Nunes' Dud Memo may have strengthened Mueller's Quest

[Fort Fun Indiana]

why were the Dumbocrats shitting themselves over just the thought of it being released?

Because they know people are stupid and will look at it just how trump's PR team wants them to look at it. As evidenced by one visit to this message board. Dude, that was kind of a softball question. I think you could have figured that one out.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

so you think a good argument in a debate is a silly comeback?

So you think making a claim then posting a link you never read and don't understand is an argument?

Or this? You: "you guys always can find some liberal source that is on the payroll willing to debunk every thing that we discover"

Haha... argument? Get out of here... you aren't making any arguments. you freely and gleefully dismiss any argument, fact or evidence that doesn't support your preconceptions. You are not arguing or debating, you are self-soothing. You are changing the topic in a tactic called, "whataboutism". Whenever your nonsense fades into obscurity , it's always the "liberal machine, covering it up or dismissing it". No sir, it's never because the ideas you are peddling are ridiculous. Admitting that would be like owning your bullshit. That's for big kids.

 

[Faun]

Liar.

Trump administration holds off on new Russia sanctions, despite law

But that’s not the point. The point is that it was legal for Obama to negotiate with Putin. Whereas if Tr ump did while Obama was president, that’s illegal.

That is quite different from selling them uranium facilities.

Who sold them Uranium facilities?

The sale by the owner was approved by the Obama administration, spearheaded by the State Department, enabled by Hillary Clinton. Clinton received hundreds of millions of dollars (via the Clinton Crime Family Foundation) from Russian companies affiliated with the deal.

Clinton’s role in the Uranium One sale, and the link to the Clinton Foundation, first became an issue in 2015, when news organizations received advance copies of the book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at a conservative think tank.

On April 23, 2015, the New York Times wrote about the uranium issue, saying the paper had “built upon” Schweizer’s information.

The Times detailed how the Clinton Foundation had received millions in donations from investors in Uranium One.

The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company.

The Times also wrote that Bill Clinton spoke at a conference in Moscow on June 29, 2010 — which was after the Rosatom-Uranium One merger was announced in June 2010, but before it was approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States in October 2010. The Russian-based Renaissance Capital Group organized the conference and paid Clinton $500,000.

Renaissance Capital has “ties to the Kremlin” and its analysts “talked up Uranium One’s stock, assigning it a ‘buy’ rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was ‘the best play’ in the uranium markets,” the Times wrote.

But there is no evidence that the donations or the speaking fee had any influence on the approvals granted by the NRC or the Committee on Foreign Investments.

Great, thanks for confirming neither Obama nor Hillary sold anyone any uranium facilities. That's why it made no sense when you said, "that is quite different from selling them uranium facilities."

Nope.....uranium mining stakes. Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Nice try though.

LOLOL

Next time, try reading your own link...

Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown.​

Which wouldn't make sense to pay off the Clinton's for that deal to go through ... Hillary didn't vote on it and even if she had, 8 other approvals were required for the deal to go through.

Then there's the problem of your fellow yahoo who said they sold a uranium utility. That's not possible since they didn't own one to sell.

 

[Faun]

Of course we know why he fired Comey — he said so himself.

This is what Trump said HIMSELF.....

"I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job ……I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off."

I've already asked you for a CREDIBLE link to that claim. You gave me four shithole liberal shills. Either post a credible link...or a VIDEO. I will respond to either.

“And in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, ‘You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story,’ ”

Thanks, but the video does not prove that Trump fired Comey because of the Russia collusion investigation. That is the conclusion drawn by the NYT.

I heard him say "

My link doesn't go to the NYT and the video plays his own words about stopping the investigation.

 

[P@triot]

why were the Dumbocrats shitting themselves over just the thought of it being released?

Because they know people are stupid and will look at it just how trump's PR team wants them to look at it.

So assuming that idiotic excuse is true - that justifies the Dumbocrats egregiously lying to the American people and declaring that information which rightfully belongs to the American people should be hidden from them under the guise of “national security”?

