Obama calls IRS targetting outrageous

[yidnar]

This is Chicago style politics at it's best. The whole bunch should be brought up on charges. Obama, Jarrett, Clinton and all the way down to the low level pencil pushing brown shirt scum at the IRS. This and Benghazi will not go away. Just think about it Obama lovers...this could be his one and only legacy with his health care plan falling apart the way it is now.

I agree that these are damaging issues to the Dear Leader ,but the AP scandal is the catalyst that turned some in the left wing media against him !! he kicked his own guard dogs !! and they are growling !! main stream leftist media hated Bush , but if they start scrutinizing Obama one tenth as much they scrutinized and attacked Bush then the Dear Leader is finished !!

The 1st rule every President should remember: Never attack the media.

the man is so narcissistic that he has angered his biggest buffer against the truth .

 

[Locke11_21]

It would be great if you nutters would, for once, take the time to understand what has happened before going all nuts.

The problem here is we've been warning everyone about what Obama would do and now everything we've been saying has become a reality.

There's a big difference between "reality" and "Bubble-land reality".

Obviously you live in "Bubble-land reality"

We've learned that the GOP is really stretching to find something with the Benghazi issue and all they've come up with is "how many times the CIA changed their talking points before releasing them" - that's a real crime, you know.

The real crime is how hactivists like you could care less about the 4 dead Americans, just as long as those wanting answers are destroyed all in order to protect Obama and save Hillary's 2016 campaign.

Desperate times call for desperate actions.

The way people with your political views are reacting, and going to the usual Pavlonian....Booooooshhhh, is proof your side is indeed desperate. But hey, the end justifies the means, just make sure Democrats come out the winners!

Not at all. That you were used to the illiterate bozo makes you think that because Obama is eloquent that he must be lying

I find it most hilarious when you attack Bush's intelligence, yet the village idiot we have in office right now thinks we have 57 states, referred to the Prime Minister of Canada as the President of Canada, Navy "Corpsemen", making a total ass of himself by accusing the Cambridge Police Dpt of acting stupidly...and having to have a beer summit to cool things down....ohhhhh I can keep going, but I really don't have time to write a book.

but GOPers haven't been able to find a single lie, just accusations. Seems like desperate times for the GOP.

Obama's first lie in politics was, "I, Barack Hussein Obama do solemnly swear...."

There are all kinds of Obama lies out there. Even the left-leaning Washington Post has given him 4 Pinocchios multiple times.

 

[HomeInspect]

"Not at all. That you were used to the illiterate bozo makes you think that because Obama is eloquent that he must be lying, but GOPers haven't been able to find a single lie, just accusations. Seems like desperate times for the GOP. "
Not being a good speaker doesn't make you illiterate.
Did Obama lie when he said there would be no lobbyists in the white house?
did he lie when he said it would be the most transparent administration?
Did he lie when he said he would cut the deficit in half?
those are 3 quick ones, without hardly thinking. You might want to get off the kool-aid.

 

[HomeInspect]

The president is not just a liar, he is clueless

From White House Spokespeople:

Bengahazi - Oh the president didn't know anything about that.

IRS attacks on conservative organizations - Oh the president didn't know anything about that.

Stealing press phone records - Oh the President didn't know anything about that

There are two possible conclusions. Either they are lying on behalf of the president at his request, or the president is clueless about what is going on in his administration and is out of the leadership loop. Either is unforgivable.

 

[HomeInspect]

This is the same IRS that will be overseeing Obamcare. How many times have the mindless on this board used the word "paranoid" when someone posts about government control, or overstepping their bounds?
This is why the left are the ones who always later ask, " How did that happen?"

 

[LoneLaugher]

John Mica ( FL ) currently on C-Span dishing out vague charges regarding this matter. He likes to tell us what he heard or read somewhere. Irresponsible fuckers like this cannot help themselves from grandstanding and asking provocative questions. But.....no, no, no....he would not want to speculate.

 

[The Professor]

I like to give Obama credit when he does the right thing.

He did the right thing.

Amid outcry over revelations that Internal Revenue Service specialists specifically targeted conservative groups for scrutiny before the 2012 elections, President Barack Obama said Monday that the tax agency employees' reported conduct was "outrageous" and "contrary to our traditions."
Appearing at a White House press conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron, the president said he does not want to judge the findings of an Inspector General investigation "prematurely" but said that if the reports of political targeting are found to be correct, those responsible must be held "fully accountable."
"If in fact IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that have been reported on and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that’s outrageous and there’s no place for it," he said

Obama: IRS targeting of conservative groups 'outrageous' - First Read

You don't know much about politics, do you?

Obama’s statement may have been “the right thing to do;” however, his words do not prove he is genuinely concerned about the matter. It was the right thing to do, and it was the smart thing to do, and it was the politically correct thing to do. I suspect that every politically savvy person on the planet expected him to say what he did. Politicians have done the same thing throughout history when confronted with wrongdoing which may somehow be associated with their own administration: they publicly condemn it. They condemn it to distance themselves from the whole mess. It sure as hell doesn't mean they're sincere, and it does not mean they were not involved.

News flash: politicians lie for a lot of reasons, and they will lie their ass off to protect themselves themselves from public embarrassment. There is no doubt in my mind that Obama would have said the same thing whether he was truly outraged or whether he approved of the IRS shenanigans. In reality, if Obama were personally involved in the fiasco, he had three choices: (1) admit his involvement (and we all know that would never happen); (2) remain silent which would indicate an indifference to the matter; or (3) condemn the acts, thus appearing to be concerned. I am not saying Obama was involved in the IRS debacle; instead, I am saying he would have made the same statement even if he privately approved of the actions of the IRS. Thus, his self-serving statement means nothing.

So what does Obama’s statement tell you about him? It obviously tells you he is a man of deep principle who is offended by the unethical escapades of the IRS. As for me, it tells me nothing, nothing at all. You give Obama credit for uttering those words. I give him neither credit nor criticism. Those words without appropriate action are hollow and meaningless. I have lived long enough to know that most often mere words, especially those that come from politicians, mean nothing. I am looking past his words and waiting to see what he DOES about it.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

I like to give Obama credit when he does the right thing.

He did the right thing.

Amid outcry over revelations that Internal Revenue Service specialists specifically targeted conservative groups for scrutiny before the 2012 elections, President Barack Obama said Monday that the tax agency employees' reported conduct was "outrageous" and "contrary to our traditions."
Appearing at a White House press conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron, the president said he does not want to judge the findings of an Inspector General investigation "prematurely" but said that if the reports of political targeting are found to be correct, those responsible must be held "fully accountable."
"If in fact IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that have been reported on and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that’s outrageous and there’s no place for it," he said

Obama: IRS targeting of conservative groups 'outrageous' - First Read

You don't know much about politics, do you?

Obama’s statement may have been “the right thing to do;” however, his words do not prove he is genuinely concerned about the matter. It was the right thing to do, and it was the smart thing to do, and it was the politically correct thing to do. I suspect that every politically savvy person on the planet expected him to say what he did. Politicians have done the same thing throughout history when confronted with wrongdoing which may somehow be associated with their own administration: they publicly condemn it. They condemn it to distance themselves from the whole mess. It sure as hell doesn't mean they're sincere, and it does not mean they were not involved.

News flash: politicians lie for a lot of reasons, and they will lie their ass off to protect themselves themselves from public embarrassment. There is no doubt in my mind that Obama would have said the same thing whether he was truly outraged or whether he approved of the IRS shenanigans. In reality, if Obama were personally involved in the fiasco, he had three choices: (1) admit his involvement (and we all know that would never happen); (2) remain silent which would indicate an indifference to the matter; or (3) condemn the acts, thus appearing to be concerned. I am not saying Obama was involved in the IRS debacle; instead, I am saying he would have made the same statement even if he privately approved of the actions of the IRS. Thus, his self-serving statement means nothing.

So what does Obama’s statement tell you about him? It obviously tells you he is a man of deep principle who is offended by the unethical escapades of the IRS. As for me, it tells me nothing, nothing at all. You give Obama credit for uttering those words. I give him neither credit nor criticism. Those words without appropriate action are hollow and meaningless. I have lived long enough to know that most often mere words, especially those that come from politicians, mean nothing. I am looking past his words and waiting to see what he DOES about it.

Obama's statement did not tell me anything about him other than that he did the right thing.

 

[The Professor]

I like to give Obama credit when he does the right thing.

He did the right thing.

Obama: IRS targeting of conservative groups 'outrageous' - First Read

You don't know much about politics, do you?

Obama’s statement may have been “the right thing to do;” however, his words do not prove he is genuinely concerned about the matter. It was the right thing to do, and it was the smart thing to do, and it was the politically correct thing to do. I suspect that every politically savvy person on the planet expected him to say what he did. Politicians have done the same thing throughout history when confronted with wrongdoing which may somehow be associated with their own administration: they publicly condemn it. They condemn it to distance themselves from the whole mess. It sure as hell doesn't mean they're sincere, and it does not mean they were not involved.

News flash: politicians lie for a lot of reasons, and they will lie their ass off to protect themselves themselves from public embarrassment. There is no doubt in my mind that Obama would have said the same thing whether he was truly outraged or whether he approved of the IRS shenanigans. In reality, if Obama were personally involved in the fiasco, he had three choices: (1) admit his involvement (and we all know that would never happen); (2) remain silent which would indicate an indifference to the matter; or (3) condemn the acts, thus appearing to be concerned. I am not saying Obama was involved in the IRS debacle; instead, I am saying he would have made the same statement even if he privately approved of the actions of the IRS. Thus, his self-serving statement means nothing.

So what does Obama’s statement tell you about him? It obviously tells you he is a man of deep principle who is offended by the unethical escapades of the IRS. As for me, it tells me nothing, nothing at all. You give Obama credit for uttering those words. I give him neither credit nor criticism. Those words without appropriate action are hollow and meaningless. I have lived long enough to know that most often mere words, especially those that come from politicians, mean nothing. I am looking past his words and waiting to see what he DOES about it.

Obama's statement did not tell me anything about him other than that he did the right thing.

In other words, you gave the man credit for saying something that everyone else expected him to say whether he was sincere or not; something he would have said even if he was involved in the whole IRS affair.

Frankly, I don't think anyone deserves credit for saying what everyone else would have said in the same circumstances. But you were so enamored by Obama's common, predictable and meaningless utterance that you started a thread to praise him for it. I expected more from you. Oh, well, to each his own.

OK, I am done with you and your thread.

 

[freedombecki]

You don't know much about politics, do you?

Obama’s statement may have been “the right thing to do;” however, his words do not prove he is genuinely concerned about the matter. It was the right thing to do, and it was the smart thing to do, and it was the politically correct thing to do. I suspect that every politically savvy person on the planet expected him to say what he did. Politicians have done the same thing throughout history when confronted with wrongdoing which may somehow be associated with their own administration: they publicly condemn it. They condemn it to distance themselves from the whole mess. It sure as hell doesn't mean they're sincere, and it does not mean they were not involved.

News flash: politicians lie for a lot of reasons, and they will lie their ass off to protect themselves themselves from public embarrassment. There is no doubt in my mind that Obama would have said the same thing whether he was truly outraged or whether he approved of the IRS shenanigans. In reality, if Obama were personally involved in the fiasco, he had three choices: (1) admit his involvement (and we all know that would never happen); (2) remain silent which would indicate an indifference to the matter; or (3) condemn the acts, thus appearing to be concerned. I am not saying Obama was involved in the IRS debacle; instead, I am saying he would have made the same statement even if he privately approved of the actions of the IRS. Thus, his self-serving statement means nothing.

So what does Obama’s statement tell you about him? It obviously tells you he is a man of deep principle who is offended by the unethical escapades of the IRS. As for me, it tells me nothing, nothing at all. You give Obama credit for uttering those words. I give him neither credit nor criticism. Those words without appropriate action are hollow and meaningless. I have lived long enough to know that most often mere words, especially those that come from politicians, mean nothing. I am looking past his words and waiting to see what he DOES about it.

Obama's statement did not tell me anything about him other than that he did the right thing.

In other words, you gave the man credit for saying something that everyone else expected him to say whether he was sincere or not; something he would have said even if he was involved in the whole IRS affair.

Frankly, I don't think anyone deserves credit for saying what everyone else would have said in the same circumstances. But you were so enamored by Obama's common, predictable and meaningless utterance that you started a thread to praise him for it. I expected more from you. Oh, well, to each his own.

OK, I am done with you and your thread.

I think Barack Obama is a deeply troubled man. I hope the eight years he serves as president will teach him that America is a reputable country that does worthy things for other people in the world, backs its friends, and upbraids those who fail to do the right thing.

I think when several people found the same flier from some promotion he was doing that claimed he was a Kenyan, it made "birthers" feel they were right, but was ignored by the press and the entire boatload of Democrats, except for a couple who started wondering why this was written into a promotional brochure.

I think he has learned a couple of things--not to besmirch America when he goes abroad, and not to promise other wealthy nations America's real estate under the table, and disregarded by press reporters who are on his side and not on the people's right to know side any more.

