Nope, GOPers aren't talking impeachment. Uhuh...

[Dot Com]

Really a couple of years ago Rush Limbaugh was the leader at least according to the left. I wish the left would pick one faux party leader and stick with it.

that would explain why the then RNC Chair apologized to him for calling him an entertainer you dolt blackhawk

RNC Chief Apologizes for Ripping Rush Limbaugh Fox News

WASHINGTON -- Two days after calling Rush Limbaugh a mere "entertainer" with an "incendiary" talk show, Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele apologized and acknowledged the radio commentator as a "national conservative leader."

Stop being a hack chickenhawk!!!

That was four years ago and it was Michael Steele not the current head of RNC moron good to see your up on current events.

nice backpedal shit stain. I nailed your dumb ass dead to rights. Stop "makin' stuff up" boi.

 

[BlackSand]

I'm not sure I can take anything WND has to offer, seriously. And, I still can't fathom people so heartless that they would deport young people who have lived here all their life, brought here not of their own volition and being sent to a place where they have never lived and may not have anyone they even know living there. How cruel is that?

It would be hard for the children to have "lived here all of the lives" ... If they were "brought here not of their own volition".

Not to mention that children of illegal immigrants currently residing here are not deported. In fact, the US Immigration Website indicates they are more interested in using the children as an excuse to let their law-breaking parents stay ...

"In many cases, when undocumented immigrants enter the US, they bring their families with them. When parents are discovered by immigration authorities and deported, this can create a family tragedy if the children are left behind. According to some experts, there are more than 5000 immigrant children in foster care because their parents were detained or deported due to lack of legal status in the US.

What happens to these children is troubling. In many cases, they remain in the foster system for years. In some cases, the parents’ custody rights expire, the children can be put up for adoption. For some children, the child welfare system is the end result. According to the advocacy group First Focus, the system is causing many problems, including lack of support for the children, and broken homes. The current system is also costing taxpayers money."

Link:
Children of Illegal Immigrants What Happens to Them US Immigration News

If you just want to make it so the law doesn't matter ... Then why cry about the children and not push measures to eliminate all immigration requirements ... First come first serve?

.

 

[blackhawk]

Really a couple of years ago Rush Limbaugh was the leader at least according to the left. I wish the left would pick one faux party leader and stick with it.

that would explain why the then RNC Chair apologized to him for calling him an entertainer you dolt blackhawk

RNC Chief Apologizes for Ripping Rush Limbaugh Fox News

WASHINGTON -- Two days after calling Rush Limbaugh a mere "entertainer" with an "incendiary" talk show, Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele apologized and acknowledged the radio commentator as a "national conservative leader."

Stop being a hack chickenhawk!!!

That was four years ago and it was Michael Steele not the current head of RNC moron good to see your up on current events.

nice backpedal shit stain. I nailed your dumb ass dead to rights. Stop "makin' stuff up" boi.

Read your own link dumb ass it's dated March 2009 and Steele referred to him as a national conservative leader emphasis on A conservative leader not the leader of the Republican party. Do yourself a favor and take a remedial reading course and you might emphasis on might look less stupid.

 

[auditor0007]

And, I still can't fathom people so heartless that they would deport young people who have lived here all their life, brought here not of their own volition and being sent to a place where they have never lived and may not have anyone they even know living there. How cruel is that?

Really? So what of the American kids? Do they get shoved to the back of the line, then? American kids don't have to bear the burden of being the offspring of illegal immigrants. Yes, these Hispanic kids have lived here all of their lives, but the only way to teach them anything is to send them back home with their parents. Actions have consequences, breaking laws have consequences. Their parents knew they were breaking the law, they never once thought it would destroy the future of their child(ren).

I feel sorry for them, I really do. No, they shouldn't be punished for the actions of their parents. But knowing kids, they probably grew up watching their parents violate the sovereignty of another nation by breaking its laws , mainly the immigration ones. The only way you teach them a healthy respect for the law is to send them back where they came from. Hey, it isn't their fault, it's their parents'.

