why I should care if Hunter was working for Burisma.
he obviously wasn't working for Burisma and had no qualifications to do so and was a drug addict. Joe was working for Burisma. This is covered under "foreign corrupt practices act"
And THAT is an outright fabrication, with zero zip nada, proof.
Actually, Adam Schiff's little conspiracy with Nancy and the girls to impeach President Trump on Hillary's lying dossier named and blamed on a British spy and Russia were outright fabrications sans any semblance of probity, doll.
Hunter Biden is going down with both hands grasping papa Joe's lying, extorting ankles.
The impeachment, was about Trump, abusing his power, in the Ukraine, by withholding military aid, (passed by congress for the Ukraine to defend themselves from further Russian encroachment in to Ukraine), until the President of Ukraine would go on CNN and make an announcement that he began an investigation in to Hunter and Joe Biden.
Except he didn't. And Hunter's emails show that Trump was absolutely right to suggest Ukraine look into all this corruption, as our intelligence agencies should have been. CBS News just confirmed that the FBI does have Hunter's laptop, just like the DE shop owner said they did, and the FBI confirms that it's Hunter's laptop, not the product of Russian disinformation like Schiff and the other 50 psychopathic liars claimed.
The Constitution puts bribery in the same phrase as treason for obvious reasons. Biden doesn't acquire immunity simply because he enters presidential primaries.
What is detailed in Hunter's emails are terrible crimes, and Hunter isn't the mastermind, he is nothing more than the Biden Family Crime Boss, Joe Biden's Mule, and what Hunter describes is a system that dates back to when Biden became chair of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Hunter needs help, he has a very serious drug problem and his easy access to $Millions is going to kill him. He needs to get away from his exploitive father and into recovery. Hopefully sobriety and a 90 day chip are in his future and very very quickly.
Whether he realized it or not, dropping that laptop off was a cry for help. And he may need it very very quickly. How his Dad could continue to exploit him like this when he is clearly spiraling, didn't Obama say that "at some point you have made enough?" Hasn't Joe Biden, at this point, stolen enough, been bribed enough?
Oh silly naive one....
We actually have rules and laws and procedures that govern a situation with an American allegedly committing crime overseas....
Oh silly naïve one, cite the law that states that the President is not free to give his opinion in a conversation with a fellow President. No such law exists, and if it did, it would be unconstitutional.
You think Congress can pass a law that restricts what the President may say to a foreign leader? Cite the Constitutional provision that empowers Congress to do that.
... his personal campaign lawyer named Giuliani...
The President is free to use who he wishes as his envoy. Giuliani is one of the most effective prosecutors our nation has ever produced.
... If the laptop emails and documents proved Trump was right, in his impeachment, THEN WHY DIDN'T TRUMP USE IT in his defense at the impeachment trial?...
He didn't have it.
.... Giuliani had it for months before the impeachment...
I have not heard that. I appreciate your response, while we certainly don't agree, you always stick to the facts and I appreciate that. On this final point, please support this claim.
Take care,
Zorro
Let me see if I can find where I read it, and get you a link....
If memory serves MacIssac said he had the computer about 3 months, before having a friend contact Giuliani's lawyer, to give it to him.... 3 months would have been around July 20, 2019.... if it took a month or two in the least, to actually reach him and give it to him, that would be August or September 2019....months before the impeachment trial.
Trump was impeached around December 18, 2019 and the impeachment trial was a month later, January 16, 2020 thru Feb 5, 2020.
The FBI subpoena of the laptop was dated December 9, 2019....and it would take at least a month to get enough info, for the FBI to get a court approved subpoena with probable cause.... my complete guess from reading a bunch of articles is that Devon Archer, Hunter' s partner was under investigation or already charged with money laundering, and the FBI got the subpoena ....for their fraud case against Devon.....and some other guy who was a partner.
You should try to remember these names -
Tony Bobulinski
James Gilliar
Kenes Ralishev
Karim Rakakhstan
Valerie Owens
Mykola Zlochevsky
Devan Archer
Hunter Biden
Joe Biden
The only one that is important is JOE BIDEN.
I'm still looking for the link for what I had read.... everything I've found so far says Bannon and Giuliani, got it the same time period as the FBI but I could swear the guy said he had his friend get it to Giuliani earlier....
That may be, and if you can dig that up, I'm sure you will post it. My understanding is that he promptly turned it over to the FBI, because it frightened him, it contained material that clearly contradicted the Biden defense in the Impeachment case, and between the drug and underage sex stuff, clearly detailed felonies. He thought he might end up dead.
Then after he turned it over the FBI it was only after complete silence and a great deal of time elapsed, that he began to fear that it was simply going to be buried, and that is when he reached out to Rudy.
... How did the FBI even get a subpoena for the laptop, unless they knew the laptop was at the Mac Shop? And what criminal investigation were they working on before they subpoenaed the laptop, to even get the subpoena? ...
That's a great question and it brings up some other points. The FBI cannot compel evidence production, for that, they need a US Attorney who convenes a Grand Jury, and it is they that have that power, though once the subpoena is in hand, the FBI can take it from there. That is how we knew early on that the Hillary Clinton Email "Investigation" was a farce, there was no Grand Jury and no prosecutor, and so no evidence was compelled. Instead Comey made deals with Mills and others, to obtain laptops and so forth, they put restrictions on how it could be used, and added stipulations that after production the material could only be held for a certain period of time and then it was all to be destroyed. By the time Comey and the Clintons were done with this farce, there was no way anyone could retrace their steps and establish that crimes had been committed.
In this case, a US Attorney for the Baltimore Field office obtained the Subpoena with the following case number: 272D-BA-3065729 on the receipt for the hard drive.
272 refers to 'Money Laundering, Unknown SUA [Specified Unlawful Activity] – White Collar Crime Program.' "D" indicates that's international. The 'BA' in the file number indicates the case was opened by the FBI’s Baltimore field office.
... And, why would Rudy silently hold on to it for 11 months if all of these alleged crimes of underage sex was on it?...
I think he got it much more recently than that. As for the "underage sex" thing, I'm no sure about that. I read some of the texts and emails that are supposed to support that, and I was able to come up with some less damaging possibilities. The following is just by inference, but, it fits with what was provided as evidence.
I think the 14 year old girl described is someone that Hunter acted inappropriately around, as in walking around naked in front of her, face-timing sexual encounters with others in her presence, but not necessarily that this involved this girl, who I think is his niece. It was his sister in law (and lover) who lodged the complaint, Joe Biden knew her name, but the concern wasn't that Hunter involved her in his activity, but that it produced what the email/text described as a "hostile atmosphere". I think an "inappropriate sexually charged atmosphere" would probably be more accurate, with the remedy not having the daughter alone with Hunter as he clearly was not in a place where that was appropriate given his lifestyle. I hope that's all there is to it. The kiddie porn could be a moral weakness of Hunter's and it could be that these two different issues are being improperly mashed together with the wrong conclusions drawn. I hope so. I have not viewed the photos and videos, nor do I want to.
... Just an FYI, the FBI is limited to what they are allowed to view on the laptop..... They can only review emails related to the subpoena, by law. So, as example, if the subpoena was for fraud, they can only search emails that could be related to fraud.... not the sex, drugs, and rock n roll pictures... is my understanding of the law and our right to privacy...
That would make sense. One of the warrants or subpoenas was signed by the US attorney that specializes in Child Porn, so, they may have investigated that, and hopefully, eliminated it.
If those emails are authentic, and the Biden's won't cooperate with investigators, a Special Counsel may be needed.
