Noaa Says We're Now At The 3rd Warmest Year For 2014(stall Keeps Going!)

And, Billy Bob, you just got your silly ass well kicked on your lies concerning the 'global cooling' controversy of the 1970's. So you change the subject.

Real scientists have settled the warming issue already. And the discussion today among real scientists is how soon and how bad.

One; your kicking your own ass with bull shit..

Two: The only thing settled is that CAGW, Global warming, climate change, climate disruption, etc, etc has all been a lie fabricated on the control of the populace and the want to steal wealth from one and give to another. COMMUNISM! Its a big sham and a lie from the word go. The paleo records show CO2 at over 7,000 ppm and no runaway warming.. yet you purse this lie with all the fever of a thief after my pocketbook...
 
Let me ask the warmies: what are all you marxists going to do with the hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars you're attempting to extort from Western governments? Where's that money going to go if by some incredible longshot chance, you get your thieving hands on it? Answers please. This is always the point in the conversation where warmies slink back to their burrows and don't want to talk anymore. They have to invent another bodyguard of lies first.
 
Publication Abstracts
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.


U.S. Drought Monitor U.S. Drought Portal

Climate Alters Mongolian Past And Present Inside Science

Tree-ring data sheds light on climate change's historic and modern impact.
Originally published:
Mar 10 2014 - 3:00pm
By:
Marcus Woo, ISNS Contributor
(ISNS) -- The drought that devastated Mongolia in the early part of the last decade killed tens of millions of livestock, forcing hundreds of thousands of people to flee the countryside and seek new lives in the capital city of Ulaanbaatar — a shift that has been transforming the country ever since.

Researchers now know that the drought was the hottest of the last 1,000 years and was likely exacerbated by global warming.

As global temperatures continue to rise this type of severe drought could become more frequent, with potentially drastic consequences to central Asia, according to researchers.
 
Blah blah blah. Our rainfall has been fantastic. Our temperature perfect. My lawn is greener than ever. The lake water levels are up, there are no water restrictions, and it's been the nicest summer that I can remember in a long time. If this is climate change, bring some more of it.
 
Let me ask the warmies: what are all you marxists going to do with the hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars you're attempting to extort from Western governments? Where's that money going to go if by some incredible longshot chance, you get your thieving hands on it? Answers please. This is always the point in the conversation where warmies slink back to their burrows and don't want to talk anymore. They have to invent another bodyguard of lies first.

Hey, what are you Nazis going to do when the shit hits the fan? And it surely will.

That you are abysmally stupid, and willfully ignorant is evident in that you have to throw around political terms in a scientific arguement.

The government and nation that successfully manufactures non-polluting sources of energy will be the leading nation in the future. People like you are doing your best to make sure that it is some other nation.
 
Blah blah blah. Our rainfall has been fantastic. Our temperature perfect. My lawn is greener than ever. The lake water levels are up, there are no water restrictions, and it's been the nicest summer that I can remember in a long time. If this is climate change, bring some more of it.

And, I assume, you live in California, in the same house and bedroom as Elektra.
 
Let's see the planet's average annual temp is now 57.3 over the last 114 years? Seems kind of cool in here.

Strange the big fluctuations in temperatures are mostly in the middle latitudes. Shouldn't CO2 trap the heat more consistently at the same latitudes? Angle of the sun more similar all that.
 
Let's see the planet's average annual temp is now 57.3 over the last 114 years? Seems kind of cool in here.

Strange the big fluctuations in temperatures are mostly in the middle latitudes. Shouldn't CO2 trap the heat more consistently at the same latitudes? Angle of the sun more similar all that.

CAGW requires that a mid tropospheric hot spot trap heat. There is none and there never has been one. it is an integral part of the hypothesis. which lays the premiss waste..
 
Publication Abstracts
Hansen et al. 1981
Hansen, J., D. Johnson, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, P. Lee, D. Rind, and G. Russell, 1981: Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science, 213, 957-966, doi:10.1126/science.213.4511.957.

The global temperature rose 0.2°C between the middle 1960s and 1980, yielding a warming of 0.4°C in the past century. This temperature increase is consistent with the calculated effect due to measured increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Variations of volcanic aerosols and possibly solar luminosity appear to be primary causes of observed fluctuations about the mean trend of increasing temperature. It is shown that the anthropogenic carbon dioxide warming should emerge from the noise level of natural climate variability by the end of the century, and there is a high probability of warming in the 1980s. Potential effects on climate in the 21st century include the creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.


U.S. Drought Monitor U.S. Drought Portal

Climate Alters Mongolian Past And Present Inside Science

Tree-ring data sheds light on climate change's historic and modern impact.
Originally published:
Mar 10 2014 - 3:00pm
By:
Marcus Woo, ISNS Contributor
(ISNS) -- The drought that devastated Mongolia in the early part of the last decade killed tens of millions of livestock, forcing hundreds of thousands of people to flee the countryside and seek new lives in the capital city of Ulaanbaatar — a shift that has been transforming the country ever since.

Researchers now know that the drought was the hottest of the last 1,000 years and was likely exacerbated by global warming.

As global temperatures continue to rise this type of severe drought could become more frequent, with potentially drastic consequences to central Asia, according to researchers.

A cold PDO is the cause, not Mann/Hansen's boogie man CO2, if you studied ocean systems you would know that.
 
Whom to trust...

Data sets which are constantly manipulated... Showing a 0.68 deg C rise

OR

The USCRN which shows all of the NH regions cooling by -0.6 deg C.

That is a 1.28 deg C deviation. do I trust a system which is constantly monitored and sited so that corrections are never necessary or the manipulated data from GISS/NOAA?

It sure as hell wont be GISS/NOAA!! that much data manipulation is beyond gross negligence to willful fraud!

Links, you silly asshole. Why on earth do you think that anyone should take anything posted on the net by persons unkown at face value.

global-cooling.jpg


Time-Global-Cooling.png
 
Old Rock’s idea of scientific disputation: "Links, you silly asshole".

Drunk tonight, Old Rocks? Been hittin' the bottle again, have we? Did you kick the dog and slap the old lady when you got back from the union hall meeting tonight? Listen idiot, I don't care how many blathering marxist morons line up behind the warmie agenda. They're borg. They think with a single mind. They do what they're pressured to do and what they're told to do. They've lined up behind insidious lies before. "Global cooling" was the one before "global warming". From coolie to warmie in 35 years. That's quite a trick. And they want us to believe their noses don't grow another inch every time they open their lying mouths.

How about that cause they lined up behind in the 20's and 30's? The one that had academia's staunchest support. The one that saw doctoral programs at Harvard, Yale, The University of Chicago, and other top-tier universities. It was called "eugenics". Familiar with that cause, moron? Small wonder Hitler had no problem with it. Western academics were lined up like a bunch of bleating sheep, proselytizing the idea of murdering genetic undesirables.

You're just another borg. You lie on the Internet because that's what you've been told to do. You lie about being a graduate in some earth science or other but you always come across as crass, stupid, intolerant and dogmatic. So people should give you any credibility, right? Wrong.
 
Whom to trust...

Data sets which are constantly manipulated... Showing a 0.68 deg C rise

OR

The USCRN which shows all of the NH regions cooling by -0.6 deg C.

That is a 1.28 deg C deviation. do I trust a system which is constantly monitored and sited so that corrections are never necessary or the manipulated data from GISS/NOAA?

It sure as hell wont be GISS/NOAA!! that much data manipulation is beyond gross negligence to willful fraud!

Links, you silly asshole. Why on earth do you think that anyone should take anything posted on the net by persons unkown at face value.

global-cooling.jpg


Time-Global-Cooling.png

So, you consider Time and Newsweek to be peer reviewed journals? Sheesh!
 
Old Rock’s idea of scientific disputation: "Links, you silly asshole".

Drunk tonight, Old Rocks? Been hittin' the bottle again, have we? Did you kick the dog and slap the old lady when you got back from the union hall meeting tonight? Listen idiot, I don't care how many blathering marxist morons line up behind the warmie agenda. They're borg. They think with a single mind. They do what they're pressured to do and what they're told to do. They've lined up behind insidious lies before. "Global cooling" was the one before "global warming". From coolie to warmie in 35 years. That's quite a trick. And they want us to believe their noses don't grow another inch every time they open their lying mouths.

How about that cause they lined up behind in the 20's and 30's? The one that had academia's staunchest support. The one that saw doctoral programs at Harvard, Yale, The University of Chicago, and other top-tier universities. It was called "eugenics". Familiar with that cause, moron? Small wonder Hitler had no problem with it. Western academics were lined up like a bunch of bleating sheep, proselytizing the idea of murdering genetic undesirables.

You're just another borg. You lie on the Internet because that's what you've been told to do. You lie about being a graduate in some earth science or other but you always come across as crass, stupid, intolerant and dogmatic. So people should give you any credibility, right? Wrong.

No links, no credibility. As you have failed to even once link a credible source for your opinions, I will amend that description of you. Silly willfully ignorant asshole. Feel better?

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Real science from real scientists, not idiots on an internet message board.
 
And, Sweety, baby, however you try to change the arguement, you still need links. For sure, nobody would give anything that you say any credibility after reading a post or two of yours.
 
Why does oceanfront property keep its value, if it is getting swallowed up by the melting ice?
 
Whom to trust...

Data sets which are constantly manipulated... Showing a 0.68 deg C rise

OR

The USCRN which shows all of the NH regions cooling by -0.6 deg C.

That is a 1.28 deg C deviation. do I trust a system which is constantly monitored and sited so that corrections are never necessary or the manipulated data from GISS/NOAA?

It sure as hell wont be GISS/NOAA!! that much data manipulation is beyond gross negligence to willful fraud!
Remember, they're only adjusted because they're not accurate. They ain't fudging anything, just ensuring accuracy. Because somehow they know how warm it is really supposed to be, I guess! LOL. :whip:
 
15th post
US average temperature? Lower 48? Less than 2% of the earth's surface? Do you really think that everyone is as stupid as you are?

Plus, that is from Watts site, the site of a known liar. Hardly credible in a scientfic discussion.
Your using the Historical climate network. which also covers the lower 48... To funny. its ok for you to use but not ok for me....
Don't you know only their data counts? Come on, even I know that.
 
COMMUNISM!

Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo ...

Billy, please tell everyone exactly what subject your Ph.D. was in, the university and year, and what your dissertation consisted of.

Come on, put us dirty liberals in our place. That will teach us for all those times we beat you up on the playground, stole your girl, had all the fun and always made you look stupid on the internet.
 
COMMUNISM!

Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo ...

Billy, please tell everyone exactly what subject your Ph.D. was in, the university and year, and what your dissertation consisted of.

Come on, put us dirty liberals in our place. That will teach us for all those times we beat you up on the playground, stole your girl, had all the fun and always made you look stupid on the internet.
More lies, there is no way you could even think to do any of that. That's just your wet dream to be like a conservative thinking being. :rock: WiNNiNg.
 
Good comeback all you so called, "deniers" which is what the cult of Albert (Bore) Gore globull warming calls you.

Warmers don't like to be hit back with facts that don't mesh with their propaganda

good job:happy-1:
 
Back
Top Bottom