Three or four years ago, Obama viewed as his dream come true seemed to be ensuring that conservative and traditional Americans besmirched while he slipped a mickey through a Pelosi-led House in which she assured an obviously drugged mass of Representatives to "Don't read, just pass, so we can all find out what is in the bill," which has to be the all-time record idiotic thing ever proscribed to a Congress that decides on funding for leadership in the Free World.

As America is encouraged to destroy its financial base by taking people's wealth away from them rather than encouraging those who consider themselves have-nots to work harder to succeed, we may become followers of others rather than leaders, which brings us back full-circle to the days when we were taxed with no representation whatever by a British king who regarded "the colonists" as too riff-raff to receive his notice.

Had we stayed true to some of the founders' principles, we would have a President who never had to be prodded into caring that good comes to the people of America and not bad by making deals with people who truly despise America and will until their dying day just because we have been God's faithful servants in reaching out to other people in the best way we could.

 

[Mertex]

Now they're trying to pin the IRS issue on Obama when it was done during Bush, too!

But...but...BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!

Bush isn't in office anymore. Obama is the one in office now.

I know, but I just can't imagine why it wasn't a big deal when Bush did it?

 

[S.J.]

I like to give Obama credit when he does the right thing.

He did the right thing.

Obama: IRS targeting of conservative groups 'outrageous' - First Read

You don't know much about politics, do you?

Obama’s statement may have been “the right thing to do;” however, his words do not prove he is genuinely concerned about the matter. It was the right thing to do, and it was the smart thing to do, and it was the politically correct thing to do. I suspect that every politically savvy person on the planet expected him to say what he did. Politicians have done the same thing throughout history when confronted with wrongdoing which may somehow be associated with their own administration: they publicly condemn it. They condemn it to distance themselves from the whole mess. It sure as hell doesn't mean they're sincere, and it does not mean they were not involved.

News flash: politicians lie for a lot of reasons, and they will lie their ass off to protect themselves themselves from public embarrassment. There is no doubt in my mind that Obama would have said the same thing whether he was truly outraged or whether he approved of the IRS shenanigans. In reality, if Obama were personally involved in the fiasco, he had three choices: (1) admit his involvement (and we all know that would never happen); (2) remain silent which would indicate an indifference to the matter; or (3) condemn the acts, thus appearing to be concerned. I am not saying Obama was involved in the IRS debacle; instead, I am saying he would have made the same statement even if he privately approved of the actions of the IRS. Thus, his self-serving statement means nothing.

So what does Obama’s statement tell you about him? It obviously tells you he is a man of deep principle who is offended by the unethical escapades of the IRS. As for me, it tells me nothing, nothing at all. You give Obama credit for uttering those words. I give him neither credit nor criticism. Those words without appropriate action are hollow and meaningless. I have lived long enough to know that most often mere words, especially those that come from politicians, mean nothing. I am looking past his words and waiting to see what he DOES about it.

Obama's statement did not tell me anything about him other than that he did the right thing.

He SAID the right thing. Whether or not he DOES the right thing remains to be seen.

 

[Unkotare]

All that law school learnin' finally came in handy!


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRhW_zMlf0Y]Jacky - Kramer The coffee - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Quantum Windbag]

You don't know much about politics, do you?

Obama’s statement may have been “the right thing to do;” however, his words do not prove he is genuinely concerned about the matter. It was the right thing to do, and it was the smart thing to do, and it was the politically correct thing to do. I suspect that every politically savvy person on the planet expected him to say what he did. Politicians have done the same thing throughout history when confronted with wrongdoing which may somehow be associated with their own administration: they publicly condemn it. They condemn it to distance themselves from the whole mess. It sure as hell doesn't mean they're sincere, and it does not mean they were not involved.

News flash: politicians lie for a lot of reasons, and they will lie their ass off to protect themselves themselves from public embarrassment. There is no doubt in my mind that Obama would have said the same thing whether he was truly outraged or whether he approved of the IRS shenanigans. In reality, if Obama were personally involved in the fiasco, he had three choices: (1) admit his involvement (and we all know that would never happen); (2) remain silent which would indicate an indifference to the matter; or (3) condemn the acts, thus appearing to be concerned. I am not saying Obama was involved in the IRS debacle; instead, I am saying he would have made the same statement even if he privately approved of the actions of the IRS. Thus, his self-serving statement means nothing.

So what does Obama’s statement tell you about him? It obviously tells you he is a man of deep principle who is offended by the unethical escapades of the IRS. As for me, it tells me nothing, nothing at all. You give Obama credit for uttering those words. I give him neither credit nor criticism. Those words without appropriate action are hollow and meaningless. I have lived long enough to know that most often mere words, especially those that come from politicians, mean nothing. I am looking past his words and waiting to see what he DOES about it.

Obama's statement did not tell me anything about him other than that he did the right thing.

In other words, you gave the man credit for saying something that everyone else expected him to say whether he was sincere or not; something he would have said even if he was involved in the whole IRS affair.

Frankly, I don't think anyone deserves credit for saying what everyone else would have said in the same circumstances. But you were so enamored by Obama's common, predictable and meaningless utterance that you started a thread to praise him for it. I expected more from you. Oh, well, to each his own.

OK, I am done with you and your thread.

He could have said all sorts of things. If you want to gripe you should grope about how he is not actually following up on what he said, not that he said it.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

You don't know much about politics, do you?

Obama’s statement may have been “the right thing to do;” however, his words do not prove he is genuinely concerned about the matter. It was the right thing to do, and it was the smart thing to do, and it was the politically correct thing to do. I suspect that every politically savvy person on the planet expected him to say what he did. Politicians have done the same thing throughout history when confronted with wrongdoing which may somehow be associated with their own administration: they publicly condemn it. They condemn it to distance themselves from the whole mess. It sure as hell doesn't mean they're sincere, and it does not mean they were not involved.

News flash: politicians lie for a lot of reasons, and they will lie their ass off to protect themselves themselves from public embarrassment. There is no doubt in my mind that Obama would have said the same thing whether he was truly outraged or whether he approved of the IRS shenanigans. In reality, if Obama were personally involved in the fiasco, he had three choices: (1) admit his involvement (and we all know that would never happen); (2) remain silent which would indicate an indifference to the matter; or (3) condemn the acts, thus appearing to be concerned. I am not saying Obama was involved in the IRS debacle; instead, I am saying he would have made the same statement even if he privately approved of the actions of the IRS. Thus, his self-serving statement means nothing.

So what does Obama’s statement tell you about him? It obviously tells you he is a man of deep principle who is offended by the unethical escapades of the IRS. As for me, it tells me nothing, nothing at all. You give Obama credit for uttering those words. I give him neither credit nor criticism. Those words without appropriate action are hollow and meaningless. I have lived long enough to know that most often mere words, especially those that come from politicians, mean nothing. I am looking past his words and waiting to see what he DOES about it.

Obama's statement did not tell me anything about him other than that he did the right thing.

He SAID the right thing. Whether or not he DOES the right thing is yet to be seen.

I agree 100%.

 

[Mertex]

The problem here is we've been warning everyone about what Obama would do and now everything we've been saying has become a reality.

There's a big difference between "reality" and "Bubble-land reality".

Obviously you live in "Bubble-land reality"

No, that would be Faux News bubble-land, and I don't watch Faux News, so, er, no!

The real crime is how hactivists like you could care less about the 4 dead Americans, just as long as those wanting answers are destroyed all in order to protect Obama and save Hillary's 2016 campaign.

The real crime is how hypocritical Republican/conservatives are. They make a mountain out of a molehile with Benghazi and look the other way over 9/11 and the Iraq war.

The way people with your political views are reacting, and going to the usual Pavlonian....Booooooshhhh, is proof your side is indeed desperate. But hey, the end justifies the means, just make sure Democrats come out the winners!

Funny you say that, since all this Benghazi hoopla is being fabricated in order for GOP to gain political points, but unfortunately not working.

I find it most hilarious when you attack Bush's intelligence, yet the village idiot we have in office right now thinks we have 57 states, referred to the Prime Minister of Canada as the President of Canada, Navy "Corpsemen", making a total ass of himself by accusing the Cambridge Police Dpt of acting stupidly...and having to have a beer summit to cool things down....ohhhhh I can keep going, but I really don't have time to write a book.

Oh please, a few misspeaks do not compare to the many times OBozoBush couldn't talk himself out of a paper bag. Not only could he not form a complete sentence, he couldn't tell an old adage that has been around for years that even 10 year olds can recite. I could keep going but I don't have time to write enough books to fill a Library.

but GOPers haven't been able to find a single lie, just accusations. Seems like desperate times for the GOP.

