Obama Had A Lower Average Approval Rating Than NIXON

[IcebergSlim]

His outgoing Gallup JARs were 59%.....

How does that compare to everyone?

Did CNS/TuckerCarlson not labor that?

We're not discussing your alt-facts however....,

There is no such thing as "alt-facts"......

Why would Tucker rebleat the CNS version of the Gallup release?

Why not refer directly to Gallup?

Despite subpar approval ratings for much of his presidency, Obama finished strong. His final job approval rating, based on Jan. 17-19 Gallup Daily tracking, was 59%. Only Clinton (66%) and Reagan (63%) had higher scores in Gallup's last measurement of their approval ratings, while Eisenhower (59%) and Kennedy (58%) had similar final ratings.

Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President


Oh.......THAT'S why!

See post #6 for alt-facts....

This is the source

Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President

See the Gallup thing?

It's the same Gallup....

Which of its facts are "alt"?

O........there is much Stupid round here, yet you stand out among your fellow sheeple......there's quite a bit of Bripat about you, lad.....

Post #6 is alt-fact.....

Define "alt-fact" as you understand it, O...

Post the "alt-fact"....

Happy Trails, O!

 

[Rustic]

Obama left office with a 60% approval rating, how does that compare to Bush?

Barry is ranked 9th out of 12 and below Bush for average approval rating. That's how he ranks.

That's average....

How did people rate their ENTIRE body of work upon departure?


Scrub didn't fare quite as well.....the difference is no longer within MOE........it's nearly 100%[/QUOTE]
The biggest reason why his ratings were shit, is he spent too much and he spent on stupid things like ill thought out foreign aid....

 

[Rustic]

Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid

Really?!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.

Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!

Yes, bush spent like a drunken sailor in fact a fleet of them, only to be outdone by barry...

 

[IcebergSlim]

Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid

Really?!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.

Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!

Seriously.......you're a ******* idiot...

Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?

In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.

Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."

Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star

 

[easyt65]

Nixon was the OP's hero, I'll wager.

So, how much would you have lost if you had bet...because you would have lost on that bet.

 

[Rustic]

Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid

Really?!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.

Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!

Seriously.......you're a ******* idiot...

Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?

In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.

Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."

Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star

All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.
It's a socialist thing

 

[IcebergSlim]

Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid

Really?!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.

Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.


Show me your math, Eaze......be sure to cinch that duct tape snood real tight.......cause I'm gonna take Reality upside your empty head and "get the Led out", so to speak....

 

[IcebergSlim]

Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid

Really?!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.

Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!

Seriously.......you're a ******* idiot...

Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?

In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.

Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."

Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star

All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.
It's a socialist thing

Did you come up with that number, Dumbass?

 

[IcebergSlim]

His outgoing Gallup JARs were 59%.....

How does that compare to everyone?

Did CNS/TuckerCarlson not labor that?

We're not discussing your alt-facts however....,

There is no such thing as "alt-facts"......

Why would Tucker rebleat the CNS version of the Gallup release?

Why not refer directly to Gallup?

Despite subpar approval ratings for much of his presidency, Obama finished strong. His final job approval rating, based on Jan. 17-19 Gallup Daily tracking, was 59%. Only Clinton (66%) and Reagan (63%) had higher scores in Gallup's last measurement of their approval ratings, while Eisenhower (59%) and Kennedy (58%) had similar final ratings.

Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President


Oh.......THAT'S why!

See post #6 for alt-facts....

This is the source

Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President

See the Gallup thing?

It's the same Gallup....

Which of its facts are "alt"?

O........there is much Stupid round here, yet you stand out among your fellow sheeple......there's quite a bit of Bripat about you, lad.....

Post #6 is alt-fact.....

Uh....no......but you, sure as shit, are a moron....

Tell me, O......how did you get here?

 

[easyt65]

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Show me your math, Eaze......be sure to cinch that duct tape snood real tight.......cause I'm gonna take Reality upside your empty head and "get the Led out", so to speak....

I did show it to you. What - you want me to draw a picture for you?

BTW, it's 'get the LEAD out', so to speak.

get the lead out
phrase of lead

1. 1.
   North Americaninformal
   move or work more quickly.
   synonyms: hurry up, get a move on, be quick;

 

[NoNukes]

For all the snowflakes and Bush-haters who don't want to read the article / poll, ya know who had a higher average approval rating than Barry did? That's Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight:


Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuush!

What were their final approval ratings? that is what counts. If your team loses a game, but were ahead for most of it, you still lost. You guys are desperate. Alternative facts?

 

[Dot Com]

"Obama Doesn't Get The Gold, Silver Or Bronze For Avg Approval Rating"

Obama Had A Lower Average Approval Rating Than NIXON

"President Barack Obama had a lower average approval rating than a president who resigned and another who was impeached, according to Gallup.

Gallup published Jan. 20 that Obama’s average approval rating was 47.9 percent. When compared to post-World War II presidents, Obama ranks 9th out of 12"

That is a Brent Bozell poll eh ....CNS news LOL

I am impressed that Obama was ranked higher than even Harry Truman ...

lol. Typical for easytroll65 to use a source like that. PoliticalcHick uses them all the time. Tells you a lot

What's even more choice is that it rebleats a CNS rebleat of Gallup.....

gawd but easytroll65 is a rw FAILTroll extraordinaire

 

[Rustic]

Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid

Really?!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.

Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!

Seriously.......you're a ******* idiot...

Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?

In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.

Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."

Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star

All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.
It's a socialist thing

Did you come up with that number, Dumbass?

Bush and Foreign Aid

Waste fraud and abuse… bush's foreign aid

 

[Dot Com]

44 was a horrible POTUS....the facts clearly show that....

His outgoing Gallup JARs were 59%.....

How does that compare to everyone?

Did CNS/TuckerCarlson not labor that?

We're not discussing your alt-facts however....,

There is no such thing as "alt-facts"......

Why would Tucker rebleat the CNS version of the Gallup release?

Why not refer directly to Gallup?

Despite subpar approval ratings for much of his presidency, Obama finished strong. His final job approval rating, based on Jan. 17-19 Gallup Daily tracking, was 59%. Only Clinton (66%) and Reagan (63%) had higher scores in Gallup's last measurement of their approval ratings, while Eisenhower (59%) and Kennedy (58%) had similar final ratings.

Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President


Oh.......THAT'S why!

See post #6 for alt-facts....

This is the source

Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President

See the Gallup thing?

It's the same Gallup....

Which of its facts are "alt"?

O........there is much Stupid round here, yet you stand out among your fellow sheeple......there's quite a bit of Bripat about you, lad.....

owebo is just another rw poo slinger like OP. They are legion here.

 

[IcebergSlim]

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Show me your math, Eaze......be sure to cinch that duct tape snood real tight.......cause I'm gonna take Reality upside your empty head and "get the Led out", so to speak....

I did show it to you. What - you want me to draw a picture for you?

BTW, it's 'get the LEAD out', so to speak.

get the lead out
phrase of lead

1. 1.
   North Americaninformal
   move or work more quickly.
   synonyms: hurry up, get a move on, be quick;

In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

09/30/2009 11,909,829,003,511.75
09/30/2008 10,024,724,896,912.49
09/30/2007 9,007,653,372,262.48

Government - Historical Debt Outstanding - Annual 2000 - 2015

Here, for example, you are only off by 100%...

Further, why are you letting Scrub off the hook for his spending requests of FY 2008 and FY2009? (Rhetorical.......you are doing so because you are a credulous imbecile)

 

[IcebergSlim]

Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid

Really?!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.

Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!

Seriously.......you're a ******* idiot...

Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?

In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.

Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."

Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star

All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.
It's a socialist thing

Did you come up with that number, Dumbass?

Bush and Foreign Aid

Waste fraud and abuse… bush's foreign aid

A number, you ******* fraud.....

how does a citation from 2003 tell us what Scrub spent in that category between 2001 and 2009?


You're a ******* idiot.....why do you even bother?

 

[Rustic]

Really?!

In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.

Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.

Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!

Seriously.......you're a ******* idiot...

Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?

In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.

Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."

Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star

All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.
It's a socialist thing

Did you come up with that number, Dumbass?

Bush and Foreign Aid

Waste fraud and abuse… bush's foreign aid

A number, you ******* fraud.....

how does a citation from 2003 tell us what Scrub spent in that category between 2001 and 2009?


You're a ******* idiot.....why do you even bother?

100% of it was waste fraud and abuse... that a good enough number for you today?
Billions and billions of dollars wasted

 

[IcebergSlim]

His outgoing Gallup JARs were 59%.....

How does that compare to everyone?

Did CNS/TuckerCarlson not labor that?

We're not discussing your alt-facts however....,

There is no such thing as "alt-facts"......

Why would Tucker rebleat the CNS version of the Gallup release?

Why not refer directly to Gallup?

Despite subpar approval ratings for much of his presidency, Obama finished strong. His final job approval rating, based on Jan. 17-19 Gallup Daily tracking, was 59%. Only Clinton (66%) and Reagan (63%) had higher scores in Gallup's last measurement of their approval ratings, while Eisenhower (59%) and Kennedy (58%) had similar final ratings.

Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President


Oh.......THAT'S why!

See post #6 for alt-facts....

This is the source

Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President

See the Gallup thing?

It's the same Gallup....

Which of its facts are "alt"?

O........there is much Stupid round here, yet you stand out among your fellow sheeple......there's quite a bit of Bripat about you, lad.....

owebo is just another rw poo slinger like OP. They are legion here.

Another Dumbass for Trump.....

 

[IcebergSlim]

Seriously.......you're a ******* idiot...

Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?

In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.

Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."

Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star

All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.
It's a socialist thing

Did you come up with that number, Dumbass?

Bush and Foreign Aid

Waste fraud and abuse… bush's foreign aid

A number, you ******* fraud.....

how does a citation from 2003 tell us what Scrub spent in that category between 2001 and 2009?


You're a ******* idiot.....why do you even bother?

100% of it was waste fraud and abuse... that a good enough number for you today?
Billions and billions of dollars wasted

Rustic,

Give it up......you're an idiot......

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

… Of other peoples money.
It's a socialist thing

then we have the Right Orange Poltroon in charge there good buddy
Trump: 'There's nothing like doing things with other people's money ..
How Trump Rides on Waves of Other People's Money - Bloomberg
How Donald Trump Used Other People's Money to Avoid Paying