[
The problem is your knee-jerk reactions do not do anything for the actual reasons for the violence. You want to remove a tool, but ignore the problems that should be addressed and ignore the failings of the systems in place.
You also are willing to risk the lives of hundreds of thousands of law abiding citizens in your bid for governmental control of more and more of our lives.
Again, your argument would hold validity if no one had every successfully implmented gun control.
But every other industrialized nation has, every other industrialized nation reduced their murder rates after doing so.
[
The fact that you cannot stay on one topic shows both your ignorance and your inability to win the debate. That you can only stay with a topic if you make off-the-wall connections and deny facts (simply because you don't like them) shows the lunacy of your side.
yes, yes, let it all out.... Poor baby.
[
And the fact that you insist that one of the amendments in the Bill of Rights was written to protect the rights of a government, and not the people, shows both ignorance and a willingness to toss away rights in a quest for some utopia that will never exist.
Right. Except that England and Australia have tossed away these "rights", they are just as free as we are and they have a fraction of our murder rate.
But, but, but Founding Fathers. LIke I give a **** about what they thought. If Thomas Jefferson let Sally Hemming pack heat, then I'd take him seriously.
[
That you think only your own questions need to be answered shows your personality and leaves you lacking.
I think that when people speculate about me, it means they usually don't have an argument.
I pride myself on how many people I've butthurt so bad they complain about me in their sig-lines.