Obama's first lie in politics was, "I, Barack Hussein Obama do solemnly swear...."

There are all kinds of Obama lies out there. Even the left-leaning Washington Post has given him 4 Pinocchios multiple times.

Lies, isn't that what Republicans are known for?

 

[CaféAuLait]

Charlie Rangel: Obama answers not enough


Charlie Rangel: Obama answers not enough - POLITICO.com

 

[CaféAuLait]

This article was written in 2010



Republicans See a Political Motive in I.R.S. Audits



http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/us/politics/07irs.html?_r=0

 

[Locke11_21]

There's a big difference between "reality" and "Bubble-land reality".

Obviously you live in "Bubble-land reality"

No, that would be Faux News bubble-land, and I don't watch Faux News, so, er, no!

You don't watch FOX, yet you make these statements. All the more proof of lefties only being able to follow and repeat the talking points the Democrat Party and their throne sniffers in the media

The real crime is how hypocritical Republican/conservatives are. They make a mountain out of a molehile with Benghazi and look the other way over 9/11 and the Iraq war.

Completely different circumstances.

Funny you say that, since all this Benghazi hoopla is being fabricated in order for GOP to gain political points, but unfortunately not working.

I wasn't aware that the 4 Americans being killed in Benghazi was fabricated by the GOP. Even Michael Moore can learn a few things from you.

Oh please, a few misspeaks do not compare to the many times OBozoBush couldn't talk himself out of a paper bag. Not only could he not form a complete sentence, he couldn't tell an old adage that has been around for years that even 10 year olds can recite.

I'm certainly no fan of GWB, I have past posts to prove that. While he was not the smartest president, he was clearly smart enough and athletic enough to fly jet fighters. Obama...a community organizer. Attack Bush's intelligence all you want, but at least unlike Obama, he released his transcripts. If Obama was anywhere near as smart as people make him out to be he would've released his transcripts.

I could keep going but I don't have time to write enough books to fill a Library.

Don't worry about not having enough time, because you don't have enough talent either.

 

[freedombecki]

Now they're trying to pin the IRS issue on Obama when it was done during Bush, too!

But...but...BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!

Bush isn't in office anymore. Obama is the one in office now.

I know, but I just can't imagine why it wasn't a big deal when Bush did it?

Mertex, in the long laundry list of alleged Bush personnel losses that liberals are trying to proffer as goods to the public actually represent the loss of only ONE American citizen. The others killed were Arabs killing foreign nationals. Furthermore, the only ONE American killed was killed in a parking lot by a preplanned IED in another car when he was targeted by terrorists from home to work. That means only one thing: one of the foreigners contracted to the care of the parking lot collaborated with and looked the other way as someone else planted that bomb that killed the ONE American killed in that long, laundry list of alleged Bush wrongdoings.

It's not a good idea to blame Bush for doing wrong, when he is the President only of American citizens, and there are bad people in the world. Nobody can hold somebody else's president for their own to be killing their own, now can they?

The issues surrounding Benghazi were made suspicious by falsehoods created by people in the Obama administration to fulfill a political end of seeming to be perfect on election day. Unfortunately, too long have we allowed dirty politics as usual rule our nation. The worst politics are when selected-by-politicians American citizens are targeted on all sides for a loss.

One lesson Obama has not fully realized is unity. He has not unified Americans to support the things he wants done. Instead, he has used the railroad system, ensuring that people who support the tax base the most are made to suffer grandiose losses, pushing American businesses looking for profits outside America's borders so they can still employ at least the same number of people here off the profits they make elsewhere. Putting an end to that by taxing these hopeful employers 35% on their foreign profits returned to the states is putting an end to that.

Was the passage of that measure in order to vilify American businesses a good idea, or did it divide more than it unified Americans behind those who saw to it not one piece of scorched earth would be left to those fighting to bring jobs back to America. They can't. They'd lose their shirts. And Congress made it happen at the behest of those just absolutely lusting after annihilating their perceived "enemies within" whom they created by ignoring the Constitution of the USA in their zest to prove a point that redistribution of wealth must be done with malice aforethought.

Hating other Americans is by far, the worst mistake of the Obama administration. I hope we never have the misery of having another such arcane system imposed over the light the self-sacrificing patriots gave their world in creating America's founding principles.

That's just how I see this ball of wax our nation is mired in.

May it melt, may hate be diffused out, and caring for every American restored. And I mean that. Every American who abides peaceably with his neighbors near and far needs support. Every one.