a connection!

No Proof Connects Iraq to 9/11, Bush Says
No Proof Connects Iraq to 9/11, Bush Says - Los Angeles Times

Yeah, so?

 

[PatekPhilippe]

well I guess Lie-Ability and Mike can write a letter to Bush and tell him there is a connection!

No Proof Connects Iraq to 9/11, Bush Says
No Proof Connects Iraq to 9/11, Bush Says - Los Angeles Times

Yeah, so?

Did you ever notice how these ******* 'tards try to blur the line between a Pentagon report that clearly states there were contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda that never developed into an operational relationship and saying because this was claimed by Bush Administration officials it meant Iraq was responsible for the WTC attack on 9/11?

I just can't understand the depth of the ******* stupidity of the left wingers. They, along with Obama, think Americans are stupid and they think if they repeat a lie long enough Americans will believe it. All you have to do is look at the way Kerry ran his campaign. He continually said for nearly 2 years that Bush claimed Iraq was responsible for 9/11 which was an OUT AND OUT LIE but the 26%'ers (leftards) and the independents fell for it.

For Christ's sake America....wake up and put these fools out of the Democratic Party once and for all. They have destroyed American ideals and have ruined our political system.

 

[mudwhistle]

What a moron.

Here you are claiming sudan offered bin laden to the US. That's not true. They offered him to Saudi Arabia.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1899787-post600.html


This is you claiming bin laden had already been charged for the 93' wtc bombing by the time Sudan offered him to SA in 1996. Unfortunately, the first time the US indicted bin laden for anything wasn't until 1998.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1899808-post604.html


Those are great examples of you making false claims that you ignore when proven wrong.

Let me get this straight.

Sudan offers Bill Clinton OBL to take into custody. OBL is the most notorious terrorist in the world who already bombed the WTC once. He is a co conspirator.

And you think Bill Clinton was justified to not accept Sudan's offer because he wasn't indicted yet?

You have to see this from a Liberal mind-set.

It doesn't matter if it's right or wrong....it's what will score political points at the moment that really matters. The was what Clinton was good at. He knew what would make him look good. He had great political sense....something that Obama is seriously lacking. He was mainly worried about what would get votes, fill the coffers, and get him laid. Everything else was secondary.

 

[Liability]

What a moron.

Here you are claiming sudan offered bin laden to the US. That's not true. They offered him to Saudi Arabia.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1899787-post600.html


This is you claiming bin laden had already been charged for the 93' wtc bombing by the time Sudan offered him to SA in 1996. Unfortunately, the first time the US indicted bin laden for anything wasn't until 1998.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1899808-post604.html


Those are great examples of you making false claims that you ignore when proven wrong.

Let me get this straight.

Sudan offers Bill Clinton OBL to take into custody. OBL is the most notorious terrorist in the world who already bombed the WTC once. He is a co conspirator.

And you think Bill Clinton was justified to not accept Sudan's offer because he wasn't indicted yet?

It begins to look like bent tight is saying that "just because that contention came outta da mouth of President Clinton himself doesn't mean it's true."

And ya gotta admit, there is a twisted kind of logic in there. It's not as though the impeached and disgraced former President is known for any concern about being honest.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Here you are claiming sudan offered bin laden to the US. That's not true. They offered him to Saudi Arabia.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1899787-post600.html


This is you claiming bin laden had already been charged for the 93' wtc bombing by the time Sudan offered him to SA in 1996. Unfortunately, the first time the US indicted bin laden for anything wasn't until 1998.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1899808-post604.html


Those are great examples of you making false claims that you ignore when proven wrong.

Let me get this straight.

Sudan offers Bill Clinton OBL to take into custody. OBL is the most notorious terrorist in the world who already bombed the WTC once. He is a co conspirator.

And you think Bill Clinton was justified to not accept Sudan's offer because he wasn't indicted yet?

It begins to look like bent tight is saying that "just because that contention came outta da mouth of President Clinton himself doesn't mean it's true."

And ya gotta admit, there is a twisted kind of logic in there. It's not as though the impeached and disgraced former President is known for any concern about being honest.

I see he's decided to cut his losses. Probably a wise move considering he's been proven wrong beyond any doubt. I just hope his eyes have been opened to the fact that he's been duped by the Democrat Party and their pack of lies. I'm not saying by any stretch that the Republicans are any better or worse..but one has to keep an open mind when lisetning to the BULLSHIT spewed by the party apparatchicks.

 

[CMike]

so u want the President to declare war on the underwear bomber?

