NY Times Admits: Anchor Babies Benefit Hugely from Taxpayer-Funded Welfare

[Etymology gaslight]

Of course.

Of course,
Then why the grandfather clause

Nope.

The 14th already says who....ALL PERSONS born on our soil...but it also gives exceptions....only those persons subject to our jurisdiction...

So lets examine who the exceptions are, who are not subject to our jurisdiction when they are on US Soil....

- Foreign diplomats and Ambassadors and their family members with them, along with any foreign Royalty themselves are not under or subjects to our jurisdiction. Under International and US Law, these people above, have what is legally called, Diplomatic Immunity, and are not under our govt jurisdiction, if they commit a crime, they are not held or tried in the US, they are not under our jurisdiction to prosecute them...they are whisked up and returned to their foreign country. The foreign country may be able to prosecute them for any egregious crime committed.

-another group of people who are not under our govt jurisdiction, are wartime foreign enemy soldiers and family who even may be living on our soil...that is self explanatory...they are subject and under command by their foreign govt, not our govt and laws.

This would not be common today.

- at the time, native American Indians on a reservation were not subject to our laws and governing, but under the jurisdiction of tribal leadership, under a treaty or agreement signed with them.

Everyone else were subject to the laws within their state and federal governments.

Visitors, tourists, legal immigrants, illegal immigrants, citizens by birth or naturalized, British, French, or Spanish resident's child born here, etc etc etc....were all under US jurisdiction and had to and have to, answer to our laws...abide by them or if they break them, they can be charged and tried for the crimes by our govt in a court of law, given all legal protections like due process, Habeas Corpus, Miranda rights etc. that citizens get.

Jus soli
Wong Kim Ark
Happersett I've heard all the arguments.
I'm still a long time birther.

 

[BS Filter]

Same reason you do I suppose.

That post reveals your dishonesty.

 

[pknopp]

That post reveals your dishonesty.

Just a reply in kind.

 

[BS Filter]

Just a reply in kind.

A reply that you can't explain. Go ahead and tell us how I support illegal immigration.

 

[pknopp]

A reply that you can't explain. Go ahead and tell us how I support illegal immigration.

The same way I do.

 

[BS Filter]

The same way I do.

Back on ignore for you. Pitiful

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Just a reply in kind.

Of course,
Then why the grandfather clause

Jus soli
Wong Kim Ark
Happersett I've heard all the arguments.
I'm still a long time birther.

Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874)

Minor v. Happersett

supreme.justia.com

The problem with Wong Kim Ark
is that he never ran for president.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark

www.law.cornell.edu

The Supreme Court has not defined natural born citizen if you don't believe me.

Clarence Thomas said that the Supreme Court is avoiding the issue.

If you like I can find the video of him saying that.

I remember doing battle with the Obots on various forums predicated Obama's entire NBcitizenship
on his mother being natural born
The the one parent rule is also made up.
his father of course was a British subject
these are the facts of the case.

I was always less interested in that than I am in this.

It is coming around again and the DNA will be the final definitive answer.

With genetic genealogy
(Golden State killer)
We don't even need a Marlboro Red from Obama.

I have made friends with the Sabud family in Jakarta.

Far from over
I think the American people deserve the truth.

I'm going to do everything in my power to make that happen.

I may get killed doing it (many people have)
But I'm still doing it.

I'm hoping I'm high profile enough when I get to see it come to fruition.

But Andrew Breitbart was high profile.
Larry Sinclair
And on and on and on.

No lie can live forever
Martin Luther King.

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[AZrailwhale]

We gladly subsidize the very wealthy who move the jobs they are supposed to be creating for Amercans out of the country and yet we get steady bitching from idiots about somebody getting the pennies that go out for welfare. And illegals don't get it, even though they contribute 100 billion in taxes to this country.

Who do you think was funding the NGOs that you claim to have run? The rich make large donations to them to get tax benefits.