Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

That’s totally delusional.
so what do you call it when a sitting POTUS and his CIA director change an ICA at the last minute to reflect what the intelligence agencies did NOT find instead of what they DID find that results in a hyperbolic media, continual false accusations of colluding with an enemy and a 2 year obsession with a false narrative?
 
Whenever the president engages in any political campaign, he is acting as a private citizen and not as president and is subject to all the laws other citizens are.
The election was over, so he couldn’t be engaging in a political campaign.
 
It was pretty clear that Putin preferred Trump because he used his intelligence agencies to go after Clinton.
That has never been proven true. I gave you the link. Did you lose it again?

And you never answered (of course not answering questions is your go to with difficult questions) why did Russia not publicize the emails from the DNC showing that Hillary is a psycho and that she pressured and bribed religious leaders to support her?

Why did Russia never use that information against her if they were so enamored with Trump?
 
That they failed does not change what it was. Just another straw man from you.
They never tried, obviously. Releasing an intelligence assessment doesn’t remove people from office.

Trump tried to keep Biden out of office but that was just fine.
 
That has never been proven true. I gave you the link. Did you lose it again?

And you never answered (of course not answering questions is your go to with difficult questions) why did Russia not publicize the emails from the DNC showing that Hillary is a psycho and that she pressured and bribed religious leaders to support her?

Why did Russia never use that information against her if they were so enamored with Trump?
Your link to the Republican report? I saw it. It’s not objective.

I thought we already discovered that there was no such Russian intelligence. Why do you keep repeating their propaganda?
 
They never tried, obviously. Releasing an intelligence assessment doesn’t remove people from office.
LOL

You already forgot a lesson I taught you.

What did the fake ICA produced by Brennan and ordered by Obama result in?
 
LOL

You already forgot a lesson I taught you.

What did the fake ICA produced by Brennan and ordered by Obama result in?
You tell me. I don’t think it “resulted” in anything.
 
Your link to the Republican report? I saw it. It’s not objective.
No, dummy. The RCP investigation. You lost it, didn't you? Quantity never makes up for such poor quality, mariner. Pay attention.

It was not necessarily the Russians that hacked the DNC. I gave you a very convincing link from an objective source about an hour ago.
 
You tell me. I don’t think it “resulted” in anything.
Right because you only think what is taught to you by your media and leaders. (same thing)

It resulted in the Mueller investigation, which even you cannot disagree with. It also contributed to Impeachment I.

Now try to remember that the fake ICA ended up being used as ammunition against Trump and causing the Mueller investigation, a two year hyperbolic ball of bull shit that hurt Trumps first term.

Just as Obama and Brennan planned it. AKA attempted coup.
 
No, dummy. The RCP investigation. You lost it, didn't you? Quantity never makes up for such poor quality, mariner. Pay attention.

It was not necessarily the Russians that hacked the DNC. I gave you a very convincing link from an objective source about an hour ago.
RCP is NOT objective. It’s definitely the Russians that hacked the DNC. RCP took one comment out of all the evidence and conflated that into doubt. That comment doesn’t even point towards any one else hacking the DNC. There is only doubt when you ignore the mountain of evidence that it was Russia which any reasonable person would agree with.
 
This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

Silly rabbit, laws are for Democrats.
 
Right because you only think what is taught to you by your media and leaders. (same thing)

It resulted in the Mueller investigation, which even you cannot disagree with. It also contributed to Impeachment I.

Now try to remember that the fake ICA ended up being used as ammunition against Trump and causing the Mueller investigation, a two year hyperbolic ball of bull shit that hurt Trumps first term.

Just as Obama and Brennan planned it. AKA attempted coup.
The Mueller investigation was the result of Comey being fired and us finding out that Trump and his administration was lying a lot about Russia.


It didn’t contribute to the first impeachment. There is no relationship.
 
he Mueller investigation was the result of Comey being fired and us finding out that Trump and his administration was lying a lot about Russia.
Set up by the fake ICA. It came first, just as Obama and Brennan planned.
 
Wrong again. You really have a problem with being wrong, don't you?

Leftists think anything not rated extremely left is biased.

Your link came from realclearinvestigations.com. Not from realclearpolitics.com.


My criticism stands.
 
15th post
Set up by the fake ICA. It came first, just as Obama and Brennan planned.
Now you’re just making shit up.

There already was a preexisting FBI investigation and they had already determined with high confidence that Russia was helping Trump, a finding that was confirmed by Mueller.
 
This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.
That’s good news.
 
Your link came from realclearinvestigations.com. Not from realclearpolitics.com.
That is true and here's a source that actually rated RCI and it rated them center right and mostly factual. I am not a fan of the Bias rating source because I've never found them to be unbiased but that rating is good enough to be called objective.

All Sides, which is my go to unbiased bias rater, did not rate RCI.


Now go read the article I linked, coward.
 
Last edited:
Mueller investigated and had extensive evidence they did it.

Bullshit.

A few social media posts does not constitutes extensive evidence.

You leftards are horrible liars.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom