Now That It Has Been Proven Biden & His Family Took Millions From The CCP & Joe Is Compromised / Criminal...

Why are Democrats, the MSM, and snowflakes still defending him?







The Department of the Treasury and The CCP Bank both released Biden Family financial records proving the Bidens took millions / were paid millions from the CCP and did so for years.

There is no denying these documents were released and what they show.


The fact that Joe Biden is a COMPROMISED President after having received over $1 million dollars from the CCP is not even questionable any longer.

The fact that Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and 2 other Bidens received MILLIONS of dollars from the CCP is not even up for debate anymore.

The FACT that Joe Biden and his family engaged in Influence Peddling, potential classified Information peddling, Espionage, Conspiracy, Russian Money Laundering, negotiating and conducting foreign business deals illegally without being registered as a foreign agent, committing Perjury is undeniable without ignoring proven, reported, recorded, documented fact, irrefutable evidence, and reality ... despite the fact that the Democrats, MSM, and the US governmet's own corrupt criminally partisan Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of (In)Justice has and continues to protect the Bidens from indictment and prosrcution.

At this point everyone on the planet, even the most die-hard Biden defender and apologist, knows the Biden family has been for decades and continues to be corrupt, self-servimg / enriching, criminals and traitors.

So WHY, despite all of the undeniable proof, do snowflakes still so adamantly defend him and lie for him?

To make matters worse, Joe Biden is a dementia-ravaged, pathologically lying, embarrassing disgrace on the world stage. He, like Diane Feinstein, is literally incapable of carryong out his duties as President, even if he weren't the most comproised, criminal Presidrnt in the History of the United States.
None of that is evidence Joe Biden received any money from his son's business dealings.

So, what remains is private citizens doing business abroad. The allegation of 'influence peddling' is a vacuous allegation not supported by any facts.

But your fake outrage is noted, considering

Ivana got her Chinese trademarks accelerated while her pappy was negotiating with China, whereupon she profited millions?

Jared scored a $2,000,000,000 fund from Mohammed Bin Salman, you know, the dude who butchered WaPo journalist Jamal khashoggi, whereupon Jared got a $125,000,000 blood money management fee, one he would not have obtained but for his father-in-law being president?

Not to mention Hunter is a private citizen but Ivana and Jared were SENIOR WHITE HOUSE ADVISORS.
 
You're a special kind of stupid - try reafing entire threads before rushing to show your ignorance / stupidity.




No it doesn't.

According to tbe Democrats tou spend a decade violating the Constitution, breaking laws, trampling rights, manufacturing false scandals / crimes / evidence and throw shit at the wall in hopes it will stock.

If anyone exposes 'YOUR' own crime you order an UnConstitutional raid on your political opponent, have some local DA attempt to prosecute a federal crime whose statute of limitations has expired - one anout which the DOJ has already said, 'There is nothing to prosecute'.

Despite you knowing all this and knowing this little tactic of your is bullshit you still use it because it is all you have to defend your preferred political party / partisan criminals.

:itsok:
There is ZERO evidence of any wrongdoing by Joe Biden.

There are TONS of evidence against Trump.
 
None of that is evidence Joe Biden received any money from his son's business dealings.

So, what remains is private citizens doing business abroad. The allegation of 'influence peddling' is a vacuous allegation not supported by any facts.

But your fake outrage is noted, considering

Ivana got her Chinese trademarks accelerated while her pappy was negotiating with China, whereupon she profited millions?

Jared scored a $2,000,000,000 fund from Mohammed Bin Salman, you know, the dude who butchered WaPo journalist Jamal khashoggi, whereupon Jared got a $125,000,000 blood money management fee, one he would not have obtained but for his father-in-law being president?

Not to mention Hunter is a private citizen but Ivana and Jared were SENIOR WHITE HOUSE ADVISORS.
What business are they in?

Name a business for each of their two dozen shell LLCs.
 
