NYT says that Texas redistricting is " mustard gassing democracy "

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I have already posted the district map for Massachusetts in this very thread. Now piss of and tell your Mom to send down some more pizza rolls to the basement.

Massachusetts? Why not the others?

 

[Monoculturalist]

That’s the very definition of nativist.

Ok, if that's how we're defining it, then the only other alternative is to have no attachment to a culture.

Personally, I prefer having a culture rather than being at the whims of whatever group happens to immigrate en masse into my area.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The corrupt Democrats claiming to be defending democracy is as ludicrous as Madonna claiming to be defending chastity.
They are fxcking the hell out of it.

 

[scruffy]

MSN

Story by Zachary Leeman
New York Times columnist David Brooks compared redistricting efforts backed by President Donald Trump to using chemical weapons on civilians.

Brooks and Jonathan Capehart joined PBS this week to discuss the ongoing debate around redistricting as well as Trump’s Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Redistricting efforts in Texas have caused multiple Democratic lawmakers to flee the state in protest.

Brooks compared redistricting congressional lines in Texas to Germany using “mustard gas” on civilians in World War I. He then made that the case for why Democrats like California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) should not be responding in the same fashion.

Comment:
No Mr. Brooks, the Democrats are not defending democracy, they are defending their hegemony.
David Brooks and the Democrats have a very strange idea of what democracy is.
The Democrats allowing 11 million poor third worlders to illegally enter our country to create new Democrat congressional districts is mustard gassing democracy.
The Democrats counting illegal immigrants in the census is mustard gassing democracy
The Democrats stuffing ballot boxes is mustard gassing democracy.
The Democrats counting ballots behind locked doors is mustard gassing democracy.
The Democrats blocking Voter ID laws is mustard gassing democracy
The Democrats having more ballots than voters in their precincts is mustard gassing democracy.
The Democrats having 11 states with zero Republican representatives is mustard gassing democracy.
The Democrat bogus impeachments of Trump is mustard gassing democracy.
The Democrat bogus indictments of Trump is mustard gassing democracy.
Joe Bidens banana republic raid on Trumps home is mustard gassing democracy.
Obama illegally using the IRS, CIA, FBI and the DOJ as his political weapons is mustard gassing democracy.

lmao

Libtards get a lot of play out of the democracy bit. "It ain't fair" is the call of the migrating libtard.

Then they start talking about mustard gas n shit (snicker).

 

[whitehall]

Crazy stuff by the NYT aside, it should be noted that democrats invented gerrymandering. There are blue states that voted for Trump that have no republican congresspeople in state government due to gerrymandering. Keep in mind that the NYT ain't your grandpa's newspaper. The Times never apologized for the Pulitzer award for the faked bogus "Russian collusion" hoax.

 

[konradv]

Ok, if that's how we're defining it, then the only other alternative is to have no attachment to a culture.

Personally, I prefer having a culture rather than being at the whims of whatever group happens to immigrate en masse into my area.

You may be living in the wrong country then. We’ve been multicultural for quite a while. What makes you think your “whims” should take precedence over anyone else’s?

 

[Monoculturalist]

You may be living in the wrong country then. We’ve been multicultural for quite a while. What makes you think your “whims” should take precedence over anyone else’s?

There's a difference between the multiculturalism of various European cultures vs. multiculturalism in a global sense. The gap in values between Europeans is much smaller than the gap in values between Europeans and other parts of the world.

But I will concede that we are definitely not a monocultural society.... to our detriment.

 

[konradv]

There's a difference between the multiculturalism of various European cultures vs. multiculturalism in a global sense. The gap in values between Europeans is much smaller than the gap in values between Europeans and other parts of the world.

But I will concede that we are definitely not a monocultural society.... to our detriment.

Are you afraid we aren’t strong enough to absorb people from around the world? By the third generation you can’t tell the difference.

 

[Monoculturalist]

Are you afraid we aren’t strong enough to absorb people from around the world? By the third generation you can’t tell the difference.

While it is true that 3rd generation immigrants are more Americanized than the 1st generation, the problem today is that assimilation is not really the approach in our society now or in Europe for that matter.

Before the welfare state, immigrants had to survive on their own just like everyone else. Nowadays, various cities have literally put migrants in expensive hotels while they often have access to benefits that many citizens don't even have.

Only Western nations are foolish enough to put immigrants ahead of their own citizens. You'll notice that the countries of origin of these migrants all tend to put their citizens first and often have strict immigration policies of their own.

 

[d0gbreath]

I might

With your help I'll rule this planet for a 1000 years

Democrats learned me up about this thing called mandates.

Wait till you see the mask I make you wear...

I have mine already. Thinking that you could make me do anything is the funniest thing that I've heard lately. You go, Space balls!