We are already in a war with Al Qaida. The underwar bomber acted as an agent of Al Qaida.

he did....did you see the orders he recieved from Al Qaida or is he just a ******* nut who is going to get his just sentence like sooo many other nuts have from the US courts?

 

[CMike]

well I guess Lie-Ability and Mike can write a letter to Bush and tell him there is a connection!

No Proof Connects Iraq to 9/11, Bush Says
No Proof Connects Iraq to 9/11, Bush Says - Los Angeles Times

Sept. 17, 2003

Pres. Bush "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th."

 

[CMike]

Let me get this straight.

Sudan offers Bill Clinton OBL to take into custody. OBL is the most notorious terrorist in the world who already bombed the WTC once. He is a co conspirator.

And you think Bill Clinton was justified to not accept Sudan's offer because he wasn't indicted yet?

It begins to look like bent tight is saying that "just because that contention came outta da mouth of President Clinton himself doesn't mean it's true."

And ya gotta admit, there is a twisted kind of logic in there. It's not as though the impeached and disgraced former President is known for any concern about being honest.

I see he's decided to cut his losses. Probably a wise move considering he's been proven wrong beyond any doubt. I just hope his eyes have been opened to the fact that he's been duped by the Democrat Party and their pack of lies. I'm not saying by any stretch that the Republicans are any better or worse..but one has to keep an open mind when lisetning to the BULLSHIT spewed by the party apparatchicks.

He will be back, saying how we are all lying, and how he never changed his position.

He isn't that bright.

 

[Foxfyre]

Let me get this straight.

Sudan offers Bill Clinton OBL to take into custody. OBL is the most notorious terrorist in the world who already bombed the WTC once. He is a co conspirator.

And you think Bill Clinton was justified to not accept Sudan's offer because he wasn't indicted yet?

It begins to look like bent tight is saying that "just because that contention came outta da mouth of President Clinton himself doesn't mean it's true."

And ya gotta admit, there is a twisted kind of logic in there. It's not as though the impeached and disgraced former President is known for any concern about being honest.

I see he's decided to cut his losses. Probably a wise move considering he's been proven wrong beyond any doubt. I just hope his eyes have been opened to the fact that he's been duped by the Democrat Party and their pack of lies. I'm not saying by any stretch that the Republicans are any better or worse..but one has to keep an open mind when lisetning to the BULLSHIT spewed by the party apparatchicks.

I have been hugely disappointed in and angry with the Republicans for their fiscal irresponsibility, for their willingness to spend money we didn't have for things we didn't need, for their earmarks, for their abandonment of conservative principles in favor of new entitlements, and for their gutlessness when they didn't do what needed to be done to bring Iraq and Afghanistan to a close. In those regards they were little better than liberal Democrats and some sold their souls.

But I have to otherwise defend the Republicans when it comes to the war on terror. They were better. While they agreed to pull some bad provisions from the Patriot Act, they fought to keep the necessary parts in. They haven't put political correctness ahead of the public safety.

And now they aren't trying to dismantle capitalism, force a Marxist socialism on the people, force a healthcare system on the people that the vast majority do not want, have not gone back on numerous promises of transparency and full disclosure or pushing an unconscionable cap and trade policy on us that will put us under the thumb of other nations who do not have our best interests at heart. If the President and Democrats are successful in accomplishing that agenda, terrorism will be a far less worry and whether America will survive as we know it will be a far bigger one.

 

[AmericasBrave58]

11 months and 3 terrorist attacks into his Presidency he now realizes we are at war.

“We are at war,” Mr. Obama said in remarks from the White House State Dining Room.

There now Mr. President...that wasn't so painful now was it?

Oh...so that's what's been happening the last 11 months. Really!!!?

and finally the one thing Obama needed to say back in January when he assumed the Office of the Presidency and the RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE WAR ON TERRORISM.

“The buck stops with me.”

Yes it does. I guarantee you if there's another terrorist attack your Administration is definately out the door in 2012.

He's just answering some of the questions that have surfaced.

Why won't he admit we are at war?

Why does he constantly point fingers instead of taking blame himself?

Why does he and everyone that works for him give this impression that the defense of the nation is an inconvenience?


He gave a speech....nothing more. It was like he spent time thinking aloud. It was a meaningless half-hearted exposition on the obvious. Like a person who couldn't admit what the problem was and finally having to do so. Yet why do I still feel nothing has changed. He even had the gall to call for his critics to move on. Nothing to see here.

What a putz!!!

When Bush left office, he left his dirty laundry on the White House steps, and it stinks.Obama can't figure out how to wash it, and make things right!!! The stains are too deep.

