No...Trump didn't break the law with Ukraine funds...so stop drooling, left wingers

[edthecynic]

Your question was based on a LIE, and you know it!
The FACT that there was NO Burisma investigation going on at the time. DUH!!!!
You were lying again!

Not true. Simply untrue. Is any rational human being supposed to think that Joe Biden would simply cut off aid to Ukraine if an investigator doing nothing was not immediately fired?

That's crazy.

You are a CRAZY LIAR!
That is exactly the reason the corrupt "investigator" was fired, and even YOU know it!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You are a CRAZY LIAR!
That is exactly the reason the corrupt "investigator" was fired, and even YOU know it!

You may be stupid enough to think Joe Biden would intercede in Ukrainian affairs, when it wasn't his place or business to do so, and simply cut off all US aid to a nation already threatened by Russia, if a certain investigator was not fired, but I doubt anyone else with a functioning brain stem would.

Why would he butt into Ukrainian affairs like that? Why should he care? Why wouldn't Ukraine simply fire somebody themselves if he wasn't doing a proper job?

Nothing you claim makes sense except as a way to cover Biden's ass after he got someone sniffing around Burisma and his money pipeline terminated!

 

[edthecynic]

You are a CRAZY LIAR!
That is exactly the reason the corrupt "investigator" was fired, and even YOU know it!

You may be stupid enough to think Joe Biden would intercede in Ukrainian affairs, when it wasn't his place or business to do so, and simply cut off all US aid to a nation already threatened by Russia, if a certain investigator was not fired, but I doubt anyone else with a functioning brain stem would.

Why would he butt into Ukrainian affairs like that? Why should he care? Why wouldn't Ukraine simply fire somebody themselves if he wasn't doing a proper job?

Nothing you claim makes sense except as a way to cover Biden's ass after he got someone sniffing around Burisma and his money pipeline terminated!

All you do is mindlessly parrot the same debunked RUSSIAN lies over and over.
Grow up, child!
Trump ad misleads about Biden, Ukraine and the prosecutor
There is evidence that many Western leaders and institutions, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption activists, viewed Shokin as corrupt and ineffective for failing to prosecute anybody of significance, and for protecting members of Yanukovych’s and Poroshenko’s circles.

When Shokin was fired in the spring of 2016, press reports explicitly linked his ouster to corruption.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

All you do is mindlessly parrot the same debunked RUSSIAN lies over and over.
Grow up, child!
Trump ad misleads about Biden, Ukraine and the prosecutor
There is evidence that many Western leaders and institutions, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption activists, viewed Shokin as corrupt and ineffective for failing to prosecute anybody of significance, and for protecting members of Yanukovych’s and Poroshenko’s circles.

When Shokin was fired in the spring of 2016, press reports explicitly linked his ouster to corruption.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
If you can read you owe it to the truth to see why you are so wrong.
Of course you don't seem to care about the truth but maybe you're just extremely ignorant of the truth. That's how it seems, anyway. And I doubt you'll read something that contradicts your myths and memes.

In any event it's not Joe Biden's concern or business to pull a quid pro quo in order to rid Ukraine of corrupt officials (which isn't to say Shokin is corrupt). And yeah I know he's
not in office anymore.
Ukraine is incredibly corrupt.
If Biden wants to make ridding Ukraine of corruption a condition for receiving aid
then the Ukraine would never get a nickle of American money. And it's not Biden's
business or purview to make those calls anyway.

Joe was protecting his money. End of story. Get a brain cell.

 

[edthecynic]

All you do is mindlessly parrot the same debunked RUSSIAN lies over and over.
Grow up, child!
Trump ad misleads about Biden, Ukraine and the prosecutor
There is evidence that many Western leaders and institutions, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption activists, viewed Shokin as corrupt and ineffective for failing to prosecute anybody of significance, and for protecting members of Yanukovych’s and Poroshenko’s circles.

When Shokin was fired in the spring of 2016, press reports explicitly linked his ouster to corruption.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story
If you can read you owe it to the truth to see why you are so wrong.
Of course you don't seem to care about the truth but maybe you're just extremely ignorant of the truth.
That's how it seems, anyway. And I doubt you'll read something that contradicts your myths and memes.

Salami has NO credibility. He is nothing but a Russian HACK!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Salami has NO credibility. He is nothing but a Russian HACK!

The memos themselves have credence, you moron!

 

[edthecynic]

Salami has NO credibility. He is nothing but a Russian HACK!

The memos themselves have credence, you moron!

They are FAKE, like everything from the Right!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

They are FAKE, like everything from the Right!

Everything is fake except what you've been told to believe.
You don't even know what they say but you know they are fake. You're a worthless piece of trash.

 

[edthecynic]

They are FAKE, like everything from the Right!

Everything is fake except what you've been told to believe.
You don't even know what they say but you know they are fake. You're a worthless piece of trash.

So you say I am very Trumpian!

 

[wamose]

Trump would have been derelict in his duties if he didn't want to know about the Biden family extortion. Trump can't let Americans of political families to act lawlessly. How will any country take Trump seriously if he allows American politicians to practice criminal enterprises abroad. Again, Democrats got things ass backward. It would have been an impeachable offense if Trump ignored Biden's criminality. And while they're investigating the Bidens, they should look into similar sweetheart jobs given to Pelosi's and Kerry's sons. It seems as if the Democrats are operating a crime syndicate. It's understandable why Schumer won't entertain allowing the Bidens to testify. Their guilt exonerates Trump and they're guilty as sin.

 

[edthecynic]

Trump would have been derelict in his duties if he didn't want to know about the Biden family extortion. Trump can't let Americans of political families to act lawlessly. How will any country take Trump seriously if he allows American politicians to practice criminal enterprises abroad. Again, Democrats got things ass backward. It would have been an impeachable offense if Trump ignored Biden's criminality. And while they're investigating the Bidens, they should look into similar sweetheart jobs given to Pelosi's and Kerry's sons. It seems as if the Democrats are operating a crime syndicate. It's understandable why Schumer won't entertain allowing the Bidens to testify. Their guilt exonerates Trump and they're guilty as sin.

Pure BULLSHIT!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

So you say I am very Trumpian!

No. You are a brain washed loser.

 

[edthecynic]

So you say I am very Trumpian!

No. You are a brain washed loser.

Again that would make me very Trumpian.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Again that would make me very Trumpian.

Trump is president and by all accounts will have a second term. There is nothing Trump about you.

 

[boilermaker55]

You, nor anyone else, can convince the tRUMPsters they are the ones with TDS, for blindly following the dope they chose to follow.
Why even with tRUMP ..."President Donald Trump said at a press conference in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday, LIED.. and makes 14 false claims about impeachment and Ukraine.
President Trump says 'with me, there's no lying' -- and makes 14 false claims about impeachment and Ukraine - CNNPolitics

the administration didn’t have an obligation to release the funds on any specific date in the fiscal year.

But they didn't spend it in time and Congress had to pass an extension to get the money to Ukraine, and there is still $35.2 million outstanding.
So yes Tramp DID break the law.
But you knew that already because the Right claim they know more than anyone else.

Wrong, you dope.....as the link points out....

And had the money not gone out in time, the procedure is for congress to sue the executive branch to tell them to spend the money.....no law was broken no matter how badly you want to have a Trump Impeachment Orgasm...

Repeating your lie does not make it any less a lie, it only makes you a serial liar.
I have already posted in this very thread the link to the law that extended the time to send the money to Ukraine into Fiscal year 2020 because the money was NOT sent to Ukraine by the end of the fiscal year 2019.
So it is undeniable that lying POS Tramp DID violate the the Impoundment Control Act of 1974.
But you fellow Tramp lying scum will still deny it!!!!!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

"Facts First: There is no evidence anyone has "disappeared" or said "we got problems" upon seeing the rough transcript -- which overwhelmingly corroborated the allegations of the first whistleblower. According to the second whistleblower's lawyer, that person never planned to file a separate complaint, only to provide corroborating information to support the first complaint. Whistleblowers have no obligation to speak publicly, and them not doing so doesn't mean they "disappeared."

Well first of all, these sorts of allegations by an admitted purveyors of lies themselves, CNN, is ironic
Trump is not making statements of "facts" per se but of opinion and rhetoric.
CNN is not disputing Trump "facts". It's all bullshit!

He is saying where is this second alleged whistleblower? Schiff can allege dozens of whistleblowers but if there is no evidence of a single one (trust me, says Schiff...we have all these witnesses) what credibility does Schiff have?
Again rhetorical...Schiff has no credibility.

Whether this whistleblower makes an appearance or not (so odd but if I had a second whisteblower corroborating the first I would provide some evidence of their existence).
Trump questioning his existence is not a "lie".

If a whistleblower never appears to begin with can the ideologues at CNN dispute Trump when he asks where did he go?