ICE is far from the outlived classification, wont stop dumbass libs though, market be damnedyeah...green new deal and all ya voted forIf they dont get outlawedhavent seen a Tesla fire lately. Lot of em running around though I probably wouldnt buy one. Not enough charging infrastructure to be interested.Guess you havent been watching the news about electric cars.Even if the range is overstated. Drive a mile to work, car is parked in sun all day, no gas for me, if it works. Cordless car. Think Mitsubishi was working on an electric with solar on roof and hood but havent seen anything on it for awhile.
Aptera is back with a new EV it says doesn’t need charging - The Verge
Electric car batteries are catching fire and that could be a big turnoff to buyers - CNN
Electric car batteries that catch fire "COULD" be a big turnoff to buyers...Go figure......
I've always said the concept of charging stations and/or battery swap stations is wrongheaded. That's not the right approach. 80% (I believe that figure is still accurate) of all our driving is local --- commuting and everyday errands, easily within the reach of a typical battery car. So you use it that way. When the occasion comes that you actually have to go hundreds of miles, you use the traditional ICE car. Appropriate technology for the occasion.
Comparing ranges between ICE and EV is apples to oranges. Two different technologies for two different uses.
If what don't get outlawed? ICE cars?
The whole idea is that if local commuting was done with EVs that knocks out (up to) 80% of EV exhaust. If you knock out that much EV exhaust, then you no longer have the smog problem you used to have.
I didn't see a vote on that but whatever -- the fact remains, if some technology is no longer used because it's outlived its usefulness, then there's no point in "outlawing" it.
Did you in fact read ANYTHING I posted?