NRA issues threatening video to intimidate opponents

[xyz]

Of course they are not. They were working to protect the rights of their members in Florida. Your irrational views aside, they are not a lobby for gun manufacturers. You just want to call the organization that to malign the NRA membership. I am a Progressive and would NEVER join a gun lobbying group.

You do realize that the NRA lobbies and pays off politicians in Washington, don't you? So yes, you are part of a gun lobby group.

No, I belong to a group that hires lobbyists to protect my rights.. They do not lobby for gun manufacturers,

Then why doesn't the NRA get upset over you not being able to buy a nuke? Plus all the other arms that you're not allowed to buy? Why does the NRA only care about guns?

Cannons are guns too, and they're definitely arms as well.

Cannons are ordinance, not arms. Look it up.

Under current law, "destructive devices".

 

[saveliberty]

NRA issues threatening video warning journalists 'your time is running out'

The NRA is becoming a terrorist organization that uses threats and intimidation to achieve their goals. This looks more like an ISIS video than an NRA video. When will journalist begin dying?

The Putin playbook is playing out before our very eyes..

So...you peed your pants over an ad for a new TV show. You should probably catch a Depends ad soon.

 

[Taz]

Don't Arab-Americans have a 2nd Amendment right to own one?

Multiple people including me keep asking you how they get nuclear material without affecting the rights of other citizens and you keep running and hiding

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

 

[hunarcy]

Multiple people including me keep asking you how they get nuclear material without affecting the rights of other citizens and you keep running and hiding

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

Where it says you can keep and bear arms, not ordinance.

 

[thanatos144]

Multiple people including me keep asking you how they get nuclear material without affecting the rights of other citizens and you keep running and hiding

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

Go buy one if you want it... What you can't afford it with your welfare check? Oh well to bad.

Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk

 

[Cecilie1200]

Multiple people including me keep asking you how they get nuclear material without affecting the rights of other citizens and you keep running and hiding

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

She is arguing that if you admit don't have the right to weapons grade plutonium then you have no right to any gun other than what government decides to allow you to have. Yes, it is that stupid.

Basically, rather than protecting our rights as we mistakenly believe, Taz is informing us that the second amendment is actually a power of government to decide what guns we may or may not have

Don't forget to mention where we're all supposed to be as stupid as Taz and believe there's some direct corollary between firearms and radioactive materials.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

It doesn't. The 2nd Amendment covers "Arms", which are personally held weapons. Bombs, missiles, cannons, etc. are "Ordnance" or "Artillery". Conflating the two is a tactic the anti-guns types use.

That is an interesting point, "arms" may have meant that in the 18th century.

It still does mean that. Boe is correct in distinguishing between "arms" and "ordnance".

 

[Cecilie1200]

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

It doesn't. The 2nd Amendment covers "Arms", which are personally held weapons. Bombs, missiles, cannons, etc. are "Ordnance" or "Artillery". Conflating the two is a tactic the anti-guns types use.

That is an interesting point, "arms" may have meant that in the 18th century.

Which is why you have a vehicle to amend the Constitution. 2/3, 2/3 and 3/4. There is no 5/9 in the Constitution

I don't think there is a reason to amend the Constitution.

However, I do find it interesting that certain states accept or don't accept bigger guns which have to be fired from a stand, so there is some leverage left up to the states to decide what is and what is not legal to own.

I'm guessing some states had more trouble with it than others.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Multiple people including me keep asking you how they get nuclear material without affecting the rights of other citizens and you keep running and hiding

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

Jesus H. Christ, this has devolved into the most ignorant, childish bunch of bullshit I've ever read. And since I've been on this board for years, that's a seriously high bar to clear.

 

[kaz]

Multiple people including me keep asking you how they get nuclear material without affecting the rights of other citizens and you keep running and hiding

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

I'm withdrawing your right to answer questions again since you're ignoring every question you're asked, but to repeat. Explain how you get nukes without affecting the rights of other citizens to not do things like die of radiation poisoning.

You threw out having a large enough farm as if that explained where you'd get the radioactive material and how you'd store and utilize it

 

[kaz]

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

Where it says you can keep and bear arms, not ordinance.

weapons are ordinance, I'm not sure what you mean exactly.

