No ‘Settlers’ Allowed in Palestinian State, PA Leaders Affirm

[Billo_Really]

Settlers are not obligated to obey the international law.

Which makes them insurgents and legal targets.

 

[Lipush]

Settlers are not obligated to obey the international law.

Which makes them insurgents and legal targets.

I don't follow your logic

 

[Lipush]

As soon as you get the **** off out of America, that isn't yours, and leave it to the Mestizos and remaining indians.

Want me to help you pack?

Bad analogy.

There is no UN resolution telling me to do that.

There is no UN resolution prohibiting Jews to live in Judeah and Samaria.

The "intl law" prohibits what they call "occupation", not the living in the area.

Don't confuse the two.

You've said that settlements should be destroyed, that is against moral and tolerance. The logic thing is to let there be 'peace' with them living under palestinian law.

Why you object this idea? It seems all that'd satisfy you is see Jews uprooted from their homes.

 

[Phoenall]

The Israelis understand that this Program was, from a International Law perspective, unacceptable.

It wasn't "unacceptable" to International Law, it was "ILLEGAL".

"Unacceptable" is a preference; unfortunately, there's no such thing as following only the laws you "prefer".

Tell that to the Hostile arab Palestinians who decide just which aspects of International Law they will follow today.

A good example is the use of qassams against civilian populations, mainly children, which are against International Law.

Until you sort out the breaches by the Hostiles from your side stop making up LIES about the Jews.

 

[Phoenall]

After the attacks in 1948 the UN took away the two state solution, and 242 says this very clearly when it does not mention the Palestinians at all.

It doesn't need to.

What 242 does, is tell the Israeli's, to get the **** off land that isn't theirs.

Care to show were it actually says that, as the report I posted yesterday by the authors of 242 disagrees with your foul mouthed outburst.

 

[Phoenall]

As soon as you get the **** off out of America, that isn't yours, and leave it to the Mestizos and remaining indians.

Want me to help you pack?

Bad analogy.

There is no UN resolution telling me to do that.

Not Yet but if the Amerindians decide to make it an issue then there could be. So what will you do then, try the muslim trick of changing the rules so you can be a terrorist murderer.

 

[Phoenall]

Settlers are not obligated to obey the international law.

Which makes them insurgents and legal targets.

It also make the HoAP terrorists making them valid targets. But first you need to prove that the Jews in the settlements don't hold title to the land. OOOOOPS

 

[Shaarona]

Settlers are not obligated to obey the international law.

Which makes them insurgents and legal targets.

It also make the HoAP terrorists making them valid targets. But first you need to prove that the Jews in the settlements don't hold title to the land. OOOOOPS

I already posted Israeli land laws for you.

 

[syrenn]

Scorched earth policy?

Do you have any problems with them dismantling everything? After all, it was built by them. They are not going to call on the IAF to pull something like Assad -- bombing towns. Would you prefer they just leave everything in place and then pull an Assad?

Yes.. I think destroying existing infrastructure is wasteful. Much of it was built with US money that made low mortgage rates and settler subsidy possible.

Most of the construction companies operating in the West Bank have US partners.

Then this us citizen.... says level it to the ground....leave nothing of use or value.

well.... that is unless its some nice smoking bacon!

 

[docmauser1]

As soon as you get the **** off out of America, that isn't yours, and leave it to the Mestizos and remaining indians.Want me to help you pack?

Bad analogy. There is no UN resolution telling me to do that.

And if there were? hehehe

 

[Victory67]

If Israel won't allow in any refugees why should Palestine allow in settlers?

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

If Israel won't allow in any refugees why should Palestine allow in settlers?

Two different subjects entirely. Non-Jews are equal citizens in Israel, therefore non-muslims should be equal citizens in the forthcoming country of Palestine.

 

[Victory67]

Two different subjects entirely. Non-Jews are equal citizens in Israel, therefore non-muslims should be equal citizens in the forthcoming country of Palestine.

Palestine should allow in Jewish immigrants and let them be citizens of Palestine.

But settlers? No. They must go home to Israel. That's unless Israel is willing to take in Palestinian refugees.

For every Jewish settler allowed to remain in Palestine, 1 Palestinian refugee should be allowed into Israel.

