Now Vance attacks Teachers who Don't have Kids

Well all are likely better off with teachers who actually have one of what they are teaching
Hard to be a pet trainer when you don’t have any.
 
Last edited:
/----/So? I went to a Catholic school where 75% of the nuns and 25% of the married lay teachers who had children. The lay teachers were by far more understanding than the nuns. Some of the nuns were caring and understanding, but others were just bad teachers with inflexible rules reinforced with brass rulers across the knuckles of students.
So, 75% of the nuns had children? Weird! That must have been one really different school!
 
I know right?
View attachment 1002865
90
nappy-ears-scaled.jpg


View attachment 1002866
Is there some relation for those photos and the thread topic?
 
/—-/ How do you say I don’t know what a lay teacher is without saying it?

Did you notice I highlighted the poor grammar that led to that conclusion?

Laying a teacher usually gets you in big trouble if you are a student. For 21 years. my wife laid a teacher all the time and never got in trouble.
 

Another video surfaces of Vance and children. This time teachers who don't have kids disturb him. The weirdness continues.​

JD Vance says teachers who don't have biological kids 'disorient and really disturb' him​


Not sure why he's making these exclusory pronouncements known... Definitely not a smart political move..... Alienating a pretty large segment of the population unless they figured they don't need them but in a race this tight you don't want to throw even one vote away.
 
Back
Top Bottom