She only thinks she's clever because she's so incredibly not clever and she can't tell the difference

 

[kaz]

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

She is arguing that if you admit don't have the right to weapons grade plutonium then you have no right to any gun other than what government decides to allow you to have. Yes, it is that stupid.

Basically, rather than protecting our rights as we mistakenly believe, Taz is informing us that the second amendment is actually a power of government to decide what guns we may or may not have

Don't forget to mention where we're all supposed to be as stupid as Taz and believe there's some direct corollary between firearms and radioactive materials.

I don't see where the Constitution prohibits us from getting radioactive materials in an absolute sense. I just keep asking her how she's proposing to acquire, store and use themwithout violating the rights of other citizens to not die of radiation poisoning and she keeps running away and hiding clearly identifying herself as being full of shit on the whole discussion

 

[Cecilie1200]

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

She is arguing that if you admit don't have the right to weapons grade plutonium then you have no right to any gun other than what government decides to allow you to have. Yes, it is that stupid.

Basically, rather than protecting our rights as we mistakenly believe, Taz is informing us that the second amendment is actually a power of government to decide what guns we may or may not have

Don't forget to mention where we're all supposed to be as stupid as Taz and believe there's some direct corollary between firearms and radioactive materials.

I don't see where the Constitution prohibits us from getting radioactive materials in an absolute sense. I just keep asking her how she's proposing to acquire, store and use themwithout violating the rights of other citizens to not die of radiation poisoning and she keeps running away and hiding clearly identifying herself as being full of shit on the whole discussion

The Constitution doesn't mention radioactive materials, because they didn't exist. Radioactive materials are not "arms", though, so like everything else that isn't explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, they are free to be regulated by lesser statutes. And they are.

 

[Taz]

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

Where it says you can keep and bear arms, not ordinance.

So the Constitution allowed people to have guns to guard against a tyrannical government that outguns them?

 

[Taz]

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

Go buy one if you want it... What you can't afford it with your welfare check? Oh well to bad.

Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk

What about rich Arab-Americans, you're allowing them to also own a nuke in the US?

 

[gtopa1]

NRA issues threatening video warning journalists 'your time is running out'

The NRA is becoming a terrorist organization that uses threats and intimidation to achieve their goals. This looks more like an ISIS video than an NRA video. When will journalist begin dying?

The Putin playbook is playing out before our very eyes..

GO GIRL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go you GOOD THING!!!!

Greg

 

[Taz]

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

She is arguing that if you admit don't have the right to weapons grade plutonium then you have no right to any gun other than what government decides to allow you to have. Yes, it is that stupid.

Basically, rather than protecting our rights as we mistakenly believe, Taz is informing us that the second amendment is actually a power of government to decide what guns we may or may not have

Don't forget to mention where we're all supposed to be as stupid as Taz and believe there's some direct corollary between firearms and radioactive materials.

So our Constitution purposely leaves us outgunned by a tyrannical government?

 

[Taz]

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

It doesn't. The 2nd Amendment covers "Arms", which are personally held weapons. Bombs, missiles, cannons, etc. are "Ordnance" or "Artillery". Conflating the two is a tactic the anti-guns types use.

That is an interesting point, "arms" may have meant that in the 18th century.

It still does mean that. Boe is correct in distinguishing between "arms" and "ordnance".

Because it says that where in the Constitution? Please quote the exact passage.

 

[Taz]

Why should a suitcase nuke affect other people?

Because fissionable materials are dangerous simply by sitting and existing. They're radioactive. Therefore, their ownership is restricted.

I have a 2nd Amendment right to own one. And maybe I live on a farm far away from people.

where in the constitution does it say you have a right to weapons grade plutonium?

Where does it says that you can’t have a nuke?

I'm withdrawing your right to answer questions again since you're ignoring every question you're asked, but to repeat. Explain how you get nukes without affecting the rights of other citizens to not do things like die of radiation poisoning.

You threw out having a large enough farm as if that explained where you'd get the radioactive material and how you'd store and utilize it

The government manages to do it, then so can anyone else. Or do you consider yourself dumber than the government?

 

[Taz]

Ok, forget nukes for a sec (that seems too difficult for some of you to grasp), what about AA missiles? Can a self-professed patriotic American like Sunni claims to be buy anti-aircraft missiles? What about cluster bombs?