BULLSHIT.
Seriously Sally...do you genuinely believe what you are saying here?
Gil Ronen's Fabricated Statistics About Oslo Rapists Being All Muslim | loonwatch.com
Either you are stating this to push Sunni's buttons
or
You genuinely believe it.
Which is it?
Do you believe the words of that HATE SITE you have used or the official government figures that show the true extent of the problem. Take it from someone who lives with this sort of thing every day if it wasn't true we would not have over 500 muslim men arrested for child rape alone. The muslims would not be looked on with hatred and fear by all the women in those places that have high numbers. They think they can demand that white women do as they want like in their own countries.
You need to learn what a "HATE SITE" is - it's a site that
promotes hate speech.
Hate speech is, outside the law,
communication that vilifies a person or a group based on discrimination against that person or group....
Southern Poverty Law Center keeps a good record of hate sites, this isn't one of them.
A "hate site" is not a hate site soley because it refutes your claims.
While Loonwatch is clearly a site with it's own bias, it fails to to meet the critera of being a "hate site". Nice try though.
Second, given what you stated - you clearly did not read the link.
The report shows that for all types of rape, except assault rape, European perpetrators are in the majority, and they are mostly Norwegian. Assault rapes covers only five identified unique person. These have all a foreign origin. The number is however, so low that it does not provide a basis for drawing conclusions with regard to country of origin. Two of them were very young (under 18) and two had severe psychiatric diagnoses and cannot be regarded as representative of their ethnic culture.
What's the best way of generating HATE? Accuse a group of raping another groups women and violating their children.
Where did the claim come from that most rapes in Norway are caused by Muslim men originate? This "90%"?
Pam Geller and Robert Spencer. Where did that lovely duo get their information? They were simply repeating a false claim that originated
with Pat Condell, of the of the English Defense League (EDL). Geller and Spencer were pretty cozy with the EDL until they became increasingly anti-semitic as well as anti-muslim.
From the link:
The claim that "all rapists in Oslo are immigrants" is based exclusively on the figures for "assault rape", i.e. rape aggravated by physical violence, a category that included only 6 of the 152 cases and 5 of the 131 identified individuals. All of those 5 individuals were indeed of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin. However, the police report adds that in other cases of assault rape, where the individual responsible was not identified and the police relied on the description provided by the victim, "8 of the perpetrators were African / dark-skinned appearance, 5 were Western / light / Nordic and 4 had an Asian appearance". Which falls some way short of substantiating the claim that all perpetrators of aggravated rape in Oslo are of non-western origin, never mind the assertion that "Muslim immigrants" are responsible for all rapes in the city.
The police report also points out that "it must be stressed that the strong over-representation of people from minority backgrounds for several types of rape can not be interpreted as meaning that foreign culture is a causal explanation of rape" and that "the statistical difference in criminal behaviour between ethnic groups disappears when controlling for socio-economic conditions". It concludes: "Gross generalisations that have given the impression that the rapists are only foreigners – and largely Muslim – prove inadequate and erroneous."
In other words, on the basis of their detailed factual analysis the Norwegian police draw exactly the opposite conclusion about rape in Oslo from that promoted in Pat Condell's latest anti-Muslim video rant. But then, when have facts ever been of any concern to racist bigots like Condell?
