Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[postman]

Your problem with that line of thinking is Obama has been caught ordering Intel assessments altered to make it look like Russia did interfere on Trump behalf.

And George W. Bush altered intel assessments

 

[Delldude]

I already did. It’s not like you read the sources anyway.

Funny I saw images with no link.

Cheating again?

 

[Delldude]

And George W. Bush altered intel assessments

Did it affect the 2016 election?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Biden didn't withhold a penny.
And he was operating under the authority of Obama. Because only Obama had the power to hold up any funding.
When the Ukraine president questioned Biden about his authority, Biden told him to call Obama. Because it was Obama and the EU and not Biden calling for the prosecutors ouster.

so, if Obama as President could withhold money why couldn't Trump as President do the same? Or didn't you think of that when you typed that?

 

[Marener]

Funny I saw images with no link.

Cheating again?

It’s an expert from the report I already linked to.

Which you’d know if you had bother to read it.

Obviously you didn’t.

 

[Marener]

so, if Obama as President could withhold money why couldn't Trump as President do the same? Or didn't you think of that when you typed that?

Depends on the reason the money is withheld. If it’s done for the interest of the country, it’s okay. If it’s done for personal partisan reasons, it’s corrupt.

 

[postman]

Ok, but you're wrong again Gene.

Are you saying a president can't order his troops to surrender?

Do you have a citation except from Galaxy Quest, to "Never give up, never surrender"

 

[postman]

Nationwide injunctions come to mind or are you living under a rock?

Nationwide injunctions were 100% legal, until the Supreme Court ruled that they weren't.

There were decades of precedent under which they previously functioned.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Nationwide injunctions come to mind or are you living under a rock?

What's wrong with nationwide injunctions, simp?

 

[postman]

Depends on the reason the money is withheld. If it’s done for the interest of the country, it’s okay. If it’s done for personal partisan reasons, it’s corrupt.

Obama wasn't holding back appropriated congressional funds, he was holding back executive agency loan guarantees.

And remember, Obama was head of the executive agencies.

Government loan guarantees are typically authorized by the federal agency responsible for the specific program or initiative. This is because different government entities administer different types of loan guarantee programs, each with specific eligibility criteria and approval processes.

 

[postman]

What's wrong with nationwide injunctions, simp?

The supreme court narrowed them down for similarly situated plaintiffs, having to be part of a certified class action.

Otherwise each plaintiff would have to file a separate lawsuit in their district. Leading to massive duplications, and the involvement of hundreds of judges.

 

[postman]

Did it affect the 2016 election?

No , it killed thousands of Americans, tens of thousands of Iraqi's, and cost the nation around $2 trillion.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Depends on the reason the money is withheld. If it’s done for the interest of the country, it’s okay. If it’s done for personal partisan reasons, it’s corrupt.

LOL so you change the terms and suddenly two presidents doing the same thing are different and one was impeached unsuccessfully for it.

 

[Marener]

Did it affect the 2016 election?

Did the January 2017 ICA affect the November 2016 election?

Cmon man.

 

[Marener]

LOL so you change the terms and suddenly two presidents doing the same thing are different and one was impeached unsuccessfully for it.

It’s literally the definition of abuse of office. No one changed anything.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

The supreme court narrowed them down for similarly situated plaintiffs, having to be part of a certified class action.

Otherwise each plaintiff would have to file a separate lawsuit in their district. Leading to massive duplications, and the involvement of hundreds of judges.

I know. I'm asking this useless MAGA simp why he has a problem with them.

 

[postman]

so, if Obama as President could withhold money why couldn't Trump as President do the same? Or didn't you think of that when you typed that?

As I posted. Trump held up "congressionally appropriated weapons" Meaning the president was obligated by oath, to faithfully execute that law.

As opposed to Obama holding back loan guarantees, which are squarely an executive branch (which the president heads) function.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

As I posted. Trump held up "congressionally appropriated weapons" Meaning the president was obligated by oath, to faithfully execute that law.

As opposed to Obama holding back loan guarantees, which are squarely an executive branch (which the president heads) function.

and yet Ukraine got the weapons Trump didn't hold up anything. Go figure.

 

[postman]

I know. I'm asking this useless MAGA simp why he has a problem with them.

It's funny, when they didn't have a problem with them under Clinton, Obama or Biden.

 

[postman]

and yet Ukraine got the weapons Trump didn't hold up anything. Go figure.

Just like strangling somebody, and saying you eventually let him have air after he went brain dead.

So it's as if you never strangled him.

Think for once.