No such thing as settled science or concensus

[Dante]

and what's that have to do with climate?

again

Wake up.

 

[jc456]

again

Wake up.

so nothing huh? still can't state the problem. you remain amazingly stupid.

 

[Dante]

One of the many reasons sane, rational people reject Manmade Global Warming is that the arrogant dishonest group trying to pass it off as “fact” tells us “the science is settled”

It’s one of the most dishonest, anti- science statements anyone can make. But it does expose the fraud

Here is an article describing how Einstein’s Relativity still hadn’t reached the lofty heights of “settled science”

Study finds black holes made from light are impossible — challenging Einstein's theory of relativity

The Causes of Climate Change​

Human activities are driving the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century.

Takeaways​

• The greenhouse effect is essential to life on Earth, but human-made emissions in the atmosphere are trapping and slowing heat loss to space.
• Five key greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, chlorofluorocarbons, and water vapor.
• While the Sun has played a role in past climate changes, the evidence shows the current warming cannot be explained by the Sun.

Causes - NASA Science

Scientists attribute the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century to the human expansion of the "greenhouse effect"1 — warming that results

science.nasa.gov

Which is why I say "You people and your offspring should be made to pay later on down the line as the world suffers. You people obstruct -- get in the way."

 

[jc456]

The Causes of Climate Change​

Human activities are driving the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century.

what's the problem? You still haven't defined it. Why?

Takeaways​

• The greenhouse effect is essential to life on Earth, but human-made emissions in the atmosphere are trapping and slowing heat loss to space.

no such thing as this. In fact, I'd argue there's more Oxygen in the atmosphere right now. Look at the forest fires!!!

• Five key greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, chlorofluorocarbons, and water vapor.

Water vapor is more detrimental than any other gases.

• While the Sun has played a role in past climate changes, the evidence shows the current warming cannot be explained by the Sun.

it can't be explained by anyone.

Causes - NASA Science

Scientists attribute the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century to the human expansion of the "greenhouse effect"1 — warming that results

science.nasa.gov

Which is why I say "You people and your offspring should be made to pay later on down the line as the world suffers. You people obstruct -- get in the way."

what is the problem we're gonna get blamed for?

 

[jc456]

The Causes of Climate Change​

Human activities are driving the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century.

Takeaways​

• The greenhouse effect is essential to life on Earth, but human-made emissions in the atmosphere are trapping and slowing heat loss to space.
• Five key greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, chlorofluorocarbons, and water vapor.
• While the Sun has played a role in past climate changes, the evidence shows the current warming cannot be explained by the Sun.

Causes - NASA Science

Scientists attribute the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century to the human expansion of the "greenhouse effect"1 — warming that results

science.nasa.gov

Which is why I say "You people and your offspring should be made to pay later on down the line as the world suffers. You people obstruct -- get in the way."

 

[Crick]

I am not a welder. Welding on the hull requires no nationally recognized certifications. Electric Boat certifies thier welders.

I have never been an Electric Boat employee. I go from contract to contract for my company.

I do have an interview with SpaceX next month. SpaceX just bought my plane ticket and booked the hotel for the interview.

I am also looking at another corporation which may take me to Dubai for work.

How would you characterize what you do?

 

[elektra]

How would you characterize what you do?

I do Non destructive testing, my method is eddy current. Quality Control

 

[Crick]

I do Non destructive testing, my method is eddy current. Quality Control

Ok.

 

[BackAgain]

and what's that have to do with climate?

He truly can’t distinguish between polluting and causing climate change.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

and what's that have to do with climate?

What do the atmosphere and land and oceans have to do with climate?

The stupid

It...

It burns

 

[jc456]

What do the atmosphere and land and oceans have to do with climate?

The stupid

It...

It burns

Well my response was to poisoning. Not sure what you’re referring to

 

[Crick]

So you say. How about a picture? Like these.










View attachment 1001477
The fellow in the white shirt is me. We were taking a break from our work while the ship made high speed acoustic runs. The acoustic guy on the range vessel - a friend of mine - was taking pictures as we blasted by and I had walked aft to see the rooster tail.

View attachment 1001483
I can't actually remember where we were here, but this dark vessel is the Russian destroyer Admiral Chabanenko. The cone-shaped superstructure on the far left is HMS Dauntless (D32), the Royal Navy's second Type 45 destroyer. We were working with Dauntless.

 

[EMH]

The Causes of Climate Change​

Human activities are driving the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century.

Takeaways​

• The greenhouse effect is essential to life on Earth, but human-made emissions in the atmosphere are trapping and slowing heat loss to space.
• Five key greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, chlorofluorocarbons, and water vapor.
• While the Sun has played a role in past climate changes, the evidence shows the current warming cannot be explained by the Sun.

Causes - NASA Science

Scientists attribute the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century to the human expansion of the "greenhouse effect"1 — warming that results

science.nasa.gov

Which is why I say "You people and your offspring should be made to pay later on down the line as the world suffers. You people obstruct -- get in the way."

Since you are such the left wing expert on climate change, surely you can answer some simple climate questions...

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

 

[Crick]

Since you are such the left wing expert on climate change, surely you can answer some simple climate questions...

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

You need to get off the internet and seek psychiatric help. Seriously. No joke. See a doctor. Soon.

 

[EMH]

You need to get off the internet and seek psychiatric help. Seriously. No joke. See a doctor. Soon.

Why, because you and the entire Co2 FRAUD, 10k horseshit excuses of "scientists," cannot answer 5 basic climate questions...

LOL!!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why, because you and the entire Co2 FRAUD, 10k horseshit excuses of "scientists," cannot answer 5 basic climate questions...

LOL!!

You idiot. Of course scientists could explain your questions and then laugh you out of the room.

That's why your dumbass is on an internet message board and not trying out.your act on scientists.

 

[ReinyDays]

One of the many reasons sane, rational people reject Manmade Global Warming is that the arrogant dishonest group trying to pass it off as “fact” tells us “the science is settled”

It’s one of the most dishonest, anti- science statements anyone can make. But it does expose the fraud

Here is an article describing how Einstein’s Relativity still hadn’t reached the lofty heights of “settled science”

Study finds black holes made from light are impossible — challenging Einstein's theory of relativity

Most broadly, there is some "settled science" ... if you and I agree that Newton's Law of Gravity holds true in all place and at all times in the universe, then we could have a factual discussion about 7 of the 8 planetary orbits ... predicting Jupiter's orbit is settled science ... Jupiter orbits a spot that in turn orbits the Earth ... easy peasy ... "Epicycles", if there's a Wikipedia article, it has to be true ...

Ha ha ...

My point is we can agree on what's "settled" and what's not ... if most all of science agrees, then we create scientific laws ... we assume Newton's Law of Gravity, we assume the three Laws of Thermodynamics, we assume Planck's Radiation Law ... and it is from these basic Laws we build our logic and our theories ...

All science can and should be questioned ... it's not religion ...

 

[ding]

All science can and should be questioned ... it's not religion ...

Unless it's AGW. We can't question that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Most broadly, there is some "settled science" ... if you and I agree that Newton's Law of Gravity holds true in all place and at all times in the universe, then we could have a factual discussion about 7 of the 8 planetary orbits ... predicting Jupiter's orbit is settled science ... Jupiter orbits a spot that in turn orbits the Earth ... easy peasy ... "Epicycles", if there's a Wikipedia article, it has to be true ...

Ha ha ...

My point is we can agree on what's "settled" and what's not ... if most all of science agrees, then we create scientific laws ... we assume Newton's Law of Gravity, we assume the three Laws of Thermodynamics, we assume Planck's Radiation Law ... and it is from these basic Laws we build our logic and our theories ...

All science can and should be questioned ... it's not religion ...

Mostly agreed.

Newton law of gravity was RIGOROUSLY tested before being generally accepted as correct in most circumstances

The only way I will ever accept AGW is when someone shows a test controlling for a 120PPM delta of CO2 (either up or down) that moves the thermometer

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Most broadly, there is some "settled science" ...

Indeed. Some science is so robust and definitive that nobody wastes their time challenging it.

Like, the Theory of Electromagnetism.