We should deport every single illegal regardless of how they got here. Send them all a packing. Then watch our economy implode. Get ready for times worse than the Great Depression. 25% unemployment would be a good unemployment rate.

 

[Dot Com]

Thats what happened when Wall St & their Washington-based, water-carriers decided that housing bubbles and endless debt were the game of the day

 

[eagle1462010]

And, I still can't fathom people so heartless that they would deport young people who have lived here all their life, brought here not of their own volition and being sent to a place where they have never lived and may not have anyone they even know living there. How cruel is that?

Really? So what of the American kids? Do they get shoved to the back of the line, then? American kids don't have to bear the burden of being the offspring of illegal immigrants. Yes, these Hispanic kids have lived here all of their lives, but the only way to teach them anything is to send them back home with their parents. Actions have consequences, breaking laws have consequences. Their parents knew they were breaking the law, they never once thought it would destroy the future of their child(ren).

I feel sorry for them, I really do. No, they shouldn't be punished for the actions of their parents. But knowing kids, they probably grew up watching their parents violate the sovereignty of another nation by breaking its laws , mainly the immigration ones. The only way you teach them a healthy respect for the law is to send them back where they came from. Hey, it isn't their fault, it's their parents'.

We should deport every single illegal regardless of how they got here. Send them all a packing. Then watch our economy implode. Get ready for times worse than the Great Depression. 25% unemployment would be a good unemployment rate.

We should enforce the laws on the books and punish businesses for hiring undocumented workers................via E-Verify...........which the GOP just pushed up and the Dems said our bill or nothing.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Tom Tancredo is not teh GOP.
Wow, that's really really stupid even for an ignorant knuckle dragging cocksucking dolt like you.
A new low!

Oh, really, spermswallower? Well, let's see:

Tom Tancredo - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Quote:

"Thomas Gerard "Tom" Tancredo (/tæŋˈkreɪdoʊ/; born December 20, 1945) is an American politician from Colorado, who represented the state's sixth congressional district in the United States House of Representatives from 1999 to 2009, as a Republican. He ran for President of the United States during the 2008 election, and was the Constitution Party's unsuccessful nominee for Governor of Colorado in 2010.

Tancredo was initially elected to the Colorado House of Representatives in 1976 and served two terms. After working in the United States Department of Education during the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush Administrations, he was elected to the United States Congress, and served five terms. He decided to not seek re-election in 2008.[1]Tancredo ran for the Republican Party nomination for President in 2008, centering his campaign on the issues of illegal immigration and terrorism. He dropped out of the race in December 2007 to assist former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney in his campaign for the nomination.

Tancredo announced on July 26, 2010 that he planned to change parties and run for Governor of Colorado on the American Constitution Party ticket. He received 617,030 votes (36.7%), coming in second place, well ahead of the Republican Party nominee, who got about 11% of the vote.

Tancredo ran for governor in 2014, this time as a Republican, because of his opposition to current Colorado governor John Hickenlooper's refusal to execute convicted murderer Nathan Dunlap, as well as Hickenlooper's attempts to pass gun control legislation.[2] Tancredo competed for the Republican Party's nomination with Bob Beauprez, Steve House,Greg Brophy, Mike Kopp, and Scott Gessler. Tancredo lost the primary to Beauprez."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, dick-breath, Tancredo IS a Republican.

Must suck to be you. Really, it must. Doesn't it hurt you to make such an utter fool out of yourself all the time.

Geez.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Republicans need to whatever is necessary to stop this bastard from dumping another 34 million freeloaders on us when are economy is already teetering. ******* asshole!

They are already here....have been here all their life. You really are heartless.

He's a Conservative! What do you expect?

 

[Statistikhengst]

Tom Tacredo leader of the Republican party.... Who knew?

Where did I ever write that he was a leader of the Republican Party?

I didn't.

I wrote that he is a GOPer.

Please take an IQ test until you can at least get out of negative digits.

Thanks!

 

[S.J.]

Tom Tacredo leader of the Republican party.... Who knew?

Where did I ever write that he was a leader of the Republican Party?

I didn't.

I wrote that he is a GOPer.

Please take an IQ test until you can at least get out of negative digits.