Do you realize how stupid you sound now? Do you realize how desperate you sound? Do you realize literally everyone here isn’t laughing at you for being an absurd partisan hack?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So assuming that idiotic excuse is true

Idiotic? Wha? It's brilliant political maneuvering. Much respect from me for it. Trust me, they aren't playing to the intellectuals, my man. They're playing to you.

 

[P@triot]

So assuming that idiotic excuse is true

Idiotic? Wha? It's brilliant political maneuvering. Much respect from me for it. Trust me, they aren't playing to the intellectuals, my man. They're playing to you.

You didn’t answer the question. You ran from it and desperately attempted to change the focus (because the question has you shitting yourself just like the Dumbocrats in Washington).

The Dumbocrats don’t get to decide what information the American people see because the Dumbocrats fear President Trump’s “PR Team”. And what does it say about what the Dumbocrats have to offer the American people if President Trump’s “PR Team” causes them to hide information from the people, lie to us, and engage in criminal acts?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

that justifies the Dumbocrats egregiously lying to the American people and declaring that information which rightfully belongs to the American people should be hidden from them under the guise of “national security”?

I didn't answer the question, because it is a loaded question. ratuional people don't respond to loaded questions, as they are cheap, used car salesman tricks designed to thenimply that you agreed with the assumptions of the loaded question.

You are an adult, i shouldn't have to explain this to you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Dumbocrats don’t get to decide what information the American people see

No shit... the committees, then the white house, then the Congress decide. If you think that any of them are going to just start dumping FISA info, you are out of your damn mind. Get a grip, dude.

 

[P@triot]

Trust me, they aren't playing to the intellectuals, my man. They're playing to you.

Says the tool who supports all of the facts and information being hidden from the American people. You know who else attempts to control information? North Korea. China. Russia. Iran. In other words, all of the nations that the Dumbocrats want the U.S. to be like.

 

[P@triot]

that justifies the Dumbocrats egregiously lying to the American people and declaring that information which rightfully belongs to the American people should be hidden from them under the guise of “national security”?

I didn't answer the question, because it is a loaded question.

You’re right - it is “loaded” with facts. You painted yourself into a corner with your immature and idiotic excuse.

 

[P@triot]

You are an adult, i shouldn't have to explain this to you.

You clearly aren’t. Anyone who attempts to defend criminal behavior and corrupt government is an immature partisan hack.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Says the tool who supports all of the facts and information being hidden from the American people.

Not so at all... open the books, as far as I am concerned. You really need to settle down.

 

[P@triot]

The Dumbocrats don’t get to decide what information the American people see

No shit... the committees, then the white house, then the Congress decide. If you think that any of them are going to just start dumping FISA info, you are out of your damn mind. Get a grip, dude.

The memo had no “FISA info”. None. In fact, it was released without a single redaction because it had absolutely nothing to do with national security. Would you like to try again?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The memo had no “FISA info”. None.

I didn't say or imply that it did. I was responding to your tantrum, which seems to be centered on classified info being withheld,.. In this case, specifically, info on obtaining the FISA warrant.

 

[P@triot]

Says the tool who supports all of the facts and information being hidden from the American people.

Not so at all... open the books, as far as I am concerned. You really need to settle down.

You really need to stop making absurd excuses like “it’s ok to hide information from the American people if you are afraid of President Trump’s PR team”.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

“it’s ok to hide information

I never said that, though. You are hearing voices, dude. To what information are you referring?

 

[P@triot]

The memo had no “FISA info”. None.

I didn't say or imply that it did.

Uh...that’s exactly what you just did in your previous post.

If you think that any of them are going to just start dumping FISA info, you are out of your damn mind.

A bit confused there, chief?

 

[P@triot]

“it’s ok to hide information

I never said that, though. You are hearing voices, dude. To what information are you referring?

That’s exactly what you said. You claimed that the Dumbocrats attempted to prevent the reslease of the memo out of fear of Trump’s PR team. You didn’t condemn it. You immediately made an excuse for it (and a horrible one at that).

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You claimed that the Dumbocrats attempted to prevent the reslease of the memo out of fear of Trump’s PR team.

Which is absolutely true. I don't care what they said, this is true. It's PR... political maneuvering... Welcome to America, son. When did you arrive?