Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[Delldude]

I did.

DMD

 

[Marener]

Recently declassified Intel documents show what was released for public consumption and what was actually found painted two different pictures.

The report I gave you is the recently declassified intel document that shows what was portrayed was high confidence and they think it should have been moderate confidence.

You obviously didn’t read the declassified intel.

 

[postman]

Just,like Joe Biden witholding monies if they didn't fire a guy?

Biden didn't withhold a penny.
And he was operating under the authority of Obama. Because only Obama had the power to hold up any funding.
When the Ukraine president questioned Biden about his authority, Biden told him to call Obama. Because it was Obama and the EU and not Biden calling for the prosecutors ouster.

 

[postman]

You can't prove this, simp.

Especially when Obama held a press conference in Dec 2016 and stated that the Russians did not actually change the votes on any ballots during the 2016 election. You can watch it for yourself.

Obama explained how the Russians interfered in other ways -- like posting fake information about Hillary Clinton on Facebook. And that is a fact, whether your MAGA simpleton ass accepts it or not.

The famous quote where facebook accepted $200,000 in ads paid for in rubles.

 

[postman]

But at the same time, he and his clown posse floated the lie that Russia was helping Trump to win.

While it's been found Russia actually wanted HRC to win.

Russia, if you're listening....

And then Roger Stone helped get Assange and others to release stolen information.

 

[Delldude]

The report I gave you is the recently declassified intel document that shows what was portrayed was high confidence and they think it should have been moderate confidence.

It says absolutely nothing to what you're trying to claim

 

[Marener]

It says absolutely nothing to what you're trying to claim

 

[Delldude]

Actually treason is a presidential function.
Such as the president can order military materials be delivered to another country, even if that country is the "enemy". And it's within his authority as commander -in-chief.

So even treason, can be a presidential function.

A president can be impeached for it, but not prosecuted after Trump V US.

You're misunderstanding what treason is and it's not a presidential function, Gene.

 

[Delldude]

View attachment 1141558

That's not what you posted.

No link.....

 

[postman]

Recently declassified Intel documents show what was released for public consumption and what was actually found painted two different pictures.

Let me remind you of an important FACT, you keep forgetting.
After November Trump was briefed on EVERYTHING that Obama was given a PDB on

So when the intelligence assessment on russian interference in the 2016 election was given to Obama, Trump got an identical copy

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

I don't really give a damn, how's that?

Great comeback, MAGA simp.

You've got no facts, no game, and no intellect.....as always. Just a lying piece of shit.

 

[Delldude]

Great comeback, MAGA simp.

You've got no facts, no game, and no intellect.....as always. Just a lying piece of shit.

Classic phosphorus.....

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Recently declassified Intel documents show what was released for public consumption and what was actually found painted two different pictures.

Nah....you see what you want to see. Just a dishonest MAGA simp.

 

[postman]

You're misunderstanding what treason is and it's not a presidential function, Gene.

I just showed you an example of treason (by definition) and that it was a presidential function.

The commander in chief can in time of war, order his troops to surrender, thereby giving aid and comfort to the enemy, and that would be squarely a presidential function.

 

[sartre play]

More distraction, Keeping us angry, and NEVER looking at the whole picture.

 

[Delldude]

I just showed you an example of treason (by definition) and that it was a presidential function.

The commander in chief can in time of war, order his troops to surrender, thereby giving aid and comfort to the enemy, and that would be squarely a presidential function.

Ok, but you're wrong again Gene.

 

[Marener]

That's not what you posted.

No link.....

It said that moderate confidence was consistent with standards.

You pretend that the intelligence was fabricated, but really you’re just butt hurt and disagree with the conclusion.

 

[Delldude]

It said that moderate confidence was consistent with standards.

You pretend that the intelligence was fabricated, but really you’re just butt hurt and disagree with the conclusion.

Post the source.....

 

[Marener]

Post the source.....

I already did. It’s not like you read the sources anyway.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Could you cite an example?

Nationwide injunctions come to mind or are you living under a rock?