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

Two different subjects entirely. Non-Jews are equal citizens in Israel, therefore non-muslims should be equal citizens in the forthcoming country of Palestine.

Palestine should allow in Jewish immigrants and let them be citizens of Palestine.

But settlers? No. They must go home to Israel. That's unless Israel is willing to take in Palestinian refugees.

For every Jewish settler allowed to remain in Palestine, 1 Palestinian refugee should be allowed into Israel.

I don't get the connection between the first and second sentence. Jewish immigrants from outside Israel would prefer to live in Israel rather than a Sharia country. Settlers (residents of Judea and Samaria commonly known as the West Bank) can live in a Sharia state of Palestine if they want to. If the Palestine government won't let them, then that is of course apartheid. Why do you advocate apartheid?

 

[Victory67]

I don't get the connection between the first and second sentence. Jewish immigrants from outside Israel would prefer to live in Israel rather than a Sharia country. Settlers (residents of Judea and Samaria commonly known as the West Bank) can live in a Sharia state of Palestine if they want to. If the Palestine government won't let them, then that is of course apartheid. Why do you advocate apartheid?

The settlement regime in the West Bank is a system of Apartheid, as the vast majority of people who live in the West Bank cannot live in the settlements or use their roads.

Why do you support and advocate Apartheid?

 

[Sweet_Caroline]

I don't get the connection between the first and second sentence. Jewish immigrants from outside Israel would prefer to live in Israel rather than a Sharia country. Settlers (residents of Judea and Samaria commonly known as the West Bank) can live in a Sharia state of Palestine if they want to. If the Palestine government won't let them, then that is of course apartheid. Why do you advocate apartheid?

The settlement regime in the West Bank is a system of Apartheid, as the vast majority of people who live in the West Bank cannot live in the settlements or use their roads.

Why do you support and advocate Apartheid?

That is because there are Arabs out to kill Jews. Jewish drivers have to run the gauntlet on roads due to boulders and rocks being thrown and people have been killed and severely injured.

This father and son. Asher and Yonatan Palmer, were killed when the car they were in was attacked by stone-throwing arabs. The rock was thrown at the victims' car from a vehicle speeding in the opposite direction, thereby significantly increasing the force of impact.

G-d rest their sweet souls.

And this sweetie was only discharged from hospital last week after the car she was in was attacked by stone throwers in March 2013.

So spare me the sob story of the poor downtrodden Palestinians, because Israel needs to safeguard her citizens' safety.

 

[Victory67]

That is because there are Arabs out to kill Jews. Jewish drivers have to run the gauntlet on roads due to boulders and rocks being thrown and people have been killed and severely injured.

Palestinians are angry at illegal settlers who live on stolen land. Their anger is justified.

Furthermore, as Israel has declared many of these settlements to have been on land confiscated for military purposes, one could argue that the settlements are therefore military installations and their inhabitants are military targets.

Israel could undo this situation by declaring all settlements to be on State land.

 

[montelatici]

If Israel won't allow in any refugees why should Palestine allow in settlers?

Two different subjects entirely. Non-Jews are equal citizens in Israel, therefore non-muslims should be equal citizens in the forthcoming country of Palestine.

Non-Jews are not equal citizens in Israel.

 

[Victory67]

If Israel won't allow in any refugees why should Palestine allow in settlers?

Two different subjects entirely. Non-Jews are equal citizens in Israel, therefore non-muslims should be equal citizens in the forthcoming country of Palestine.

Non-Jews are not equal citizens in Israel.

They certainly aren't treated as equals in the West Bank.

But that's because they aren't Israelis and don't deserve to be treated like Israelis.

But the West Bank isn't part of Israel, so treating Palestinians different than Israelis in the West Bank equals Apartheid.

But they aren't Israelis so they don't deserve to be treated like Israelis.

This is how the conversation will go.

 

[toastman]

If Israel won't allow in any refugees why should Palestine allow in settlers?

Two different subjects entirely. Non-Jews are equal citizens in Israel, therefore non-muslims should be equal citizens in the forthcoming country of Palestine.

Non-Jews are not equal citizens in Israel.

All citizens of Israel are equal. Stop lying