For those that liked the doctor and plan they couldn't keep despite Obama's promise they could, I'd say it's up to them to make that determination. Why do you think you should get to make it on their behalf?
Anything where one group is forced to subsidize another is a disaster.
I don't agree with your cherry-picked definition of "disaster". Over 25 million people now have insurance (that they would not have had), because of the ACA.
More like you don't like it so you called it cherry picked.
Seems you didn't answer my question on why you think it's your place to determine for someone else what is and isn't a disaster. You don't get to make that determination for anyone but yourself.
How many of those 25 million are freeloaders because they get something where someone else is forced to offset the costs? Hate to break it to you but one group being forced to fund it for another group isn't something to be proud of.