Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.
This is not a joke or a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.
Read the Article
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q92009...
You mean that some people that deal in other peoples misery and death might not be able to sell guns in the trouble spots of the world. The Merchants of Death are still with us, and still have the pawns defending their blood money.
I think if he tries this...which I'm sure he will, it'll be more then gun-nuts going into a frenzy.
He's gonna open up a legal battle the likes of which this country has never seen.
If the Dems lose Congress Obama will most likely be impeached.
Something is brewing in the White House.....and it makes the health care bill negotiations look honest in comparison:
The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.
This is not a joke or a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.
Read the Article
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q92009...
They said that the Carbon Tax was a myth...and so was the Value Added Tax.....now both of those are close to being a reality. But now this......
whip them gun nuts into a frenzy
I think if he tries this...which I'm sure he will, it'll be more then gun-nuts going into a frenzy.
He's gonna open up a legal battle the likes of which this country has never seen.
If the Dems lose Congress Obama will most likely be impeached.
Don't you ever get tired of being such a loud-mouthed douchebagh full of hysteria and outrage? Do you have family or friends or acquaintances that can pull you back to earth?
The link in the OP yielded a "page not found" error, so I googled it and found it here.
This bill has nothing to do with the Second Amendment, that deals with American people's right to bear arms. It is about arms sales to foreign nations.
Still, arms sales in the US is one sector of the economy that has dramatically improved since the Obama Administration, due to the fear of his detractors that he would try to take our guns away. If enough people can be led to believe that a treaty with other nations regarding arms sales is somehow related to the Second Amendment, then that sector could improve even further.
Do you ever get tired of being a semi-illiterate internet troll?
I'd like to know what it is specifically that they're proposing in regards to regulating arms sales. I don't like that discussion being had AT ALL, personally I'm just not comfortable with that. If anyone should be regulating arm sales it should be elected public officials within the confines of their own sovereign nations. But then again... I'm not a big fan of the UN period.
Yeup... this could be some really heavy bullshit. I was waiting for it. The way the globalists are working right now, I've been very concerned for a very long time. I'm no conspiracy theorist but I do believe there are various groups of people worldwide that consider global gun control a "good thing".
We'll have to see what comes of this. I hope nothing, but I wouldn't be surprised. Self defense and gun rights is vital to the constitution. My right to feel safe in my own home is none of the UN's or anybody else's got-dayum business.
Something is brewing in the White House.....and it makes the health care bill negotiations look honest in comparison:
The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.
This is not a joke or a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.
Read the Article
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q92009...
They said that the Carbon Tax was a myth...and so was the Value Added Tax.....now both of those are close to being a reality. But now this......
You're surprised?
I'd like to know what it is specifically that they're proposing in regards to regulating arms sales. I don't like that discussion being had AT ALL, personally I'm just not comfortable with that. If anyone should be regulating arm sales it should be elected public officials within the confines of their own sovereign nations. But then again... I'm not a big fan of the UN period.
Again, the discussion is about arms sales to other nations, not about sales to individuals in the US. It seems to me a good idea to discuss, maybe even outlaw, arms sales to, say for example, the Taliban.
Don't you think?
the anti-Obama people masking themselves as anti-big-government.
they aren't as anti-big-government as they are anti-Obama.
