NYT: Donald Trump is Unfit to Lead

Gee, Dud...if we were energy independent we wouldn't have to worry about what the Saudis do. Duh?
How ignorant are you about the oil market?

Just asking, so I can decide how much time I want to waste educating your dumb ass.
 
In what way?
Every measurable way.


Americans had more money, their dollar went further, their border was secure, they had less Covid deaths, they weren’t held in contempt of England, they didn’t have 4.1 UE

Then the world was better
 
1ptn2y4806sa1.jpg
How ironic is that! With Trump, >>>oil independence. Under Biden foreign interference, them telling Biden to kiss their ass, not only would they pump more, they pumped less. That is the difference between Trump gas @ $1.67 a gal. and Biden's $3.60+ and a drained oil reserve.
 
Gee, Dud...if we were energy independent we wouldn't have to worry about what the Saudis do. Duh?
our domestic production is with the light-sweet type of crude oil, but too much of our refining capacity is sour/heavy type.

This means we export alot of that light-sweet type, and then import the sour/heavy type of crude.

Unless there is a balance of the production type of oil, with the type the refineries take, then there will always be this buying & selling of oil with other countries. It would be a colossal waste of money to change the refineries. Its much better to use less oil overall by switching to other energy types, and meet climate goals.
 
our domestic production is with the light-sweet type of crude oil, but too much of our refining capacity is sour/heavy type.

This means we export alot of that light-sweet type, and then import the sour/heavy type of crude.

Unless there is a balance of the production type of oil, with the type the refineries take, then there will always be this buying & selling of oil with other countries. It would be a colossal waste of money to change the refineries. Its much better to use less oil overall by switching to other energy types, and meet climate goals.
Or we could build several refineries to refine the oil. Oh wait...that would make sense! Don't want to do THAT!!! (eye roll)
 
our domestic production is with the light-sweet type of crude oil, but too much of our refining capacity is sour/heavy type.

This means we export alot of that light-sweet type, and then import the sour/heavy type of crude.

Unless there is a balance of the production type of oil, with the type the refineries take, then there will always be this buying & selling of oil with other countries. It would be a colossal waste of money to change the refineries. Its much better to use less oil overall by switching to other energy types, and meet climate goals.
Ah yes...let's "meet" climate goals! Let's handicap our economy while China increases it's pollution levels for the next decade! Who was stupid enough to sign onto THAT accord, Dud?
 
capitalism doesnt want to waste money, when it can profit by buying and selling on the world market.
The reason that refinery's aren't being built in the US has nothing to do with their being profitable, Dud...they're not being built because every time one is proposed it's met with unending law suits from the left to hold up construction. There has only been one built in the last 50 years.
 
15th post
your pic is fake...mine is not.....good try however....i dont approve of what clinton did but at least she was an adult
Those were "adults" that Clinton was with on Epstein's island? That makes it OK?
That picture was on the wall of Epstein's house on that island. Why do you think that is, Strolling?
 
Newspapers agree with many of us, that both duopoly candidates are unfit for the post proposed.
 
Back
Top Bottom