Thanks!

You presented his comments as if he spoke on behalf of all Republicans, you disingenuous *****.

 

[Judicial review]

You guys need to listen to me. Obama will be impeached with bipartison support out of office. He wont finish his second term. Ive been saying this for years.

 

[S.J.]

You guys need to listen to me. Obama will be impeached with bipartison support out of office. He wont finish his second term. Ive been saying this for years.

I hope you're right. I would vote to impeach the bastard.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Tom Tacredo leader of the Republican party.... Who knew?

Where did I ever write that he was a leader of the Republican Party?

I didn't.

I wrote that he is a GOPer.

Please take an IQ test until you can at least get out of negative digits.

Thanks!

You presented his comments as if he spoke on behalf of all Republicans, you disingenuous *****.

No, I didn't I referred to one specific GOPer, one who also has name recognition.

Have a nice day.

 

[Statistikhengst]

And of course, FOX news is on the bandwagon:

Citing Baseless Claim Of Blanket Amnesty Fox s Megyn Kelly Suggests Obama May Offend Republicans Into Impeaching Him Video Media Matters for America

Meghan Kelly:

"What Would [Obama] Have To Do To Make It An Impeachable Offense?... that he would so offend the Republicans..."

(02:00 into the video)

 

[TemplarKormac]

And, I still can't fathom people so heartless that they would deport young people who have lived here all their life, brought here not of their own volition and being sent to a place where they have never lived and may not have anyone they even know living there. How cruel is that?

Really? So what of the American kids? Do they get shoved to the back of the line, then? American kids don't have to bear the burden of being the offspring of illegal immigrants. Yes, these Hispanic kids have lived here all of their lives, but the only way to teach them anything is to send them back home with their parents. Actions have consequences, breaking laws have consequences. Their parents knew they were breaking the law, they never once thought it would destroy the future of their child(ren).

I feel sorry for them, I really do. No, they shouldn't be punished for the actions of their parents. But knowing kids, they probably grew up watching their parents violate the sovereignty of another nation by breaking its laws , mainly the immigration ones. The only way you teach them a healthy respect for the law is to send them back where they came from. Hey, it isn't their fault, it's their parents'.

We should deport every single illegal regardless of how they got here. Send them all a packing. Then watch our economy implode. Get ready for times worse than the Great Depression. 25% unemployment would be a good unemployment rate.

It wouldn't be 25% if you employed Americans over illegals. Thing is you never will. Dirt cheap illegal immigrant labor over quality American labor. Right. We can just simply keep millions of Americans sitting on their couches while we employ people who don't even belong here because of some twisted and malformed sense of compassion.

Your sarcasm takes place of a cogent counterpoint. Yes, let's tell legal Americans and their children that illegals and their children take precedent. Tell me, just who does this country belong to? Us or them? We are natural born Americans, or legal immigrants. But according to you America belongs to people who broke our laws to get here.

 

[NLT]

Republican amnesty game plan missing in action

There have always been two main arguments against impeachment even among those who support it in principle – first, that it is not practical because it would never succeed in the Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate, and secondly that, well, you just can’t impeach the first black president no matter what he has done. But given the likely new political circumstances post-Nov. 4, both of those arguments have lost their power.

In the first place, impeachment is no longer “impractical.” In fact, it is the only practical means of stopping the president from undertaking unconstitutional actions. Lawsuits won’t work because even if you win in court after a two-year long appeal process, the Supreme Court’s decision would be moot: The amnesty could not be undone. Everyone understands this.

If Republicans capture the majority in the U.S. Senate as now appears almost certain, the 2015 Congress is a new ballgame. If the House were to bring impeachment charges based on not only the amnesty but several other unconstitutional actions, do Democratic senators want to run for re-election in 2016 on a platform that starts with apologizing for Obama’s unconstitutional behavior?

Here’s the key question: Is Obama so popular now that Democrats in 2015 and 2016 will fall on their swords to defend him? Do Senate Democrats want a vote against impeachment to be the defining issue in their 2016 campaigns, while also defending the influx of millions of additional illegal aliens across our unguarded borders?

The Obama presidency is self-destructing. All that is needed to neutralize his planned amnesty and other unconstitutional actions is Republican courage to follow the Constitution and impeach the man.

Tom (Nuke Mecca) Tancredo was a GOP presidential candidate in 2008. He lost a gubernatorial bid as a Constitution Party candidate in 2010 when Republican Dan Maes completely imploded down to 10%. He also lost a primary bid in this year.

In short, Tom Tancredo, a racist, bigot, homophobe, and loser in general, is a GOPer.

So yeah, no GOPers are talking about "impeachment". Uhuh.


Fun times ahead.

They should be, Obama needs to be impeached and brought up on treason charges.

 

[The Rabbi]

And of course, FOX news is on the bandwagon:

Citing Baseless Claim Of Blanket Amnesty Fox s Megyn Kelly Suggests Obama May Offend Republicans Into Impeaching Him Video Media Matters for America

Meghan Kelly:

"What Would [Obama] Have To Do To Make It An Impeachable Offense?... that he would so offend the Republicans..."

(02:00 into the video)

Fox News is not the GOP.
/fail

 

[Kosh]

Republican amnesty game plan missing in action

There have always been two main arguments against impeachment even among those who support it in principle – first, that it is not practical because it would never succeed in the Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate, and secondly that, well, you just can’t impeach the first black president no matter what he has done. But given the likely new political circumstances post-Nov. 4, both of those arguments have lost their power.

In the first place, impeachment is no longer “impractical.” In fact, it is the only practical means of stopping the president from undertaking unconstitutional actions. Lawsuits won’t work because even if you win in court after a two-year long appeal process, the Supreme Court’s decision would be moot: The amnesty could not be undone. Everyone understands this.

If Republicans capture the majority in the U.S. Senate as now appears almost certain, the 2015 Congress is a new ballgame. If the House were to bring impeachment charges based on not only the amnesty but several other unconstitutional actions, do Democratic senators want to run for re-election in 2016 on a platform that starts with apologizing for Obama’s unconstitutional behavior?

Here’s the key question: Is Obama so popular now that Democrats in 2015 and 2016 will fall on their swords to defend him? Do Senate Democrats want a vote against impeachment to be the defining issue in their 2016 campaigns, while also defending the influx of millions of additional illegal aliens across our unguarded borders?

The Obama presidency is self-destructing. All that is needed to neutralize his planned amnesty and other unconstitutional actions is Republican courage to follow the Constitution and impeach the man.

Tom (Nuke Mecca) Tancredo was a GOP presidential candidate in 2008. He lost a gubernatorial bid as a Constitution Party candidate in 2010 when Republican Dan Maes completely imploded down to 10%. He also lost a primary bid in this year.

In short, Tom Tancredo, a racist, bigot, homophobe, and loser in general, is a GOPer.

So yeah, no GOPers are talking about "impeachment". Uhuh.


Fun times ahead.

Wow! A far left poster using a far left drone site for their so called "facts"..

Amazing!

NOT!

 

[Statistikhengst]

And of course, FOX news is on the bandwagon:

Citing Baseless Claim Of Blanket Amnesty Fox s Megyn Kelly Suggests Obama May Offend Republicans Into Impeaching Him Video Media Matters for America

Meghan Kelly:

"What Would [Obama] Have To Do To Make It An Impeachable Offense?... that he would so offend the Republicans..."

(02:00 into the video)

Fox News is not the GOP.
/fail

No. FOX News is the megaphone for the GOP, you dumbfuck.

 

[Kosh]

And of course, FOX news is on the bandwagon:

Citing Baseless Claim Of Blanket Amnesty Fox s Megyn Kelly Suggests Obama May Offend Republicans Into Impeaching Him Video Media Matters for America

Meghan Kelly:

"What Would [Obama] Have To Do To Make It An Impeachable Offense?... that he would so offend the Republicans..."

(02:00 into the video)

Fox News is not the GOP.
/fail

No. FOX News is the megaphone for the GOP, you dumbfuck.

Says the far left hack that used a far left hack site for their "facts"..