Now, the New York Times admits that reaching a proper valuation for Trump's buildings is a "guessing game."

30,000 square feet vs 11,000 square feet. That isn't even a valid "guess".
 
Yep, they said this. And their readers are too stupid to realize the duplicity. As well, the Times is too stupid to realize what they did here.



Yeah, they realized that this is how such valuations have worked since the day people could take out loans on their property. Perhaps some of the owners at the NYT are concerned they may end up on the radar one day.
 
Yep, they said this. And their readers are too stupid to realize the duplicity. As well, the Times is too stupid to realize what they did here.



Oh holy shit you're stupid!

They're talking about how difficult it is because he has valued them all over the place depending on whether he needed them lower for taxes of higher for collateral.

spongebob-squarepants-laugh.gif
 
Yeah, they realized that this is how such valuations have worked since the day people could take out loans on their property. Perhaps some of the owners at the NYT are concerned they may end up on the radar one day.

Nobody got a valuation based upon 30,000 sq ft when it was actually 11,000 sq ft.
 
Oh holy shit you're stupid!

They're talking about how difficult it is because he has valued them all over the place depending on whether he needed them lower for taxes of higher for collateral.

View attachment 922422
Excalibur is an idiot that the internet protects. Trumps bond was reduced, not the penalty. If he loses the appeal he very well may end up paying the 454 mil plus interest.
 
They're talking about how difficult it is because he has valued them all over the place depending on whether he needed them lower for taxes of higher for collateral.
Why should that make it "a guessing game" for experts to value the properties?

They are experts- they should be able to come up with their own valuations independent of any valuation from Trump.

That's kind of what they get paid for after all...
 

Now, the New York Times admits that reaching a proper valuation for Trump's buildings is a "guessing game."​

Bullshit. Put them up for auction, market value is immediately realised.
 
Excalibur is an idiot that the internet protects. Trumps bond was reduced, not the penalty. If he loses the appeal he very well may end up paying the 454 mil plus interest.
When he loses the appeal. His lawyers were so weak they really didn't leave much to appeal on.
 
Why should that make it "a guessing game" for experts to value the properties?

They are experts- they should be able to come up with their own valuations independent of any valuation from Trump.

That's kind of what they get paid for after all...
New york times are experts in property values?
 
When he loses the appeal. His lawyers were so weak they really didn't leave much to appeal on.
No moron, when he WINS the appeal. The appeals court judges have pretty much already said this is getting tossed. As have a bunch of previous judgements from Engomoron vs real estate developers. Your desperation and fear are obvious.
 
Excalibur is an idiot that the internet protects. Trumps bond was reduced, not the penalty. If he loses the appeal he very well may end up paying the 454 mil plus interest.

That's the voices in your head talking Swahili.
 
Yep, they said this. And their readers are too stupid to realize the duplicity. As well, the Times is too stupid to realize what they did here.



Many businesses have pulled out of NY since this. But, nothing is more important that getting the orange man.
 

Forum List

Back
Top