Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,120
- 190
- Banned
- #21
I think you just hate Americans. And you're selfish. And you sound like a hillbilly.Some people are paid so little that they get food stamps. Or have to live in a camper... I think that a country like ours should share the riches a little more. Trickle down doesn't work all that well. But you\re ok so you don't care about others. GO TRUMP!It wouldn't be that much of a difference. But you don't mind being served by people who can't make a living. I bet you shop at Walmart as well.It'll cull the places that needed slave wages to exist. No biggie, the strong will survive.
So basically fuck the people who want a nice $40 meal, and those paying $150 for a meal are just fine.
What a fucking bougie douche you are.
The wait staff usually does just fine. For some of them it's a part time job, for some a second job.
My father did side work growing up. Where is it written that you only need 1 job to provide a sustainable life, especially if you are low skilled or just starting out?
This tries to make low end jobs like professions, something you can do for a career, and they were never meant for that.
it's a way of coddling people to keep them needy on progressives, and not encouraging them to better themselves.
Of course a snitty bougie freak like you is OK with that.
They are paid so little because their skills set isn't worth much. They can improve their skill set and move on to a better paying position.
By subsidizing them at a low skill level, you remove the incentive to increase skill.
It's you ilk that don't care about them, because you want to coddle them and incentivize them staying at subsistence level.
And in actuality, when you raise pay to a point where a person of low skill no longer provides enough labor to justify the cost, either the business will fire them and hire a more skilled person, or eliminate their position via increasing the workload of others, or automation.