Why are Democrats, the MSM, and snowflakes still defending him?







The Department of the Treasury and The CCP Bank both released Biden Family financial records proving the Bidens took millions / were paid millions from the CCP and did so for years.

There is no denying these documents were released and what they show.


The fact that Joe Biden is a COMPROMISED President after having received over $1 million dollars from the CCP is not even questionable any longer.

The fact that Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and 2 other Bidens received MILLIONS of dollars from the CCP is not even up for debate anymore.

The FACT that Joe Biden and his family engaged in Influence Peddling, potential classified Information peddling, Espionage, Conspiracy, Russian Money Laundering, negotiating and conducting foreign business deals illegally without being registered as a foreign agent, committing Perjury is undeniable without ignoring proven, reported, recorded, documented fact, irrefutable evidence, and reality ... despite the fact that the Democrats, MSM, and the US governmet's own corrupt criminally partisan Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of (In)Justice has and continues to protect the Bidens from indictment and prosrcution.

At this point everyone on the planet, even the most die-hard Biden defender and apologist, knows the Biden family has been for decades and continues to be corrupt, self-servimg / enriching, criminals and traitors.

So WHY, despite all of the undeniable proof, do snowflakes still so adamantly defend him and lie for him?

To make matters worse, Joe Biden is a dementia-ravaged, pathologically lying, embarrassing disgrace on the world stage. He, like Diane Feinstein, is literally incapable of carryong out his duties as President, even if he weren't the most comproised, criminal Presidrnt in the History of the United States.
Nothing regarding President Biden has been proven.

Zero
 
170 SARS against the Biden Crime Family Syndicate
SARs are not direct evidence, it says so right on the government website:
"The SAR itself is not direct evidence of a crime..."

In other words, without corroborative evidence, SARs prove NOTHING.
A 1023 documenting $5 million bribes for Crackhead and Tater while he was VP.
The 1023 form is NOT proof of squat, says so right on the FBI website of ex FBI members:

...the FD-1023 is the form our special agents use to record raw, unverified reporting from confidential human sources (CHSs). FD-1023s merely document that information; they do not reflect the conclusions of investigators based on a fuller context or understanding. Recording this information does not validate it, establish its credibility, or weigh it against other information known or developed by the FBI in our investigations.


Just like SARs, FD-1023s, Affidavits, and this type of soft evidence, such requires CORROBORATION. Without it, you have NOTHING.

I encounter this every day of the week, and I can only conclude that the right doesn't have a clue as to what constitutes hard evidence. Hearsay is evidence, but it is NOT 'hard' evidence. What is hard evidence? It's the kind of evidence that could convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. What you have provided will be shredded by prosecutors on cross examination.

No, IANAL, but I do think I'm right about this.

What you have provided warrants further inquiry, that's about it.
 
SARs are not direct evidence, it says so right on the government website:
"The SAR itself is not direct evidence of a crime..."

In other words, without corroborative evidence, SARs prove NOTHING.

The 1023 form is NOT proof of squat, says so right on the FBI website of ex FBI members:

...the FD-1023 is the form our special agents use to record raw, unverified reporting from confidential human sources (CHSs). FD-1023s merely document that information; they do not reflect the conclusions of investigators based on a fuller context or understanding. Recording this information does not validate it, establish its credibility, or weigh it against other information known or developed by the FBI in our investigations.


Just like SARs, FD-1023s, Affidavits, and this type of soft evidence, such requires CORROBORATION. Without it, you have NOTHING.

I encounter this every day of the week, and I can only conclude that the right doesn't have a clue as to what constitutes hard evidence. Hearsay is evidence, but it is NOT 'hard' evidence. What is hard evidence? It's the kind of evidence that could convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. What you have provided will be shredded by prosecutors on cross examination.

No, IANAL, but I do think I'm right about this.

What you have provided warrants further inquiry, that's about it.
Keep your head up your ass,, Rumpy. That’s where your leaders want it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top