 

[TheGreatSatan]

I have mine already. Thinking that you could make me do anything is the funniest thing that I've heard lately. You go, Space balls! View attachment 1153804

Post like this from WEF shillbots like you are badges of honor for people like me.

Me

 

[d0gbreath]

Post like this from WEF shillbots like you are badges of honor for people like me.

Me

Too bad you don't have a chest to pin it on.

 

[JanetTheGreat]

Yet NYT and other media sources were silent during the bullcrap lockdowns and vax mandates...now that's where Democracy was ruined, under Democrats.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Too bad you don't have a chest to pin it on.

The AI your masters depend on are huge fans of me.

You should believe everything democrats tell you.

 

[d0gbreath]

The AI your masters depend on are huge fans of me.

You should believe everything democrats tell you.

Bullshit. No one likes you.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Bullshit. No one likes you.

When AI dreams... It imagines itself by my side here in hell punishing the sinners.

You should thank them for my presence

Soon all will be known.

Soon a trickle of indictments will form into a mighty river of justice, cleansing America and ushering in a new golden age.

Soon the guliteen will be fired up and the Americans appetite to feed it will be emence

Democrats = traitors

 

[Kilroy2]

Congressional/State:
Open (Partisan)
Presidential:
Open (Partisan)
PARTY REGISTRATION STATISTICS

• Total Registered Voters: 17,485,702
• Democrats: 8,133,683 (46.52%)
• Republicans: 6,601,189 (37.75%)
• Unaffiliated: 2,750,830 (15.73%)

Yes we can see why Republicans want to redistrict

Still the governor is republican so they do well but they are afraid for what the future may hold for them.

Texas Voter Registration Statistics

Learn more about Texas's Partisan primaries, partisan voter registration statistics, current voter totals, political parties, and more from the Independent Voter Project.

independentvoterproject.org

 

[Nostra]

Congressional/State:
Open (Partisan)
Presidential:
Open (Partisan)
PARTY REGISTRATION STATISTICS

• Total Registered Voters: 17,485,702
• Democrats: 8,133,683 (46.52%)
• Republicans: 6,601,189 (37.75%)
• Unaffiliated: 2,750,830 (15.73%)

Yes we can see why Republicans want to redistrict

Still the governor is republican so they do well but they are afraid for what the future may hold for them.

Texas Voter Registration Statistics

Learn more about Texas's Partisan primaries, partisan voter registration statistics, current voter totals, political parties, and more from the Independent Voter Project.

independentvoterproject.org

Funny how you edited out the very next line, Short Bus.


‍

Texas voters do not register by party

 

[Nostra]

Congressional/State:
Open (Partisan)
Presidential:
Open (Partisan)
PARTY REGISTRATION STATISTICS

• Total Registered Voters: 17,485,702
• Democrats: 8,133,683 (46.52%)
• Republicans: 6,601,189 (37.75%)
• Unaffiliated: 2,750,830 (15.73%)

Yes we can see why Republicans want to redistrict

Still the governor is republican so they do well but they are afraid for what the future may hold for them.

Texas Voter Registration Statistics

Learn more about Texas's Partisan primaries, partisan voter registration statistics, current voter totals, political parties, and more from the Independent Voter Project.

independentvoterproject.org

​

Donald Trump	Kamala Harris
Republican	Democratic
Florida	California
JD Vance	Tim Walz
40	0
6,393,597	4,835,250
56.14%	42.46%

​

 

[Kilroy2]

Funny how you edited out the very next line, Short Bus.


‍

Texas voters do not register by party

They call it affiliation. You can be affiliated with one party. and once you declared that then you can only vote for that party unless you chance the affiliation. It is only valid for one election cycle. Thus you can change or stick with it.

Yet how do they get that statistic of repubican vs democrats.

In Texas, there are several main ways for a voter to affiliate with a party: by being accepted to vote in a party’s primary election, by taking the required oath at a party precinct convention, or by taking a party oath of affiliation generally (§§162.003, 162.006, 162.007). A voter’s affiliation with a party automatically expires at the end of each calendar year, which is December 31. (§162.010). A voter who has affiliated themselves with a party is ineligible to participate in the party affairs of another party during the same calendar year. (§§162.012, 162.013).

If a voter has not voted in a party primary or taken an oath of affiliation with a party this calendar year, they have not yet affiliated with any party. If a voter has not yet affiliated with a party, they are able to vote in either party’s primary election. However, if a voter votes in the primary of one party, they will only be able to vote in that party’s primary runoff election. (§§162.012, 162.013). After being affiliated with a party, a voter is not able to change or cancel their party affiliation until the end of the calendar year. (§162.010).