NY Post turns against Trump

[konradv]

Apparently, even Trump's staunchest supporters are starting to see the light.

The Post says: Give it up, Mr. President — for your sake and the nation’s

 

[Anomalism]

They are center-right.

 

[toobfreak]

Apparently, even Trump's staunchest supporters are starting to see the light.

The Post says: Give it up, Mr. President — for your sake and the nation’s

Gee, that's really turning against Trump!

 

[konradv]

They are center-right...

...and calling Trump an anarchist!
"If you insist on spending your final days in office threatening to burn it all down, that will be how you are remembered. Not as a revolutionary, but as the anarchist holding the match."

 

[Anomalism]

...and calling Trump an anarchist!
"If you insist on spending your final days in office threatening to burn it all down, that will be how you are remembered. Not as a revolutionary, but as the anarchist holding the match."

I suppose whether a person is a revolutionary or an anarchist can be pretty subjective.

 

[postman]

Apparently, even Trump's staunchest supporters are starting to see the light.

The Post says: Give it up, Mr. President — for your sake and the nation’s

They still have to sell newspapers after Trump leaves.

 

[Crepitus]

Apparently, even Trump's staunchest supporters are starting to see the light.

The Post says: Give it up, Mr. President — for your sake and the nation’s

Eventually all but a few internet whack-jobs will acknowledge reality.

 

[two_iron]

They are center-right...

...and calling Trump an anarchist!
"If you insist on spending your final days in office threatening to burn it all down, that will be how you are remembered. Not as a revolutionary, but as the anarchist holding the match."

When did he threaten to burn it all down? I missed that.

The Post has written scathing shit about Trump for years. They're relatively neutral.

We get it. When they call Trump an anarchist you like it..... when they publish material about Hunted raping Chinese children, you don't like. Your selective outrage is pathetic.

 

[Auld Phart]

I suppose whether a person is a revolutionary or an anarchist can be pretty subjective.

True.

it depended on which side of the Atlantic you were, as to whether Paul Revere was a terrorist or a patriot.

 

[postman]

I suppose whether a person is a revolutionary or an anarchist can be pretty subjective.

Not really. A revolutionary leaves the place BETTER than where he found it.

An anarchist leave it WORSE than where he found it.

 

[Anomalism]

Not really. A revolutionary leaves the place BETTER than where he found it.

Not always.

 

[postman]

We get it. When they call Trump an anarchist you like it..... when they publish material about Hunted raping Chinese children, you don't like. Your selective outrage is pathetic.

I didn't realize we elected HUNTER Biden as the 46th president.

So you complain when they report about President Trump, but not put the other candidates relatives in the headlines.

 

[postman]

True.

it depended on which side of the Atlantic you were, as to whether Paul Revere was a terrorist or a patriot.

Or Benedict Arnold.

 

[Anomalism]

An anarchist leave it WORSE than where he found it.

...not always.

 

[Auld Phart]

I suppose whether a person is a revolutionary or an anarchist can be pretty subjective.

Not really. A revolutionary leaves the place BETTER than where he found it.

An anarchist leave it WORSE than where he found it.

Did the Boston Tea Partiers leave Boston Harbor in in better or worse shape?

 

[postman]

Not really. A revolutionary leaves the place BETTER than where he found it.

An anarchist leave it WORSE than where he found it.

Did the Boston Tea Partiers leave Boston Harbor in in better or worse shape?

It's a macro not a micro analysis. You can point to the many botched battles in WWII, but it's success or failure is measured by the overall war, and not by individual battle.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Apparently, even Trump's staunchest supporters are starting to see the light.

The Post says: Give it up, Mr. President — for your sake and the nation’s

Problem is Trump doesn't care about the nation.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

They are center-right...

...and calling Trump an anarchist!
"If you insist on spending your final days in office threatening to burn it all down, that will be how you are remembered. Not as a revolutionary, but as the anarchist holding the match."

When did he threaten to burn it all down? I missed that.

The Post has written scathing shit about Trump for years. They're relatively neutral.

We get it. When they call Trump an anarchist you like it..... when they publish material about Hunted raping Chinese children, you don't like. Your selective outrage is pathetic.

He's currently doing it.

 

[Anomalism]

Problem is Trump doesn't care about the nation.

He cares about his reputation.

 

[Mac1958]

Apparently, even Trump's staunchest supporters are starting to see the light.

The Post says: Give it up, Mr. President — for your sake and the nation’s

Gee, that's really turning against Trump!

Yes. And it's good to see.