No More Ceasefire, No More Aid

Nah, you dont need to level the entirety of Gaza in order to find tunnel entrances. When the population is no longer in the area and you have free reign, finding tunnel entrances is a lot harder if they are buried under rubble. Israel did it to make sure that they wouldnt live there anymore.
Its not about finding the tunnel shafts, per se. The IDF has no interest in following Hamas down into the tunnels when it can just block the entrances. It is about disabling the use of the tunnels, and disrupting the booby traps, and flushing out the terrorists.
 
Its not about finding the tunnel shafts, per se. The IDF has no interest in following Hamas down into the tunnels when it can just block the entrances. It is about disabling the use of the tunnels, and disrupting the booby traps, and flushing out the terrorists.
Gaza is GONE! Total ruins. Hamas couldnt build enough tunnels in a hundred years to cover all of Gaza. Destroying the buildings was not connected to their tunnel operations. In some cases sure, but they mostly destroyed the buildings so no one would live there anymore.
 
Gaza is GONE! Total ruins. Hamas couldnt build enough tunnels in a hundred years to cover all of Gaza. Destroying the buildings was not connected to their tunnel operations. In some cases sure, but they mostly destroyed the buildings so no one would live there anymore.
500 km of tunnels with multiple entrances in UNKNOWN (to the IDF) locations including homes, mosques, hospitals, universities, and other protected places. Try again.
 
500 km of tunnels with multiple entrances in UNKNOWN (to the IDF) locations including homes, mosques, hospitals, universities, and other protected places. Try again.
In order to have a tunnel under every structure in Gaza, youd need a million km of tunnels.
 
In order to have a tunnel under every structure in Gaza, youd need a million km of tunnels.
Did I say EVERY structure? I did not. And you wouldn't need millions of km of tunnels, you would only need multiple entrances to whatever number of kms of tunnels you have.
 
Did I say EVERY structure? I did not. And you wouldn't need millions of km of tunnels, you would only need multiple entrances to whatever number of kms of tunnels you have.
This weird ass debate over tunnels and destroyed buildings started over the claim that these buildings were destroyed in order to find the tunnel entrances. You dont need to destroy every buildings in Gaza in order to find tunnel entrances. They destroyed every building in Gaza in order to make sure that Palestinians couldnt live there anymore.
 
This weird ass debate over tunnels and destroyed buildings started over the claim that these buildings were destroyed in order to find the tunnel entrances. You dont need to destroy every buildings in Gaza in order to find tunnel entrances. They destroyed every building in Gaza in order to make sure that Palestinians couldnt live there anymore.
Not every building in Gaza has been destroyed. The purpose was to destroy the military infrastructure, including the tunnels.
 
Not every building in Gaza has been destroyed. The purpose was to destroy the military infrastructure, including the tunnels.
Got any pics of areas NOT destroyed?
 
Got any pics of areas NOT destroyed?
Got any statistics? You know, actual facts.

Oh wait, I do.

"UNOSAT identified 60,368 destroyed structures, 20,050 severely damaged structures, 56,292 moderately damaged structures, and 34,102 possibly damaged structures for a total of 170,812 structures. These correspond to around 69% of the total structures in the Gaza Strip."

Which leaves us with:

24% destroyed
8% severely damaged
23% moderately damaged
14% may or may not be damaged; damage minimal
31% intact

Significant damage, certainly. But also significant tunnel infrastructure, so it tracks.
 
Got any statistics? You know, actual facts.

Oh wait, I do.

"UNOSAT identified 60,368 destroyed structures, 20,050 severely damaged structures, 56,292 moderately damaged structures, and 34,102 possibly damaged structures for a total of 170,812 structures. These correspond to around 69% of the total structures in the Gaza Strip."

Which leaves us with:

24% destroyed
8% severely damaged
23% moderately damaged
14% may or may not be damaged; damage minimal
31% intact

Significant damage, certainly. But also significant tunnel infrastructure, so it tracks.

Got any pictures of buildings that ARENT destroyed?
 
I just posted the link with the stats.
Stats.... Who made the stats? I trust pictures. I havent found a pic of Gaza yet that doesnt show total destruction.
 
Stats.... Who made the stats? I trust pictures. I havent found a pic of Gaza yet that doesnt show total destruction.
Follow the link. That's why I provided it.
 
15th post
Oh. So you don't trust the UN. Yeah, me neither.
OHHH **** no i dont trust the UN! Youve lost your damn mind if you think im trusting them on ANYTHING these days. :cuckoo:
 
OHHH **** no i dont trust the UN! Youve lost your damn mind if you think im trusting them on ANYTHING these days. :cuckoo:
The UN is biased, without doubt. But at least I am trying to work from some sort of actual facts instead of enthusiastic, uniformed rhetoric as the alternative. The idea that every. single. building. in. Gaza has been destroyed is weird and ridiculous. And "show me a picture" is not facts.
 
The UN is biased, without doubt. But at least I am trying to work from some sort of actual facts instead of enthusiastic, uniformed rhetoric as the alternative. The idea that every. single. building. in. Gaza has been destroyed is weird and ridiculous. And "show me a picture" is not facts.
We have some really fucked up countries in the world, yet for some reason, they have sanctioned Israel BY FAR more times than any other nation. UN buildings used to house jewish hostages, UN workers participating in October 7th attacks. Nah, the UN is not a reliable source at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom