BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Securing an indictment charging shit about the allegedly classified papers? Or proving a negative? Either way, the reasonableness or unreasonableness of President Trump is beside the point entirely.Being that trump is such an unreasonable person, that should be easy to prove.
He said so. And he can also call Kash Patel. There’s the evidence. And once it’s in evidence, the government has to disprove it. The real question is how could the government disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt?Either there's evidence to back him up or there isn't.
There isn’t always a paper trail. But it seems as though the Trump failed to create one. Perhaps sloppy. But not proof of a failure to have declassified the documents.There's always a paper trail and anything the government does, probably in triplicate.
No. I don’t. You just need to open your eyes.Again you are making assumptions about corruption, you have to prove that.
Wrong. What’s pitiful is your ability to comprehend. Most of the documents were not marked classified. And as for those that were, if they were declassified by President Trump, then they became just mere Presidential Records. The analogy to borrowing a book from a library is spot on. And that’s the real reason you have a problem with it.Comparing secret and top secret documents with an overdue library book is ludicrous and pitiful on your part.
I realize you lack the ability to answer this question, but it highlights how and why you’re wrong. Why did the National Archives engage in any “negotiations” with the former President?
I am the one who is. You’re all wrapped up in fantasy.I wish you'd take this whole issue seriously.
I know you’re a joke and you’re afraid of the truth.I know trump is a joke but you're taking this way too far.