 

[CMike]

11 months and 3 terrorist attacks into his Presidency he now realizes we are at war.

There now Mr. President...that wasn't so painful now was it?

Oh...so that's what's been happening the last 11 months. Really!!!?

and finally the one thing Obama needed to say back in January when he assumed the Office of the Presidency and the RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE WAR ON TERRORISM.


Yes it does. I guarantee you if there's another terrorist attack your Administration is definately out the door in 2012.

He's just answering some of the questions that have surfaced.

Why won't he admit we are at war?

Why does he constantly point fingers instead of taking blame himself?

Why does he and everyone that works for him give this impression that the defense of the nation is an inconvenience?


He gave a speech....nothing more. It was like he spent time thinking aloud. It was a meaningless half-hearted exposition on the obvious. Like a person who couldn't admit what the problem was and finally having to do so. Yet why do I still feel nothing has changed. He even had the gall to call for his critics to move on. Nothing to see here.

What a putz!!!

When Bush left office, he left his dirty laundry on the White House steps, and it stinks.Obama can't figure out how to wash it, and make things right!!! The stains are too deep.

What Pres. Bush left were safeguards to protect this country from terrorist attacks.

Obama fucked it up.

Obama IS the dirty laundry.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

11 months and 3 terrorist attacks into his Presidency he now realizes we are at war.

There now Mr. President...that wasn't so painful now was it?

Oh...so that's what's been happening the last 11 months. Really!!!?

and finally the one thing Obama needed to say back in January when he assumed the Office of the Presidency and the RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE WAR ON TERRORISM.


Yes it does. I guarantee you if there's another terrorist attack your Administration is definately out the door in 2012.

He's just answering some of the questions that have surfaced.

Why won't he admit we are at war?

Why does he constantly point fingers instead of taking blame himself?

Why does he and everyone that works for him give this impression that the defense of the nation is an inconvenience?


He gave a speech....nothing more. It was like he spent time thinking aloud. It was a meaningless half-hearted exposition on the obvious. Like a person who couldn't admit what the problem was and finally having to do so. Yet why do I still feel nothing has changed. He even had the gall to call for his critics to move on. Nothing to see here.

What a putz!!!

When Bush left office, he left his dirty laundry on the White House steps, and it stinks.Obama can't figure out how to wash it, and make things right!!! The stains are too deep.

You got this right...."Obama can't figure it out."

 

[Queen]

Oh now it's god forbid.. Your side used the terror attack 911 as a political football. This kind of commentary is as contemptible as it was back then. You don't know how voters are reacting to anything, you just know how Neocon Repubs are reacting.

Maybe you'll be surprised once again in November.

Political football? Kerry was a ******* dope.

Explain.

Do the words mission accomplished ring a bell? The Bush administration squeezed every drop of terrorist fear mongering they could throughout the 2004, 2006 and 2008 elections. As your post indicates, they intend to continue along this line.

Kerry is about as smart senator as you can get. He pummeled Bush in the debates and came very close to taking the presidency.

Let's not forget evil Cheney "if a Democrat is elected we will get hit again".

 

[CMike]

Political football? Kerry was a ******* dope.

Explain.

Do the words mission accomplished ring a bell? The Bush administration squeezed every drop of terrorist fear mongering they could throughout the 2004, 2006 and 2008 elections. As your post indicates, they intend to continue along this line.

Kerry is about as smart senator as you can get. He pummeled Bush in the debates and came very close to taking the presidency.

Let's not forget evil Cheney "if a Democrat is elected we will get hitagain".

A democrat was elected and we got hit 3 times in one year.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Do the words mission accomplished ring a bell? The Bush administration squeezed every drop of terrorist fear mongering they could throughout the 2004, 2006 and 2008 elections. As your post indicates, they intend to continue along this line.

Kerry is about as smart senator as you can get. He pummeled Bush in the debates and came very close to taking the presidency.

Let's not forget evil Cheney "if a Democrat is elected we will get hitagain".

A democrat was elected and we got hit 3 times in one year.

Oooooooooops!!!!!...looks like Queenie forgot about that!!

 

[sboyle24]

To think that the successful attacks is a result of the party in power is ridiculous. It's just as sane as the republicans paying the terrorists to attack to gain power.

 

[CMike]

To think that the successful attacks is a result of the party in power is ridiculous. It's just as sane as the republicans paying the terrorists to attack to gain power.

The president controls the resources that can be used to make it much harder to successfully carry out a terrorist attack in the US.